Re: (ping) Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.4.3 (fwd)

2008-05-07 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 worked fine in a few tested projects fabrizio On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (ping) more votes please! :-) We currently have two binding +1, one > non-binding +1. > > -Dan > > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 09:49:39

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Changes Plugin version 2.0

2008-04-14 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 17 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11212&styleName=Html&version=13722 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Eclipse plugin version 2.5

2008-03-16 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved more than 50 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13593&styleName=Html&projectId=11133 > Important changes are : > - Add support for WTP 2.0 > - Add su

Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release Maven Surefire plugin version 2.4.1

2008-01-28 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1! fabrizio On Jan 28, 2008 2:35 AM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's > vote again! > > [Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is > almost irresistable. ;-)] > > -Dan > > -- Forw

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire plugin version 2.4.1

2008-01-28 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Dan, On Jan 28, 2008 2:31 AM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've added comments to SUREFIRE-444. I think this only happens on > versions of TestNG that are pretty old (not sure exactly how old, because > I'm not sure what version of TestNG you're using), but I'm not 100% > certain

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire plugin version 2.4.1

2008-01-27 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+0 while testing this I found http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-444 I verified that the bug was still in 2.4 and I am not sure how many users can be affected... since it can breaks builds without providing any useful information about the cause I'd like it to be included as soon as possible

Re: [Vote] Release Maven Clean Plugin 2.2 (take 2)

2007-12-01 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On Nov 30, 2007 12:43 AM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release (again) maven-clean-plugin 2.2. All artifacts > respect the Apache release rules (Thanks Dan). > > This release fixes some bugs and makes some improvements. The last > release was made o

Re: [VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-beta-1

2007-11-29 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On Nov 29, 2007 4:48 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-1 of the > maven-remote-resources-plugin. This resolves one critical bug reported > by Jason Dillon as well as fixes two other issues: > > > Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Reso

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-dependency-tree 1.1

2007-11-29 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On Nov 29, 2007 8:13 AM, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It has many improvements related to resolution event handling, using > the latest fixes in Maven 2.0.8 > > Release is staged in > http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo/ > > -- > I could give you my word as a

Re: [vote] Alexandru Popescu as a committer

2007-11-28 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On Nov 23, 2007 12:52 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional > on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now > discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the > work

Re: [Vote] Release Maven Shared File Management 1.2

2007-11-28 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On Nov 25, 2007 2:15 PM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Always in the preparation of the Maven Clean Plugin release, I would like to > release the file-management:1.2 > The last release was done around one year ago. > > Staging repo: > http://people.apache.org/~v

Re: [VOTE] release eclipse 2.4 (take 2)

2007-07-10 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 7/8/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's been about 5 months since an eclipse plugin release and we have lots of fixes and a handful of enhancements. The issues detected in the last vote (MECLIPSE-295) have been fixed in the currently staged plugin-testing-tools 1.0-al

Re: [VOTE] release maven-plugin-testing-tools

2007-07-09 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 (great work in catching the pom:test bug, I got that problem in the past without being able to trace it down) fabrizio On 7/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone else? This is required by the eclipse release. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf

Re: [vote] release maven-release-plugin 2.0-beta-5

2007-05-02 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 Tested MRELEASE-209 on a multiproject build and now snapshots versions are now restored correctly, no regressions found. fabrizio On 5/1/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd like to release the maven release plugin which includes the maven release manager and the maven re

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=true&pid=10500&fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository: http://p

Re: Relocations for existing artifacts in the repo

2007-03-18 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
uot;won't fix" and this makes the problem even harder to solve for users. fabrizio tough one ;) -- Kenney Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > Hi, > I would like to start a discussion on how relocations in the central > repo should be handled. > > I recently noticed more and more a

Relocations for existing artifacts in the repo

2007-03-17 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi, I would like to start a discussion on how relocations in the central repo should be handled. I recently noticed more and more artifacts partially relocated in the repo in case of a new upload. With *partially* relocated I means the case of a new version of an existing artifact uploaded with a

