Re: making docs and tests suck less

2006-03-13 Thread David Sag
see my comments inline below but in general +1 Kind regards, Dave Sag   Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07-03-2006 21:10:53: > This is not too long, and important. Please read. > > I've just spent some time discussing this on users@, and felt it was > time to bring it here to l

Re: [PROPOSAL] Integration testing proposal for Maven 2.0.x

2006-01-27 Thread David Sag
I prefer 'itest' to 'it', and prefer 'integration' even more. Kind regards, Dave Sag   Tomasz Pik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26-01-2006 23:21:50: > On 26/01/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have the following concerns: > > - adding an "it" scope. I haven't seen expla

Re: [vote] release maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.0-beta-2

2005-11-30 Thread David Sag
A very definite +1 Kind regards, Dave Sag   Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29-11-2005 20:22:50: > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 16:38 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > > (m2-dev list doesn't exist any more :) > > > > +1 for a beta including these. > > +1 > > > When we get to releasing

Re: [vote] surefire/maven-surefire-plugin release

2005-11-29 Thread David Sag
Does this mean that I'll finally be able to specify enable-assertions for my unit tests without having to remind every developer who downloads my code to set MAVEN_OPTS=-ea I hope so. Kind regards, Dave Sag   Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28-11-2005 03:02:25: > Hi, > > Sure

Re: [vote] release maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.0-beta-2

2005-11-28 Thread David Sag
I give this idea a +10! we have another presentation on thurs, following our successful presentation last week, and a almost-properly working checkstyle plugin would add icing to the cake. Kind regards, Dave Sag   Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29-11-2005 06:38:36: > (m2-dev l

RE: JIRA projects for m2 plugins?

2005-11-16 Thread David Sag
27;s not working (version issues). :-) > >   > > -Vincent > >   > >   _   > > From: David Sag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 16 novembre 2005 09:03 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: JIRA projects for m2 plugins? > >   > > > I wo

Re: JIRA projects for m2 plugins?

2005-11-16 Thread David Sag
I would vote to make a new jira component within the maven 2 project for each new plugin. Kind regards, Dave Sag   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15-11-2005 21:27:39: > I think we should vote to solve this asap, I believe these are the options: > > [ ] create a new project for new m2 plugins

Re: [ANN][M1] Findbugs 1.0 Release

2005-11-02 Thread David Sag
Fantastic - any word on a maven 2 version? Kind regards, Dave Sag   Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/11/2005 03:30:32 PM: > The maven-plugins team is pleased to announce the FindBugs Plug-in 1.0 > release! > > http://maven-plugins.sourceforge.net/maven-findbugs-plugin > > A plu

Re: bringing surefire and doxia to Maven

2005-10-31 Thread David Sag
good idea. Kind regards, Dave Sag   Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/11/2005 02:15:12 AM: > Hi, > > Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment > with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0. > > With one recent exception the comm

Re: my plugin is invoked okay directly but not at all as part of site.

2005-10-25 Thread David Sag
ation only specific to build executions in the build section. > > Hope this helps. > > - Brett > > David Sag wrote: > > > > still more on this. > > > > if i move the configuration from out of the eexcutions and up into the > > main plugin thus: > &

Re: my plugin is invoked okay directly but not at all as part of site.

2005-10-24 Thread David Sag
                                              merge                               the configuration is recongnised okay.  but that's no good for me as i need different configs for different goals. Kind regards, Dave Sag   David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/10/2005 04:05:09 PM:

Re: my plugin is invoked okay directly but not at all as part of site.

2005-10-24 Thread David Sag
confused? Kind regards, Dave Sag   David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/10/2005 03:55:25 PM: > > Dear People, > > My mojo is built and installed. > > I have specified the goal and phase thus: >  * @goal merge >  * @phase validate > > I have

my plugin is invoked okay directly but not at all as part of site.

2005-10-24 Thread David Sag
Dear People, My mojo is built and installed. I have specified the goal and phase thus:  * @goal merge  * @phase validate I have added a reference to the block of a shell project thus:     com.davesag     qalab-plugin                         qalab-blah             validate                

[m2] how to report from a specific plugin goal?

2005-10-24 Thread David Sag
I am writing a QALab plugin for Maven2. Its goals are meant to be run via continuous integration machine rather than by a specific developer. To function it needs the XML reports from one or more of the following: Checkstyle, PMD, Simian, FindBugs. For now I am just focusing on merging the Che