Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
Thank you.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user Fuud closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
Any questions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
ParallelComputerBuilder.PC sets scheduller to runner (see
org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.pc.ParallelComputerBuilder.PC#setSchedulers(org.junit.runners.ParentRunner
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
>Is that true that at least some runners still have some children since the
beginning when parallel computer (PC) has recognized them?
In general case I can not garantee t
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
I am not sure that I understand your question. But I can try to answer :)
1) JUnit has @RunWith annotaion that consumes Class
2) This Runner should implement method getDescription
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
Because Spock can't (do not want) generate runners at test object creation
time. Parametrized runners are generated at runtime and therefore not known at
init time.
---
If your project i
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
NoTestsRemainException will be thrown in this case
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
With pure JUnit it is not possible.
You can only place @Test annotation on method => there will be at least one
test in TestClass.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
@Jezorko
https://github.com/spockframework/spock/pull/558
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
any updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
Any updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
"Master Origin" integration tests suite does not pass on my Windows box.
```
Results :
Failed tests:
properNewlinesAndEncodingWithDiffere
Github user Fuud commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114#discussion_r91513593
--- Diff:
surefire-providers/surefire-junit47/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/junitcore/pc/ParallelComputerBuilderTest.java
---
@@ -32,15
Github user Fuud commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114#discussion_r91491402
--- Diff:
surefire-providers/surefire-junit47/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/junitcore/pc/ParallelComputerBuilder.java
---
@@ -428,10 +428,10
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
Just FYI: integration tests suite does not pass on Windows.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
Tests run: 701, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 133
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.13:check (checkstyle-check) @
surefire-integration-tests ---
[INFO]
[INFO
Github user Fuud commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
any updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user Fuud opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
Parallel runner should not drop away runners that have zero children.
JUnit does not force runners to include all child tests in Description.
Therefore Parallel Runner should not throw such
19 matches
Mail list logo