Re: [vote] MNG-1577 as the default behavior

2007-03-16 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
A big +1 for making it a default I am also +1 on adding this to 2.0.6: for me this would just mean removing tons of unneeded/workaround dependency from tons of poms. I agree that, although consistent for some time, this behavior introduces so much problems that should be considered a bug and not

Re: [vote] Release Maven Surefire 2.3

2007-02-24 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
a big +1, we have waited too long for this... fabrizio On 2/23/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please vote for the release of Surefire 2.3. This now includes the API, providers, plugin and report plugin. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)

2007-02-13 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Works fine for me, +1 fabrizio On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/ maven-core/2.0.5/ Here is the JIRA roadmap: http://jira.codehaus.org/s

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5

2007-01-13 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 tested on a few complex projects, no regressions found. fabrizio On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, The entire release is staged here: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/ The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here: http://people.apache.o

Re: [vote] release maven-ear-plugin 2.3.1

2007-01-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 1/8/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd like to release the ear plugin which contains a backward compatibility issue in 2.3 [1]. The issue has been fixed and the reporter has validated his builds successfully. Revision 492264 Snapshot available http://people.

Re: [vote] Collapse Maven permission groups

2007-01-10 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
cess groups into a single ACL for Maven, with the following list of 37 committers: Fabrice Bellingard, David Blevins, John Casey, Maria Ching, Joakim Erdfelt, Dan Fabulich (pending), Brian Fox, Fabrizio Giustina, Arnaud Heritier, Jeff Jensen, Shinobu Kawai, Milos Kleint, Trygve Laugstol, Felipe Leme,

Re: deploy surefire snapshot

2007-01-08 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
done On 1/8/07, Tom Huybrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Could somebody deploy a surefire snapshot (including the surefire-junit4 provider) ? thanks, Tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comman

Re: svn commit: r493534 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-repository-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/repository/BundleCreateMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/repository/BundleC

2007-01-07 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 1/7/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you give me an example of an OSS project submitting something to the central repository that doesn't have a public repository? How can you operate as an OSS project without a public repository? well, these are a couple of small projects I

Re: svn commit: r493534 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-repository-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/repository/BundleCreateMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/repository/BundleC

2007-01-07 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 1/7/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6 Jan 07, at 1:45 PM 6 Jan 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > MREPOSITORY-2 project.scm.connection should not be required for > bundle-create > Why not? the project could not have a public repository, there are projects that only distribute b

Re: Releasing the Eclipse plugin

2007-01-04 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
t 5:35 AM 31 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > Hi Jason, > maybe the problem is not on the OS, I was just able to reproduce your > error on Windows: > [ERROR] Nonexistent component: > org.apache.maven.plugin.Mojoorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse- > plugin:2.3-SNAPSHOT:ad

Re: [vote] Barrie Treloar as a Maven Plugins committer

2007-01-04 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to propose we make Barrie a committer. He has contributed a lot of small patches, and recently seems to be the "does it work on Windows?" watchdog. He in particular has done a lot with the assembly plugin and has also dug i

Re: [vote] Establish a list of emeritus committers

2007-01-04 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 1/4/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Vote to operate as - requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is > 0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not binding

Re: [vote] re-vote on maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-1

2007-01-03 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 1/3/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to call a second vote to release maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Releasing the Eclipse plugin

2006-12-31 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Jason, maybe the problem is not on the OS, I was just able to reproduce your error on Windows: [ERROR] Nonexistent component: org.apache.maven.plugin.Mojoorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin:2.3-SNAPSHOT:add-maven-repo this is exactly what happens when I try to install the plugin usin

Re: Eclipse and EAR plugins

2006-12-27 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Jason, from what I can see in the log the only error for the eclipse plugin is the same we saw before: "Component descriptor cannot be found in the component repository: org.apache.maven.plugin.Mojoorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin:test:eclipse." Another thing I see in the log is t

