Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.10

+1 non-binding from me. -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On 2 Jun 2025 at 7:21:22 AM, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 36 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=1235

Re: Maven 4.0.0 Release - Thoughts?

On 22 May 2025 at 6:19:26 PM, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > I don't get what plugin updates are expected: are there Maven 3 plugins > known > to fail on Maven 4? If yes, are they so many? > That I’m not sure - since we can’t run our builds under Maven 4 (tiles, mixins, the problems of my ownn makings)

Re: Maven 4.0.0 Release - Thoughts?

On 21 May 2025 at 9:05:07 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I’d prefer to release 4.0.0 with a limited set of new features to > ensure stability and reserve the larger changes for 4.1.0, which we > could target for the end of year. This could also include the upgrade > to JDK 21 since JDK 25 should be

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 21 for Maven 4 (Rephrased Vote)

On 2 May 2025 at 8:02:02 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Changing such an important requirement in the RC phase isn't professional. > Under normal circumstances, I’d probably agree, but I do recall way, way, way back in the early days of 4, there was talk of leaving the final decision until the rel

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 21 for Maven 4 (Rephrased Vote)

+1 non binding. Bring on the new world! -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On 1 May 2025 at 6:23:47 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - JEP 400: UTF-8 by Default (JDK18) > - JEP 418: Internet-Address Resolution SPI (J

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.10 release

odet > > > > Le jeu. 1 mai 2025 à 05:19, Mark Derricutt a écrit : > > Tamás, Guillaume - > > > I note when running 3.9.9 under Java 24, I see: > > > WARNING: A restricted method in java.lang.System has been called > > WARNING: java.lang.System::load has bee

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.10 release

Tamás, Guillaume - I note when running 3.9.9 under Java 24, I see: WARNING: A restricted method in java.lang.System has been called WARNING: java.lang.System::load has been called by org.fusesource.jansi.internal.JansiLoader in an unnamed module (file:/Users/amrk/.sdkman/candidates/maven/current/

Re: Building Maven Under JDK 24

On 20 Mar 2025 at 9:43:02 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > And raise a PR. I suppose we should add jdk24 to the list of JDK we're > building against: > Looks like an upstream ticket has already been raised to add the new ASM to Sisu: https://github.com/eclipse-sisu/sisu-project/issues/174 I’ve

Re: Building Maven Under JDK 24

On 20 Mar 2025 at 7:12:40 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Looks like the error says the opposite, did you check the plugin asm > version and not maven one? > > > Looks like the build is using 0.9.0.M3 of the issue-maven-plugin, which includes and embeded version of asm 9.6: https://github.com/e

Re: Building Maven Under JDK 24

On 20 Mar 2025 at 10:04:24 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > did you try upgrading asm in plugin deps? > Nope - but a cursory glance shows asm 9.7.1 being used, which is the current version. -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree

Building Maven Under JDK 24

Whilst Maven 4 is targeting Java 17, I see the build doesn’t seem to work under Java 24: [INFO] --- sisu:0.9.0.M3:main-index (index-project) @ maven-model-builder --- [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4-

Mixins Extension

On 18 Mar 2025 at 2:48:58 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I'd be happy with a quick look from people experienced with tiles to check > that it makes sense. > Took a quick look just now and aim to give it a closer/larger look soon. Left one comment on the PR but also just noticed I get an NPE on a

Re: What is new in Maven 4?

On 17 Mar 2025 at 3:04:31 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > And it just breaks all editors and IDE out there except the almost no more > used netbeans ;) > Does it? I guess that depends on how you use your IDE. IntelliJ still resolves dependencies fine, and that’s all I care about— anything maven

Re: What is new in Maven 4?

On 17 Mar 2025 at 2:27:47 AM, Fred Cooke wrote: > Why not simply adopt the existing widely used tile system - but not require > the plugin anymore > There are many reasons for that - at least in its current incarnation (groovy based, tho I have a Java port but that also integrates some question

Re: What is new in Maven 4?

