Hi,
For what it's worth, I would really like to see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1935 /
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/389 merged. It adds support
for the SessionLauncher API in JUnit 5. We rely heavily on this API to
prevent expensive components being recreated fo
e per fork.
I've submitted the PR against surefire:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/389
Best regards,
Emond
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 9:14 PM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> Hi Tibor,
>
> I've reworked the commit to keep the JUnit version at 1.3 and use
> reflecti
Sep 13, 2021 at 7:51 AM Marc Philipp wrote:
> Hi Emond,
>
> could you please elaborate why the LauncherSessionListener approach
> doesn’t work for forkCount=1 for Arquillian?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marc
>
> On Sunday, Sep 12, 2021 at 9:37 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> e
Hi Marc,
Thanks for the links to the documentation. This really helps for my
Arquillian-Spock extension. It's good to know the LauncherSession was
introduced to solve this issue.
The problem I see with this new API is that it requires the extension to
explicitly make use of it. For example, the J
Hi Tibor,
I've reworked the commit to keep the JUnit version at 1.3 and use
reflection to get the session. Also, I've fixed the issue with the session
used for scanning tests in main thread that remained open. The formatting
is now in line with the checkstyle rules and all tests pass.
https://gith
st regards,
Emond
Op vr 10 sep. 2021 23:00 schreef Tibor Digana :
> Hi Emond,
>
> Are you looking for this?
>
> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/blob/main/documentation/src/test/java/example/UsingTheLauncherDemo.java#L86-L96
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:49 PM E
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:15 PM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:41 PM Christian Stein
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:27 PM Emond Papegaaij <
>> emond.papega...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> For now, I think the Launch
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:41 PM Christian Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:27 PM Emond Papegaaij >
> wrote:
>
> For now, I think the LauncherSession is the best way to at least provide
> > some hooks for pre and post fixtures. It shouldn't be too hard to get
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> We have to dig into Junit 5. Surefire is a streamer of classes across the
> forks which is our load balancer. Therefore each class is running
> separately, pre and post fixtures. If the Junit 5 used Java Streamer
> including dome kind of contr
the JUnitPlatformProvider. However, I'm not sure what the
intended audience of LauncherSessionListener is.
Best regards,
Emond
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 12:42 PM Emond Papegaaij
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > First of all, sorry for the lengthy post. I decided to add some context
&g
out on this one and point me in the right
direction, as we like to upgrade our test frameworks and this is blocking
us at the moment.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
[1] Arquillian extension for Spock Framework 2:
https://github.com/topicusonderwijs/arquillian-testrunner-spock/tree/spock-2.0-juni
11 matches
Mail list logo
