Re: [VOTE] Switch to GitHub issues from JIRA

2024-12-18 Thread Jesper Udby
+1 This vote is not about _how_ so I guess it is fine to continue that discussion in parallel ;-) Brgds Jesper Udby On 18/12/2024 08.29, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi, I open vete for question: Do we want to Switch to GitHub issues from JIRA? Discussion was in thread: https

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Patch Plugin

2024-12-09 Thread Jesper Udby
+1 Udby On 09/12/2024 16.59, Maarten Mulders wrote: +1 Maarten On 07/12/2024 11:22, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi, The plugin is not maintained for a long time. It is rational to make it retire to show the real status of the project. Instead of this plugin we can simply use dedicated sourc

Re: Road forward for: New flag to verify the status

2024-04-26 Thread Jesper Udby
"3" for core Cheers Jesper On 26/04/2024 16.11, Juul Hobert wrote: Hi, It's been a while since changes have been made to MNG-6869. It adds helpful functionality that is particularly useful when you're on a company network and want to do some basic checks to verify if Maven is working. This w

Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

2024-02-27 Thread Jesper Udby
+1 On 28/02/2024 08.30, Benjamin Marwell wrote: Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence require Java 17 for Maven 4. This i

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Jesper Udby
I think removing the "suprise" part of a minor upgrade would be a good compromise :-) Brgds Jesper Udby On 29/03/2021 10.34, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 10:24, Jesper Udby a écrit : @Romain: no not really. I'd hate to be in that situation where an &

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Jesper Udby
s (as a one-man army) where unexpected surprises were not welcome. Brgds Jesper Udby On 29/03/2021 09.37, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: @Jesper: just to refine, it is just a matter of adding a custom settings.xml for the build/on the CLI (or override it in maven depending what the org wants) to enable

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Jesper Udby
nd I think we should always be pragmatic. Semver is a scheme that can be interpreted/implemented in different ways. I don't see skipping a number as a big deal. Best regards Jesper Udby On 29/03/2021 09.03, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi, I kind of agree intranet is as secure as the internet

Re: [VOTE] JDK 8 Minimum Requirement for Maven 3.7.0

2019-10-29 Thread Jesper Udby
+1 😃 Jesper Udby ⁣Hent BlueMail til Android ​ Den 30. okt. 2019 02.34, fra 02.34, Manfred Moser skrev: >+1 > >or more ... haha > >Manfred > >Stephen Connolly wrote on 2019-10-29 16:23 (GMT -07:00): > >> +1 >> >> On Tue 29 Oct 2019 at 20:11, Kar

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Repository Builder

2019-08-07 Thread Jesper Udby
+1 ⁣Hent BlueMail til Android ​ Den 7. aug. 2019 21.13, fra 21.13, Robert Scholte skrev: >Hi, > >The Apache Maven project consist of about 90 (sub)projects. Due to the > >small number of volunteers and the huge amount of code to maintain >we're >missing enough space to make real progress on all

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.2.0

2018-09-26 Thread Jesper Udby
+1 > Den 26. september 2018 klokken 21:50 skrev Michael Osipov > : > > > Hi, > > We solved 15 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12343926 > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JXR Plugin version 3.0.0

2018-09-23 Thread Jesper Udby
+1 :-) > Den 24. september 2018 klokken 01:19 skrev Olivier Lamy : > > > > +1 > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 at 21:29, Robert Scholte > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 18 issues: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317527&version=12330848&styleName=Text >