On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> * Source control is not an Apache distribution and hence we do not need to
> have LICENSE and NOTICE files in source control, it can be a nice
> convenience, but there is no *requirement*.
I think perhaps you're looking for clear lines wh
doop World".
That's a separate issue from the "Maven" software product trademark.
Let's please not confuse them. The action I described and the
attribution the ASF seeks is related to the product trademark, not any
service mark.
> ... Cloudera, a company founded by
For many months the board has been asking the Maven project to obtain
proper attribution from Sonatype for Apache's "Maven" trademark.
Sonatype has thus far failed to comply. The Sonatype website states
only that "Apache Maven" is a trademark of the ASF, not that "Maven"
alone is also a trademark