Re: Eclipse plugin release

2006-12-26 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
"org.apache.maven.plugin.Mojoorg.apache.maven.plugins" groupId coming from? Are you using a released version of maven or a 2.1 snapshot? fabrizio On 12/26/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 26 Dec 06, at 4:51 AM 26 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > Hi Jason, > > if you look at the log

Re: Eclipse plugin release

2006-12-26 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Jason, if you look at the logs in the build-output dir you will see that the cause for the failure is simply the missing parent pom (version 7), can you retry after installing/deploying it? [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [IN

Re: [vote] release maven-plugin-plugin 2.2

2006-12-23 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 12/23/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please vote on maven-plugin-plugin and maven-plugin-tools-2.0.x: - svn rev. 489850 - plugin snapshot is 2.2-20061223.040931-3, plugin-tools snapshot is 2.0.5-20061223.041242-4 - documentation already updated at http://maven.apac

Re: [vote result] release maven-eclipse-plugin 2.3 (second try)

2006-12-20 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 12/20/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There was support in maven to run plugins from target/, but it was broken: MNG-2677 (originally MNG-870). well, the eclipse plugin was using that till a few weeks ago and I can assure it was working! I was able to modify the plugin code f

Re: [vote result] release maven-eclipse-plugin 2.3 (second try)

2006-12-20 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi John, On 12/20/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I switched to using a testing version of the plugin (which BTW is only resolvable ever in the repo created during the integration testing phase) so the ITs themselves wouldn't have to: a. adjust to new plugin versions in order to run b

[vote result] release maven-eclipse-plugin 2.3 (second try)

2006-12-20 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
The vote has ended, with 5 positive votes from PMC members. The maven eclipse plugin will be released with version 2.3. Jason, I will leave the actual release to you as discussed, you can now proceed. (about the way the plugin is tested: I totally agree that installing a test version into the l

Re: maven-eclipse-plugin release: vote result and follow up (was: [vote] release maven-eclipse-plugin)

2006-12-20 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
fact-filters -> will be moved out of sandbox > and released as 1.0-alpha-1 > > > > fabrizio > > > > On 12/11/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I was already planning to start a vote, so a +1 from me since we >> already waited too lon

Re: [vote] release maven-eclipse-plugin 2.3 (second try)

2006-12-17 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
at 2:59 PM 16 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > Dependencies used by the maven-eclipse-plugin have been released and a > stable revision for a vote has been set. > > I'd like to restart a vote based on: > - svn rev. 487861 > - snapshot deployed at > http://people.apache.org/

Re: [vote] release maven-ear-plugin (second try)

2006-12-16 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 12/16/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd like to release maven-ear-plugin 2.3 [1]. This release includes: * Support of classifier * Automatic generation of JBoss specific deployment descriptor (jboss-app.xml) * Support of exploded modules * File name mappin

[vote] release maven-eclipse-plugin 2.3 (second try)

2006-12-16 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Dependencies used by the maven-eclipse-plugin have been released and a stable revision for a vote has been set. I'd like to restart a vote based on: - svn rev. 487861 - snapshot deployed at http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/2.3-SNAP

maven-eclipse-plugin release: vote result and follow up (was: [vote] release maven-eclipse-plugin)

2006-12-16 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
sed as 1.0-alpha-1 maven-common-artifact-filters -> will be moved out of sandbox and released as 1.0-alpha-1 fabrizio On 12/11/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was already planning to start a vote, so a +1 from me since we already waited too long and added so many chan

Re: Maven-timestamp-plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
FYI here you can find a similar plugin which can be used to set various properties for resource filtering (timestamp/date, a "decorated" version number...). This is actually only used for Magnolia builds but maybe it could be useful to someone else: http://svn.magnolia.info/svn/maven-plugins/ (re

