Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2013-01-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > IMHO, top bar menu isn't ready for the moment: still need to find an idea to > make it efficient Perhaps, but I think it would be a mistake to abandon the top navigation menu. > for the moment, I stringly prefer to stay with the

Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2012-12-29 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > There was a comment about this in the surefire release ( > (http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/), > so I figured we might as well get on with this discussion. I don't disagree with any of what you had to

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > The distributable binaries and sources for testing can be found here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-110/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.1.0/ Created https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5403 Continui

maven lifecycle extension for enabling exceptions

2012-11-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, I'm curious why this isn't working: import org.apache.maven.*; import org.apache.maven.execution.*; import org.codehaus.plexus.component.annotations.*; import org.codehaus.plexus.logging.*; @Component(role = AbstractMavenLifecycleParticipant.class) public final class ErrorMessagesExte

Re: More git migrations

2012-09-24 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Graham wrote: > +1 > > On 25/09/2012, at 6:06 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> I hate to be the one hitting the brakes on everything Git, but... >> ...I really think we shouldn't move our release component to Git until >> we have ironed out any poss

Re: Error in dependency

2012-08-03 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Nimm wrote: > I use dependencies and created war file... > but after deploying that it shows error... i think it is the problem with > versions.. but i don't know what jar versions need to change > and please give me those dependencies also. > I incl

Re: build extensions

2012-08-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > Most of the time it works just fine, however sometimes after I have > mvn clean previously, I will take an exception in the log on the next > mvn invocation: > > [WARNING] Failed to retrieve plugin

build extensions

2012-08-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, After being inspired by another thread, I decided to create a build extension. All it does right now is cut a message to the log: @Component(role = AbstractMavenLifecycleParticipant.class) public final class BannerExtension extends AbstractMavenLifecycleParticipant { @Requirement pr

Re: Snark on the users list

2012-07-23 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Jesse Farinacci wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Benson Margulies >>> wrote: >&

Re: Snark on the users list

2012-07-23 Thread Jesse Farinacci
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > If you aren't comfortable with tools like this, but you need to use > Maven for some reason, you will need to find assistance, and the Maven > user community is not a great place to get it, since that community > expects that users have th

Re: Snark on the users list

2012-07-23 Thread Jesse Farinacci
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Rev 1364633 is a small contribution to more stuff to link to. Nice job, Benson. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not. -

Re: [RFC] Reimagining the artifact and repository-interaction APIs

2012-04-28 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:35 PM, John Casey wrote: > I don't want to have dozens of these things popping up, one per > {surefire,release,plugin-tools,shared-{*}, etc}...that seems like it'll > cause a lot of maintenance problems. OTOH, having a single large git repo is > probably not r

Re: Proposal: the maven build-from-source-plugin

2012-04-25 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I was wondering how > hard it would be to build a plugin, perhaps inspired by the scm > plugin, that could download and build source. While I don't think I would personally use the reasons you want this plugin, I have several

Re: [RFC] Reimagining the artifact and repository-interaction APIs

2012-04-09 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, That's mildly interesting, but what about other work which has already been developed and would see real and practical gains for users? I'm thinking about things in https://github.com/etesla On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:27 PM, John Casey wrote: > I finally have some cycles free to work on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Fluido Skin 1.2.1 based on RC1

2012-03-27 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-118/ I'm using topbar and sidebar basic menus, but I'm not seeing any bread crumbs being created in the little area underneath the left and right nav areas

Re: Help! Trouble understanding Jenkins output...

2012-01-19 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:16 PM, John Casey wrote: > I caused the Surefire build to fail, but I'll be damned if I can figure out > how. > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/193/consoleFull > Anyone have any insight into how I can see the failures? If you log in you should be

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC5 staged

2012-01-10 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC5 has been staged for testing purpose. > This is a preview (and not an official supported version) of the > coming 3.0.4 official release. > Thanks a lot for putting this RC out, and mirroring it locally. I ha

Re: WARNING: Cannot use Maven 3.0.3 with Maven Release Plugin 2.2.2 (MNG-5224)

2012-01-03 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > that is because you are using maven-release-plugin 2.2.1 > switch to 2.2.2 and see how you feel Sounds like there is a clear and easy work around. Why hold up a release for this? -Jesse --

Re: WARNING: Cannot use Maven 3.0.3 with Maven Release Plugin 2.2.2 (MNG-5224)

