To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > would still like
t"
To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > wo
> I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
> dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
> formally limit if possible.
Yes, I am using properties for version numbers. e.g. ${r
>> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
>> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
>> interpolated already.
> That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
> in the new maven code is to keep the
> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
> interpolated already.
That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
in the new maven code is to keep the model
I'm looking at providing the capability for transitive dependencies in
Maven which would (in my eyes) rely on the pom files being installed in
the poms directory in the local repository.
I've noticed that only ejb, ear and war projects install the poms to the
local repository. Is there a reason