Re: maven2 repository of eclipse jars

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 12/11/06, Tom Huybrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In any Eclipse install, each Import-Package is provided by at least one bundle, and you can make a POM dependency on that bundle. It is quite easy to implement this by feeding all bundles in the install into the resolver and having it calcula

Re: maven2 repository of eclipse jars

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 12/11/06, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a (recently proposed/adopted) version numbering spec that describes using the qualifier segment to distinguish between release, integration, and nightly builds. See here for the details: I can see that the docs outline rules in choos

Re: [vote] release maven-eclipse-plugin

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 12/11/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: did you finally remove the usage of a parent pom for install-files? that made it easier to add information to all the artifacts than regenerate all poms yes, at the moment no parent is used. It's a minor change, I could turn it on before th

Re: maven2 repository of eclipse jars

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Graham On 12/11/06, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: These two features together, with some scripting and a place to host the repository, is in theory all that would be needed to make eclipse jars automatically available to maven users. I think that at the moment having a manually-

Re: [vote] release maven-ear-plugin

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 12/11/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd like to release maven-ear-plugin 2.3 [1]. This release includes: * Support of classifier * Automatic generation of JBoss specific deployment descriptor (jboss-app.xml) * Support of exploded modules * File name mapping

Re: svn commit: r485665 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-source-plugin/pom.xml

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 12/11/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It was needed, then I woke up the next morning and had a better way to do it without requiring an upgrade. cool, thanks for the clarification... you should sleep more :) fabrizio

Re: svn commit: r485665 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-source-plugin/pom.xml

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 12/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Log: o updating to released parent and fall back to released plexus-archiver Can I ask why a snapshot versions of plexus archiver was used before? When I see a dependency upgraded to a snapshot I assume there is really a good valid reaso

Re: [vote] release maven-eclipse-plugin

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
son. On 11 Dec 06, at 5:02 AM 11 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: > I was already planning to start a vote, so a +1 from me since we > already waited too long and added so many changes and enhancements > lately. > > Anyway, as usual there are a couple of things that need to be

Re: [vote] maven release process ( gpg / javadoc / site / source / remote-resources ) plugins.

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Ok, I think that for the maven-site-plugin the removal of the dependency from maven 2.1 is a prerequisite for this vote? Also, does this mean we are voting for a release of doxia-decoration-model, doxia-site-renderer, maven-reporting-api (used by site, not sure which of them should be rolled back

Re: [vote] release maven-eclipse-plugin

2006-12-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
I was already planning to start a vote, so a +1 from me since we already waited too long and added so many changes and enhancements lately. Anyway, as usual there are a couple of things that need to be done before: - license headers needs to be updated and added where missing - we will have to wa

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-tree

2006-12-09 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Joakim, Daniel Kulp wrote: > 3) No LICENSE of NOTICE file in the resulting jar (may need to wait for > Jason's changes) On 12/7/06, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This has been corrected in subversion. [maven-dependency-tree]$ mvn -PsharedResources clean package I see that now

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-tree

2006-12-08 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 12/7/06, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to get maven-dependency-tree out of SNAPSHOT mode. I'm proposing making it 1.0-alpha-1. Found at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-dependency-tree It is used by maven-project-info-reports-pl

Re: Releasing Maven 2.0.5

2006-11-02 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
a big +1, we should definitively try to release more often fabrizio On 11/2/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've talked to several users in the past period about issues in maven 2.0.4. It's getting frustrating to see users having the same problems over and over again due

Re: svn commit: r467331 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsTest

2006-10-30 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 10/30/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are a lot of common things to all eclipse projects like license. Having the license all over all projects is not easy fo fix, change,... Same problem for all common info but given the actual repository policy, also the parent pom can

Re: Mojo testing w/ the verifier

2006-10-29 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Stéphane, On 10/29/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Every time the target directory is cleaned, the tests downloads a lot of stuff maven depends on. This is really a waste of time and bandwidth. .. For the second one, I think we need a clean solution for this use case. The E