On 17 Mar 2025 at 2:42:25 AM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > It's possible that what you're trying to achieve could be equally well > achieved by appropriate use of XInclude, though Maven's borked > namespace handling might prevent that. > XInclude *would* work - *if* it supported pulling remot

Re: What is new in Maven 4?

Hey Fred, I’d also love to revive the discussion, as it stands sadly - it seems Tiles as a plugin is at an empass, it’s been awhile since I had a look at my branch trying to update the code to M4 (had some personal health issues, and work deadlines take me away from that tho). With Maven 4’s mov

Re: What is new in Maven 4?

On 23 Jan 2025 at 12:28:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I did an experiment some time ago: > https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1209 > Ahh - I didn’t think to look at PRs! This would need to be rewritten. > We also have https://github.com/apache/maven-xinclude-extension which is > slightl

Re: What is new in Maven 4?

Did any form of mixin’s make it’s way into Maven 4 at all? Looking at all that new dependency inference looks cool, but didn’t see anything mentioning plugins? I remember seeing a element mentioned somewhere in an IT test some time ago but can’t for the life of me find it now, or any thing refer

Re: Future of palantir / spotless in Maven

On 29 Nov 2024 at 8:58:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Or https://github.com/palantir/palantir-java-format/pull/935 > Having posted on that ticket previously, it sounds like it’s just waiting on being reviewed/merged, even tho it sounds like others have been using it a lot already. I’d posted

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.9 (respin #1)

+1 non-binding from me. -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On 17 Aug 2024 at 4:35:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.8

+1 non-binding so far from me and our maven-tiles/osgi based project. Mark -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On 13 Jun 2024 at 8:49:07 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy, > > We solved 16 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/s

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.7

On 26 May 2024 at 7:22:40 PM, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > There is the issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-503 > > Good to know! Will keep an eye out for an updated plugin.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.7

validate unix On 26 May 2024 at 1:53:34 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Hey all, congrats on the new release - only I just updated

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.7

Hey all, congrats on the new release - only I just updated and unfortunately get this with the enforcer plugin: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:3.4.1:enforce (enforce-versions) on project com.smxemail.disaster.manager: Execution enforce-versions of go

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.13.0 Released

Interesting - I just hit: Execution default-compile of goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.13.0:compile failed: An API incompatibility was encountered while executing org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.13.0:compile: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.codehaus.plexus.c

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-7 released

On 28/08/2023 at 11:42:48 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I haven’t had a chance to look into this yet - but I wondered if anyone > else had seen anything similar? > > > No. Can you check if you're using a recent surefire version ? > I’m using 3.1.2 here, which AFAIK is the latest. Along with Ju

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-7 released

On 29/06/2023 at 3:16:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Maven 4.0.0-alpha-7 is available via https://maven.apache.org/download.cgi > Interesting - I noticed over the weekend that under 4.0.0-alpha-7 surefire isn’t picking up any of my Junit 5 tests, but maven 3.9.4 is. I haven’t had a chance to

Re: [DISCUSS] Major changed for 4.x

Porcupine Tree On 24/08/2023 at 11:41:25 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > On 23/08/2023 at 9:46:16 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> The two ITs for mixins are available at >> >> https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/280/commits/13173969007b5e3b307ef5b191a

Re: [DISCUSS] Major changed for 4.x

On 23/08/2023 at 9:46:16 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > The two ITs for mixins are available at > > https://github.com/apache/maven-integration-testing/pull/280/commits/13173969007b5e3b307ef5b191ac2d52a23dce6c > Nice - that looks like it should work - does that unfold into the effective-pom at a

Re: [DISCUSS] Major changed for 4.x

Definitely keen on seeing this, or the approach taken - as Maven 4.x breaks the existing usage of tiles-maven-plugin so having something supported, that covers the same featureset would be good. Where in GIthub can I see the IT’s mentioned here? On 22/08/2023 at 7:32:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrot

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

On 31/05/2023 at 9:21:43 PM, Michael Osipov wrote: > even if we are in alpha phase now. > I bet many people will stick for 3.9.x or even 3.8.x for the years to > come. Yep - unless 4.x can introduce some hook for extensions to modify the POM model before becoming immutable, I don’t see us movi

