Oops, that already got answered. Never mind.
On 2006-06-05, at 11:02, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
On 2006-06-03, at 00:05, Brett Porter wrote:
These are all things I have given thought to and would like to see
them worked on in Maven 2.1/2.2. There are a couple of jira issues
already filed
On 2006-06-03, at 00:05, Brett Porter wrote:
These are all things I have given thought to and would like to see
them worked on in Maven 2.1/2.2. There are a couple of jira issues
already filed for some of these specifics.
How about Pragma: no-cache…?
— G
Begin forwarded message:
Here's
This didn't get any traction on the users' list. Is there any way to
moderate the cache control pragmas on Maven's GET requests?
— G
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gordon Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: June 2, 2006 15:49:46 EDT
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Pr
Since central is usually slow during the day, it can be pretty
painful that Maven's local repository does not cache negative
responses. Maybe Maven could stash away the URL and response date for
404's so that it won't try again for a day or two, unless forced to
refresh? (5xx's should not b
Seems a lot of hassle to configure character sets on various plugins
individually. We use UTF-8 for everything (sources, resources). I'd
rather be able to just say…
UTF-8
Rather than having no option but to go configuring resource
directories and the compiler and source reports…
On May 3, 2006, at 11:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
It seems to be common to hit XML problems with surefire because it
is using child first classloading (like a webapp) to ensure you get
what you ask for which often causes xml problems because the apis
are not in the same place as the implemen
Woohoo! +1 (non-binding)
Just don't forget to strip out that isSnapshot() call on the
surefire-2.0 branch… :)
— G
On May 1, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the
classloader has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
Snapshot 20060501.153032-1 works. Thanks!
On May 1, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Make sure you are using cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository
as a snapshot repository, not snapshots.maven.codehaus.org.
That's how the
On May 1, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Make sure you are using cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository as
a snapshot repository, not snapshots.maven.codehaus.org.
That's how the test project was configured. My live project also
includes codehaus.org for Cobertura support. However,
So this afternoon, the latest surefire snapshot landed and began to
politely request that I update my dependency to TestNG 4.7 instead of
4.6.1 for TestNG support. Wishing to build, I did so.
TestNG 4.7 isn't up on central, though, so I installed it in ~/.m2/
repository. That was a manual pr
On Apr 26, 2006, at 8:09 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Check http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/test-
mojo.html, childDelegation option
Minutes too late! Found http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-81…
Agreed with the reporter…
For any others, the fix is thus:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Mike Perham wrote:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Is this a FAQ that I haven't found? My tests run fine
uninstrumented under mvn test, but fail in spectacular and
surprising ways under Cobertura (triggered from mvn site).
You ha
Is this a FAQ that I haven't found? My tests run fine uninstrumented
under mvn test, but fail in spectacular and surprising ways under
Cobertura (triggered from mvn site).
— G
---
Battery: net.mycorp.billing.Car
On Apr 7, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Franz Fehringer wrote:
what does "non binding" mean in these voting mails?
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Often indicates that the voter is a user rather than a contributor.
— G
-
On Mar 31, 2006, at 05:57, Tomasz Pik wrote:
On 3/31/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It means that test can be reused in other projects, so you can
extend or use them from the tests in that project. What is the
point of runing the same tests again in another project?
For exa
On Mar 30, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I would suggest patching against the branch - there is a definite
slow down on trunk at the moment.
AOK—I'll do that.
As for the wedge - does that happen repeatedly?
Ugh, it finished this time, in about 2 minutes or so. I am not
instilled
I'm just trying to build m2's trunk locally so I can submit a patch.
I followed the directions, but there seem to be something awry.
First of all, each one of the integration test takes a bloody
eternity to run. Like a minute. Second, it0094 is (still) wedged
after 20 minutes! It's alive, b
17 matches
Mail list logo