Re: svn commit: r467331 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsTest

2006-10-28 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi, On 10/24/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what is the benefit of having a parent pom? I would prefer keeping > poms self-contained, an empty parent seems useless at the moment (all > the values comes from the OSGI manifest). On 10/24/06, Carlos

Re: svn commit: r468338 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/writers/EclipseOSGiManifestWriter.java

2006-10-27 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 10/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Author: carlos URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468338 Log: Add todo to move OSGi manifest work to use Felix The main reason to create a different goal is that the Felix osgi plugin actually generates the manifest during pa

Re: svn commit: r467331 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsTest

2006-10-24 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
be taken now... PS. and a reminder, probably you already know that: you know that metadata will be absolutely required for eclipse artifacts? Transitive dependencies, coming from the osgi manifest, are usually declared with a version range and dependency resolution will fail if metadata are

Re: svn commit: r467331 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsTest

2006-10-24 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Carlos, On 10/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Author: carlos Date: Tue Oct 24 06:36:54 2006 New Revision: 467331 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=467331 Log: > Use smaller groups and a parent pom for eclipse projects what is the benefit of having a parent

Re: [vote] Release Maven Changes Plugin 2.0-beta-2

2006-09-06 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1, recent snapshots worked fine for me, it deserves a release fabrizio On 9/6/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello The changes plugin has not had a release since it was moved here from the Mojo project. Since then 49 issues has been closed: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Is

Re: svn commit: r440170 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-artifact-manager/pom.xml

2006-09-05 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 9/5/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it's just a limitation in how depMgmt is handled in the bootstrap. you are right, I checked locally and it looks like it's ignored when bootstrapping. I also had to add the test scope to the easymock dependency to make it work as expect

Re: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-53

2006-09-04 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Kenney On 9/4/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are 2 classloaders created - one for surefire itself, containing surefire code and the testing framework; the second one contains only the test dependencies from the POM. If your annotations can't be found, they're missing f

Re: Status of maven-surefire-plugin & TestNG

2006-09-03 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 9/3/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-surefire- plugin/ the bug is in surefire-booter, do a: rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/surefire/surefire-booter/ ... and it will work fabrizio ---

Re: Status of maven-surefire-plugin & TestNG

2006-09-03 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
ce you will not be able to run TestNG tests, due to the regression caused by the change in surefire booter classloading. As said, this works in the version deployed on the apache snapshot repository with has been built with a previous revision. fabrizio --jason On Sep 3, 2006, at 12:14 AM, Fa

Re: Status of maven-surefire-plugin & TestNG

2006-09-03 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
The 2.8 SNAPSHOT version was just an unofficial release that was deployed while the testng support in official one (2.3-SNAPSHOT) was broken. Now the patches needed for testNg support have been incorporated and the "official" surefire plugin works *ehm worked* fine with TestNg. "Worked" because i

Re: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-53

2006-09-03 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Jesse, first of all thanks for your patches for the surefire TestNG provider and for your help here... I recently moved to TestNG for a couple of projects and I will definitively try to make surefire support more robust. I committed a few long standing patches, but the commit for http://jira.

Re: svn commit: r431626 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-project-info-reports-plugin/pom.xml

2006-08-16 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 8/16/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This seems like a bad thing. Can we work around it? The dependency on wagon API 2.0-beta2 was introduced by the code for the new dependency location detail (disabled by default): http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-55 there is a single metho

Re: Progress update Re: [VOTE] Rename repository manager

2006-08-14 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 for Archivist fabrizio On 8/14/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We currently have: Curator: 13 Librarian: 2 Archiva: 7 (this is assuming Martin and Joakim voted for Archiva) While I said 72 hours, that fell over the weekend so I'll look at this again in 12 hours. I'm starting

Re: [vote] Release Maven Parent POM v4

2006-08-13 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 8/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Currently, v2 of the parent does not have the correct paths to upload to, but v3 includes the CPD check which is breaking at least the Maven build and the IDEA plugin. I would like to propose that we release v4 which is a sta

Re: [discuss] A new name for the repository manager?