Re: [VOTE] Change to the voting process

nted has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.2

an be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Descri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.2

On 9 May 2023, at 10:29, Mark Derricutt wrote: > +1 Non binding - works fine on works OSGi / tiles-maven-plugin project ( > sadly, unlike M4 - still need to look into this ). Actually - I noticed this at the end of my build ( which was still successful ): [WARNING] Plugin validation

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.2

into this ). --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://fac

Re: [ANN] Maven Checkstyle Plugin 3.2.2 released

quot;The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.1

ses: > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > > Vote open for 72h > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform fo

Re: CVEs in maven-compat via toolchains

right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt

Re: CVEs in maven-compat via toolchains

t;The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt

CVEs in maven-compat via toolchains

appear to be a newer version of `maven-toolchain` at all - or is there and I'm just looking in the wrong place these days? Cheers, Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.9.0

the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt

Re: Maven 3.9,0 plan

quot; is strange, especially as BasicRepositoryConnectorFactory is provided by Maven itself? Thanks Tamas --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Der

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-4 release

mmutable `setFile` - anyone know if theres an alpha/snapshot build of invoker that's compatible? Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derri

Re: Maven 3.9,0 plan

``` --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt

Re: Maven 3.9,0 plan

at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.7

ht change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-3

:19, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1835 --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Build Cache Extension 1.0.0 Released

Congrats - look forward to trying it out. I note however the site links to some missing files: https://maven.apache.org/extensions/resources/maven-build-cache-config.xml from the https://maven.apache.org/extensions/maven-build-cache-extension/getting-started.html page for one (which also still

Re: Logging in Maven Plugins - Bridging

On 6/11/2022 at 8:48:28 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > But the biggest problems with JUL include requiring everything being > wrapped with isEnabled type methods to avoid logging overhead I believe that was one of things addressed in the Flogger benefits - with their API using LOG.atDebug()... or LO

Re: Logging in Maven Plugins - Bridging

On 6/11/2022 at 8:31:45 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I can absolutely guarantee you that if Google is actually using JUL that > they > have written plenty of their own code on top of it since JUL is woefully > incomplete. Google came up with Flogger - their fluent logging API that wraps JUL ( and

Re: API changes - was [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-2

On 21/10/2022 at 12:41:54 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Merged and I’ll release in the morning - and run our main projects thru > with Maven 4.0.0 and see how it fares. > Doh - released the new tiles this morning ( should really have tested it again $work’s main project first tho)

Re: API changes - was [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-2

On 20/10/2022 at 11:49:48 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > created PR that should restore compatibility, moreover, it remains mvn 3 > and 4 compatible > (and some little cosmetic change to plexus xml) > Oh sweet! Kudos. Just triggered the build jobs with IT tests and all passed. Merged and I’ll

Re: [DISCUSS] Change maven code style

On 20/10/2022 at 10:52:41 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > definitely +1 for palantir. > Having been trusted with clang-format on a few things - tried out spotless/pantir on a small project. +1 on that - it’s nice, tho - I wish it could be 2 space indents, going back to 4 spaces I suspect will be dis

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-2

+1 one my projects not using tiles. -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On 20/10/2022 at 10:38:47 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > I only have a small issue. > I have this env var > MAVEN_OPTS=-Djava.awt.headless=true -client -Xmx2048m

API changes - was [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-2

Trying out the new 4.0.0-alpha-2 release I see our tiles-maven-plugin doesn’t work: Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.maven.project.DefaultProjectBuilder: method ()V not found at io.repaint.maven.tiles.TilesProjectBuilder. (TilesProjectBuilder.groovy) at io.repaint.maven.t

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

On 25/07/2022 at 10:38:34 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: > ...and their justification is? Don't tell me they will use Java 11 > features to sort a POM? Joke. None - https://github.com/Ekryd/sortpom/commit/080797dfee00b29839c2975348b5627911e2f5ad#commitcomment-78648749 -- "Great artists are extre

