FAIL! I was a bit too late :)
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> > What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
> > easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an "m2" user
> > directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a vestigial of
Just to play devil's advocate, if you run maven then sync your tool, maven
will use .mvn, the IDE/tool will only check .m2.
[]s Gus
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Brian,
>
> What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
> easy upgrade path.
Just as a side note: in most projects, alpha implies that changes in
features or public APIs is possible or likely. Maybe it's not the case for
Maven...
[]s Gus
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
>
> > could we use
Wow, big improvement here too. I had to fix a couple of things in my
build to migrate it to 3.0 (like remove duplicate dependencies I didn't even
know about), and a couple of tests on evil stateful singletons (don't
ask), and voilà! Full clean install dropped from 9m44s or so to 4m45s.
Con