2006-08-01 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Fabrice, On 8/1/06, Fabrice Bellingard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What's more, in the French collective unconscious, "concierge" can unfortunately have a pejorative meaning. ops, here in Italy it doesn't have such bad meaning... "concierge" it's more usually associated to hotel assistants (

Re: [discuss] A new name for the repository manager?

2006-07-31 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
[EMAIL PROTECTED] could be ok, I don't think length is a problem. Anyway, I agree that finding a better name for reposiory manager would be nice... I'll start with a first proposal: what about "Concierge"? :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concierge A concierge (French), in French apartment build

Re: [vote] Promote maven-changelog-plugin and maven-changes-plugin out of the sandbox

2006-07-26 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 for moving them out of the sandbox now fabrizio On 7/25/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Here's the status of things: maven-changelog-plugin - 2.0-beta-1 was released back at mojo - No non-SNAPSHOT release at Apache since the move from mojo - 25 issues fixed for 2.0 relea

Re: svn commit: r421601 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/pom.xml

2006-07-23 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
done, http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/doxia/doxia-site-renderer/1.0-alpha-9-SNAPSHOT/ fabrizio On 7/23/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: trygvis > Date: Thu Jul 13 05:25:18 2006 > New Revision: 421601 > > URL: h

Re: [vote] Dennis Lundberg as a Maven Committer

2006-07-20 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 7/20/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose Dennis Lundberg as a Maven committer. It's already a committer on maven plugins and maven sandbox. He has been doing a good job on maven plugins and on the m1 -> m2 converter and he'd like to continu

Re: Please review maven-eclipse-plugin

2006-07-18 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Great work Edwin, the site looks great, I only have one comment not directly related to the eclipse plugin documentation but to the pages automatically generated for the plugin goals: There are a few parameters that are actually declared as @component and @readonly that shows up as "Optional para

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1

2006-06-17 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 6/15/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to release the 2.0.1 with only one bug fix, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-2 I know there are some pending issues but until somebody has time to go for them releasing 2.0.1 will help avoid the innumerable times pe

Re: [vote] move maven-archiver from components to shared

2006-06-12 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 6/12/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I propose that we move v2.1 of maven-archiver to the /shared/ area of SVN. I think we should leave it on the branch for now, though. This will allow it it's own release cycle, so that plugins can depend on it sooner than Maven rel

ApacheCON europe, anybody there?

2006-06-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi, will anybody from the maven team be at ApacheCon in Dublin? I see that at least Jason will be there (great!), but nobody signed up for the Hackathon yet... just courius, I will be there at least for the first 2 days, and hope to meet you there... (and just a few days before there is also the

Re: [vote] Dennis Lundberg as a Maven Plugins committer

2006-06-04 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 6/4/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dennis is already a committer over at Jakarta Commons and has been doing a good job submitting patches to Maven plugins and documentation, and has been hanging around here for the longest time. I propose we give him commit access t

Re: [vote] Release Maven Project Info Reports 2.0

2006-05-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 5/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: based on: maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0-beta-4-20060510.110344-4 (r405712) This also depends on a release of doxia. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 - To unsubscri

Re: [VOTE] release maven-resources-plugin 2.2

2006-05-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 5/9/06, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to call a vote to release the maven-resources-plugin version 2.2 +1 [] 0 [] -1 [] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [vote] Release Release plugin 2.0-beta-5

2006-05-11 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 Great work! fabrizio On 5/9/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, that's not a typo. I'd like to vote to release the release plugin. It has been completely rewritten since you last met it and now has over 250 unit tests covering everything. Nearly all of the JIRA issues have been