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

For what it’s worth - I’m now finally starting to see a lot more libraries updating their minimum supported versions to a mix of 11 and 17. And now also encountering mojo updates ( sort pom hit he recently ) that updated their minimum to 11 - and sadly all these changes are under minor/patch vers

Re: Question - JDK Minimum of future Apache Maven 4.0.0

Is that due to cold starting the JVM each time? I wonder if mvnd supports toolchains effectively? Or if that could be an avenue to try. -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On 23/07/2022 at 8:13:23 PM, Delany wrote: > I tried toolchains

Re: [ANN] Maven Resolver 1.8.0 released

What version of maven can this be used under? I call this from one of my plugins and when updating to 1.8.0 I get: Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'java.util.List org.eclipse.aether.spi.connector.layout.RepositoryLayout.getChecksumAlgorithmFactories()' at org.eclipse.aether.connector.

Re: [DISCUSS] New Maven Core API for 4.x

I’m wondering (off the cuff thought here) if having a stronger design difference between a standard Mojo, and an Extension might be useful? As general mojo/plugin - having an injected immutable MavenProject *view* is probably fine, but for an extension I probably want a mutable MavenProject.Builde

Re: [DISCUSS] New Maven Core API for 4.x

project for 4.x+. Mark -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On 29/03/2022 at 8:53:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Le lun. 28 mars 2022 à 21:22, Mark Derricutt a écrit : > > I wonder how much of this will break

Re: [DISCUSS] New Maven Core API for 4.x

I wonder how much of this will break what we do with the tiles-maven-plugin, where we essentially “inject” parents into the model via a maven extension. I remember I was seeing some odd issues under earlier builds of 4.x as well some time ago but will need to refresh my memory on what that was no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.1

+1 non-binding - bistro zips are in the /dev/ tree - my multi-repo osgi maven tiles weirdo build works fine. From: Robert Scholte Reply: Maven Developers List Date: 31 March 2021 at 9:58:56 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.1 Hi, For th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

Mostly reads good to me, only minor niggle to me is: Then once the vote passed, svn move to release which I think might be grammatically better: “Once the vote has passed, svn move to the release tree ” +1.5 non-binding :) From: Hervé BOUTEMY Reply: Maven Developers List Date: 27 March

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

I notice in the vote email we have mentioned: dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/maven–3/3.8.0/binaries/apache-maven–3.8.0-bin.zip which doesn’t really highlight anywhere that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

+1 non-binding from me, tho I have (potential) concerns. I’d missed seeing the emails about the release vote, but DID notice that Mac Homebrew had upgraded me magically to 3.8.0. Which led me to tweeting that it seemed the download page wasn’t updated ( then a followup about home-brew jumping the

Re: [DISCUSS] Allow attributes shorthand in pom.xml

Spoken just like someone who deals with people from high school in 2005. I certainly care about reproducible builds - maybe not to the level of some, but when working on projects that span multiple years, have multiple deployments in different data centres for different customers, with different v

Re: Hello from mvnd

I just wanna say kudos to mvnd - found it the other day on r/java (or r/programming) and I must say - this is awesome. It even plays well with our tiles-maven-plugin which I was sure it would play up on. Mark From: Peter Palaga Reply: Maven Developers List Date: 14 October 2020 at 8:55:14

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.6.1

+1 Non-binding. Seems to be working fine on my custom artefact resolving plugin/library. On 3 October 2020 at 7:32:20 AM, Osipov Michael (micha...@apache.org) wrote: Hi, We solved 25 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12348853 There are st

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.5.0

Hervé, Michael - missed the email about the vote earlier, just went hunting for the repo details to try it out on our internal range resolver/locking tool. +1 NON Binding here - passes my unit tests on my library, and the maven mojo that uses it runs fine as works as expected. Mark On 22 July 2

Re: Maven moving to the next level: the build/consumer pom

Hervé, If you configure IntelliJ (projecting much Mark?) to use Maven 3.7.0-SNAPSHOT as it’s maven version, does that work? I tend to configure my IJ to use my built SNAPSHOT when testing out Maven releases. Mark On 6 July 2020 at 8:21:57 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY (herve.bout...@free.fr) wrote: What i

Re: Maven moving to the next level: the build/consumer pom

Robert Scholte: There is a feature toggle, see https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/maven-model-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/feature/Features.java#L34 Awesome - I’ll get that a play and report back. Does this mean that the install:install did work? That would be interesting. I

Re: Maven moving to the next level: the build/consumer pom

