Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

ay.com > https://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > -- > What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and > those who don't. > To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. >

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

I’d like to migrate to sonatype central but it introduced new set of limitations that made our project (Trino) unreleasable (2 gb upload limit where our project is 5.9 Gb) :) I have no idea what was wrong with the previous approach (create staging repo, upload multiple files, close repo, promote)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.10

+1 (nb). Works fine on Trino :) On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 10:00 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 9:22 PM Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 36 issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12355010 >

Re: Maven 4.0.0 Release - Thoughts?

+1 (nb) Greatest release of them all! On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 08:21 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | .NET Blog > | Blog > | Old > Blog

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 21 for Maven 4 (Rephrased Vote)

Non-binding +1 :) On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 3:16 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > Non-binding +1 > > Gary > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025, 09:12 Matthias Bünger wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > over the last years we had several discussions about lifting the > > required Java version to run Maven from 8 to somethi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-3

+1 (nb). Tested on Trino :) On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 3:33 PM Jermaine Hua wrote: > +1 > > Guillaume Nodet 于2025年3月5日 周三19:15写道： > > > We solved 108 issues since rc-2. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MNG/versions/12355493 > > > > Staging repositories: > > https://repository.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-1

+1 nb, tested on Trino On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 1:26 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > Le lun. 25 nov. 2024 à 12:50, Tamás Cservenák a > écrit : > > > Howdy, > > > > We solved 46 issues: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12355164 > > > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] activating Reproducible Builds by default in Maven 4

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 5:58 AM Christoph Läubrich wrote: > > yes, this is the idea: there is no other option I can imagine to get > a reproducible zip entries timestamp, whatever the precise value of the > timestamp it is > > If anybody has any other algorithm idea (that supports wide reality

Re: [DISCUSSION] activating Reproducible Builds by default in Maven 4

Reproducible builds are immensely helpful and if this can be supported out of the box I’m all in :) On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 09:05 Hervé Boutemy wrote: > everything is in the title > > Jira issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8258 > PR is https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1726 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-4

+1 nb works like a charm with Trino (no changes needed) On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 19:34 Basil Crow wrote: > +1 > > This release is working well with Jenkins core and plugin builds. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@m

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.9 release soon

Tested locally with Trino on JDK 22.0.2 - builds just fine :) On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:55 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy, > > just a heads up, that Maven 3.9.9 is about to happen soon: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.9.9 > > Un

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven mvnd 1.0.0

Tested with Trino locally: +1 nb. Thanks! This is gonna to be a great release 🎉 🎉 🎉 On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 10:04 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy, > > Note: mvnd 1.x will from now on wrapping Maven 3.9.x and 2.x will wrap > Maven 4.x. > > This release provides distribution on Apache Maven 3.

Re: Apache Maven mvnd 1.0.0 "early access"

Tested and works flawlessly! Thanks :) Looking forward to the release! On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 3:50 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > New builds w/ fixed deprecation warning about JAnsi will land here: > https://github.com/apache/maven-mvnd/actions/runs/9505851154 > > Thanks > T > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.8

Tested in Trino: https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/22382 +1 nb - works flawlessly (as the last couple of releases). Thanks! On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:17 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Ben, > Thank to the whole team! > > I merely brought the schnaps to the party (for warm up) :) > > Thanks > T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-3

+1 (nb) Tested here: https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/22082 On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 17:12 Guillaume Nodet wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-3, as I've cut another > release to fix blocking issues found in beta-2. > > > We solved 25 issues: > > https://issues.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.7

+1 (nb) On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 08:36 Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Agree with Tamas, these are new minor features for the tool so a patch > version is ok. > That said, strictly speaking maven versioning is > arbitrary.arbitrary.(last+1) so we respect our contract ;). > Using semantic versioning w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-2

Can we get beta-3 soon? :) On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 12:38 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > +1 > > But as we know today, this was really too early to call it "beta". We > discovered issues that may introduce API changes... > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 7:41 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > > I've cut anoth

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-beta-2

-1 from our testing at Trino (https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/21966) Previous alphas worked for us, beta-2 doesn't. It seems to complain about our custom packaging ("trino-plugin") that is defined by the trino-maven-plugin here: https://github.com/trinodb/trino-maven-plugin/blob/master/src/m

Re: Nope, 3.5 isn't dead

Hey Elliotte, If the project you are referring to is the one that I'm thinking about, the project I'm working on was in the same situation a couple of years back. In the last 4 years, we've spent a significant amount of time and resources to migrate Trino (https://github.com/trinodb/trino) from T

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 2.0.0-alpha-10

Tested Trino build with both JDK 22 and JDK 23-ea and maven build from https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1460. The previous problem with binary compatibility in one of the plugins we use is gone. On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 1:20 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy, > > Note: This is an eighth (alph

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

+1 non binding as a user and occasional contributor +1 for upgrade to JDK 21 and beyond in the near future On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:09 PM Kévin Buntrock wrote: > +1 as a modest contributor (and also encline to target v21) > > Le mer. 28 févr. 2024, 19:58, Manfred Moser a > écrit : > > > +100

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

gs like "Java 21-ea" (2023) to "Java 21.0.2" > > >> (2024), > > >> > that is 1 year span. > > >> > > > >> > So, "normalized" and "weighted" (by lifespan) results are these: > > >> > htt

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven

Do you have maven version and java version at the same time report? I wonder if old maven is used with old JDK :) On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 23:23 Brian Fox wrote: > Hi everyone. I haven't caught up on this thread but Tamas pinged me to get > some usage data from Central. Attached are the Maven ver