Re: [vote] release Maven Surefire Plugin 2.2 and Surefire 2.0

2006-05-03 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 5/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader has change somewhat. Vote open for 72 hours, based on: maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and 2.0-20060501.172351-2 (r398639) [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 --

Re: Missing unit tests

2006-04-27 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 4/27/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabrizio, have you seen this? Yes, sorry for the delay but I will fix it asap... I was away in the last few days. I will add new tests for the added mojo: when I originally wrote it code coverage was 0 for the repository plugin (all the test

Re: [VOTE] Release Clover plugin 2.1

2006-04-10 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 4/8/06, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've made quite a lot of improvements to the Clover plugin and I'd like to > release it. It's all the more urgent that the current released clover plugin > has its Clover license expired. > > Release Notes - Maven 2.x Clov

[vote result] release maven 2 eclipse plugin 2.2

2006-04-10 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Vote result: 3 binding +1 (me, Emmanuel, John) I will take care of publishing the release shortly fabrizio On 4/6/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on: > maven-eclipse-plugin-2.2-20060406.203721-2.jar > I would like to release version 2.2 of the maven 2

Re: [vote] release maven 2 eclipse plugin 2.2

2006-04-07 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
> Where is the snapshot repos, so that I can test it ? http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/ fabrizio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[vote] release maven 2 eclipse plugin 2.2

2006-04-06 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Based on: maven-eclipse-plugin-2.2-20060406.203721-2.jar I would like to release version 2.2 of the maven 2 eclipse plugin. This release introduces several changes in the artifact resolution code (it doesn't require anymore to have installed artifacts for referenced reactor projects) and reverts th

Re: Sharing code between mvn IDE plugins (eclipse and idea)

2006-04-06 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi, > > I think collecting all the code used for IDE work is a good idea. But I > > think we should try not only to collect common code for the Maven 2 > > plugins but also for the IDE extensions as much of the same code could > > be shared. Sure, also IDE extensions will have lots of code to sha

Re: [vote] (2) Maven 2.0.4 Release

2006-04-06 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
No problems or regression found, my +1 fabrizio On 4/6/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again, > > I've corrected two regressions that popped up: one in 2.0.3, the other > in the original 2.0.4 RC. > > Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting. > > Let's do another 7

Re: Milos Klient as a committer

2006-04-01 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 3/31/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Just giving all devs a heads up that I discussed adding Milos as a > committer on Maven for his work on the embedder and the Netbeans plugin. > There were enough +1s on the PMC list to bring Milos in but wanted to > give

Sharing code between mvn IDE plugins (eclipse and idea)

2006-04-01 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi, I recently noticed a lot of duplicated effort in order to implement similar things in the eclipse and idea plugins. Downloading of source artifacts and javadocs has been reimplemented in the idea one, and I recently took off some bits of the custom artifact resolution used in the idea plugin an

Re: [vote] Release surefire plugin 2.1.3 and surefire 1.5.3

2006-04-01 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 4/1/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please vote for these releases that include several bugfixes, mainly > to improve the support of test forking. > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel > http://ji

Re: [VOTE] Release compiler plugin 2.0.1

2006-03-29 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 3/28/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please vote to release the maven compiler plugin 2.0.1 > > Snapshot has been deployed as maven-compiler-plugin-2.0.1-20060328.105412-2 > > Issues fixed > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11130&fi

Re: [vote] Release Maven Source plugin 2.0.1

2006-03-29 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 3/29/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vote open for 72 hours, based on: > maven-source-plugin 2.0.1-20060329.084749-1 (r389412) > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11147&fixfor=12492 > > Cheers, > Brett >

Re: [vote] Jesse McConnell as a Maven Plugins committer

2006-03-28 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 3/28/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think we all agree we need more keen people helping out with plugins! > > Jesse has been contributing on the users list and mojo project for some > time, and has recently contributed several patches to the Apache Maven >

  1   2   3   4   5   >