I thought I’d responded - this has been a long time coming, and has been discussed numerous times over the past few years, and I’m quite excited to give it a bash, and see how well it works, and see if/what any implications this has for our tiles-maven-plugin. I still need to find time to dig into

Re: 'modelVersion' is missing.

and see if things break once I add those modelVersion's into the tiles. --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.chaliceof

'modelVersion' is missing.

ing... Cheers, Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. **Mark Derricutt** | Senior Developer **Phone**: +64 9 302 0515 Fax: +64 9 302 0518 **Mobile**: +6

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Release Plugin 3.0.0-M1 Released

or the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Reproducible Builds for Maven

this has todays - which makes sense, but I wonder if it shouldn't be the same time for one extra step of "the exact same output"... Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Pla

Re: last review of Reproducible Builds proposal

ll to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Reproducible Builds for Maven

ecide which ( and when ) we pull them in to use - often committing those changes individually. --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold.

Re: Reproducible Builds for Maven

Oh right! I missed the second half of our pom.deps file:    blacklisted org.hibernate:hibernate-ehcache:4.2.19.Final from smx3:smx3.bill-of-materials:2.1.1;    deprecated org.hibernate:hibernate-search-engine:4.4.0.Final from smx3:smx3.bill-of-materials:2.1.1;    resolved org.hibernate:hibernat

Re: Reproducible Builds for Maven

Tomo Suzuki wrote on 23/09/19 3:56 PM: Does your approach use such file to record library versions? I don't know about what Hervé is doing, but internally we have a tool I wrote for handling this, we have a pom.deps file that looks like:     repository http://nexus.XX as public;     impor

Commits on the repo?

eers, Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Install Plugin Version 3.0.0-M1 Released

n back down, and raise a ticket for Karaf. Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://w

Re: Maven 4.0.0

d has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Maven 4.0.0

a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://fa

Re: JDK 10 b29 Early Access is available on jdk.java.net

hange for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Maven 4.0.0

Would adding support for 2 new scopes be viable without changing the pom model ( the DTD/XSD doesn't actually define the values so that should be ok). Specifically I'm thinking 'annotation' ( having annotationPaths on m-c-p was a workaround, but kinda horrible in practice ), and maybe "module" for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

+1 looking good from here on my projects/releases. -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 26 issues: > https://issues.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

Would it be possible to handle this in a somewhat similar way to threadSafe mojos - some form of plugin flag that says "extensionSafe" [1], that if the plugin has true declared and doesn't declare itself as being extensionSafe/extensionAware then we log a build warning - it wouldn't solve anything,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

y selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:26, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > Calling -2 for vote if not too late. > > Actually - looking at the commit diff, I see in our code we did

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:26, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Calling -2 for vote if not too late. Actually - looking at the commit diff, I see in our code we did have `true` for the `jasmine-maven-plugin` which we don't actually need. Removing that from the mojo definition and running my build w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

however. Mark On 11 Sep 2017, at 23:19, Mark Derricutt wrote: > On 11 Sep 2017, at 18:10, Stephen Connolly wrote: > >> I wonder if mng-6275 is affecting that plugin > > Didn't manage to get a chance to look into this tonight :( Tho that ticket > mentions nashor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

e right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

://maven.apache.org/components/ref/3-LATEST/ >> >> Vote open for 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Stephen. >> > > > > -- > - > Arnaud Héritier > http://aheritier.net >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.7.0

The problems with errorprone have been fixed in the recent 2.1.1 release so you could update the tests with that maybe? -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi Karl Heinz, > > this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JDeps Plugin version 3.1.0

--- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: maven-jdeps-plugin and JDK9 - no love :(

emented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderric

Re: maven-jdeps-plugin and JDK9 - no love :(

ther release... 23 on the countdown to Java 9 :) Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http:

maven-jdeps-plugin and JDK9 - no love :(

--- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricut

What became of Aether/Ant tasks...

e for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   3   4   5   >