2012-01-03 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Surely something as egregious as allowing releases to break should block > 3.0.4 from being released tho. As someone who uses GPG in that manner for > some of his releases I'd certainly want 3.0.4 to be able to release... It d

Re: Using maven as appstore for java app

2011-12-22 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Deepesh Garg wrote: > I share your pain, but couldn't find anything close when it comes to > installing java apps. I don't think there is a standard for that, nor do I think it is required. The shared library mechanism employed by Linux and other hi

Re: Using maven as appstore for java app

2011-12-22 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Deepesh Garg wrote: > 1) Have a new packaging type which indicate that this is an installable > application. Pom file for such apps can include things like description, > display name, icon file, location to put application launchers, type of > applica

Re: How to get nice doc for a bean-ie sort of Mojo parameter

2011-12-11 Thread Jesse Farinacci
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > This is something that frustrates users no end: when a plugin has a > parameter of complex type, and the doc does not elucidate the > structure of the complex doc At All. +1024 -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, thos

Re: RC release naming (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2) )

2011-12-05 Thread Jesse Farinacci
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Personally, I'd rather burn 3.0.4 and have 3.0.5, 3.0.6, etc > version numbers are cheap... > if anyone asks what happend to 3.0.4, we just say, oh that was not > released, there's a tag of it in svn, but there are no binaries or source > d

Re: ideas for the maven site

2011-11-28 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > an other Iive sample: http://people.apache.org/~olamy/maven/scm/ > http://people.apache.org/~olamy/maven/scm/ > sample of a mojo documentation: > http://people.apache.org/~olamy/maven/scm/maven-scm-plugin/update-mojo.html > looks

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype version 2.2

2011-11-19 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Staging site: > http://maven.apache.org/archetype-2.2 "We're sorry, but the page you requested cannot be found." -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not.

Re: Fluido skin & Maven site

2011-10-17 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > I just deployed on my ASF personal space[1] the maven.apache.org site > where I applied the fluido skin. > [1] http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/maven/site/index.html I like it! One enhancement I have wanted for a while wi

Re: Maven Dependency Plugin

2011-09-13 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > There are these inconvenient creatures called users, and many of them > are, for whatever organizational reasons, stuck in 2.x. The simplest > solution is to make a branch, and not do much to it on the 2.x branch. > No horrib

Re: Maven Dependency Plugin

2011-09-13 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Are we going to end up with two branches of the plugin? Or how about we stop making whips for our own backs? Why don't we draw a line in the sand for the plugins (by cutting a release) and say this far, no further. All future

Re: Blog article on customizing Maven's lifecycle.

2011-09-06 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Kasturi Kumthekar wrote: > http://pragmaticjava.blogspot.com/2011/08/customizing-mavens-lifecycle.html I find it almost pathological to enforce both Java 1.6 and Maven 2.0.10. Most people would not be so bold, Kudos on your bravery in this regard, -Je

Re: [ANN] Maven Site Plugin 3.0 Released

2011-08-03 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Congratulations!!! On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Site > Plugin, version 3.0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For

Re: Jenkins is sending more e-mails now

2011-08-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, 2011/8/1 Arnaud Héritier : >  FYI, the Jenkins team was working recently into merging a part of the > Editable Email feature into the default one. This is mostly captured and available via [1] and [2]. While not strictly related, [3] is quite interesting for people curious in this real

Re: svn commit: r1069599 - /maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml

2011-02-11 Thread Jesse Farinacci
WOO WOO!!! Nice one :-) On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > This is not set in the POM but the default is 1.5 now: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/AbstractCompilerMojo.java -Jesse -- There are

Re: svn commit: r1069599 - /maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml

2011-02-11 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi, On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more > conservative > Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plugin version ? Check http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?view=mar

Re: svn commit: r1069599 - /maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml

2011-02-11 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > > This parent POM like any other parent POM provides default values, i.e. > something that projects can override as they see fit. Correct me if I'm > mistaken, but I'm under the impression that Site Plugin 2.2 is generally an

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven DOAP Plugin version 1.1

2011-01-05 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Hi, On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: > > Staging site: > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-doap-plugin-1.1 > The site seems unavailable.. -Jesse -- There are 10 types of people in this world, those that can read binary and those that can not. ---

Re: [VOTE] Establish a creation and retirement plan for plugins

2010-12-15 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins >From the proposal: 2. Make one final release of the plugin before it is retired. This allows us to make a clean break.