see my comments inline below but in
general +1
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07-03-2006
21:10:53:
> This is not too long, and important. Please read.
>
> I've just spent some time discussing this on users@, and felt it was
> time to bring it here to l
I prefer 'itest' to 'it', and prefer
'integration' even more.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Tomasz Pik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26-01-2006
23:21:50:
> On 26/01/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have the following concerns:
> > - adding an "it" scope. I haven't seen expla
A very definite +1
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 29-11-2005 20:22:50:
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 16:38 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
> > (m2-dev list doesn't exist any more :)
> >
> > +1 for a beta including these.
>
> +1
>
> > When we get to releasing
Does this mean that I'll finally be
able to specify enable-assertions for my unit tests without having to remind
every developer who downloads my code to set MAVEN_OPTS=-ea
I hope so.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28-11-2005
03:02:25:
> Hi,
>
> Sure
I give this idea a +10!
we have another presentation on thurs,
following our successful presentation last week, and a almost-properly
working checkstyle plugin would add icing to the cake.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29-11-2005
06:38:36:
> (m2-dev l
27;s not working (version issues). :-)
>
>
>
> -Vincent
>
>
>
> _
>
> From: David Sag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 16 novembre 2005 09:03
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: JIRA projects for m2 plugins?
>
>
>
>
> I wo
I would vote to make a new jira component
within the maven 2 project for each new plugin.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15-11-2005 21:27:39:
> I think we should vote to solve this asap, I believe these are the
options:
>
> [ ] create a new project for new m2 plugins
Fantastic - any word on a maven 2 version?
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/11/2005
03:30:32 PM:
> The maven-plugins team is pleased to announce the FindBugs Plug-in
1.0
> release!
>
> http://maven-plugins.sourceforge.net/maven-findbugs-plugin
>
> A plu
good idea.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/11/2005
02:15:12 AM:
> Hi,
>
> Doxia and Surefire were small projects started at Codehaus to experiment
> with new technology that has since been used from Maven 2.0.
>
> With one recent exception the comm
ation only specific to build executions in the build section.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> - Brett
>
> David Sag wrote:
> >
> > still more on this.
> >
> > if i move the configuration from out of the eexcutions and up
into the
> > main plugin thus:
> &
merge
the configuration is recongnised okay.
but that's no good for me as i need different configs for different
goals.
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/10/2005
04:05:09 PM:
confused?
Kind regards,
Dave Sag
David Sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/10/2005
03:55:25 PM:
>
> Dear People,
>
> My mojo is built and installed.
>
> I have specified the goal and phase thus:
> * @goal merge
> * @phase validate
>
> I have
Dear People,
My mojo is built and installed.
I have specified the goal and phase
thus:
* @goal merge
* @phase validate
I have added a reference to the
block of a shell project thus:
com.davesag
qalab-plugin
qalab-blah
validate
I am writing a QALab plugin for Maven2.
Its goals are meant to be run via continuous
integration machine rather than by a specific developer.
To function it needs the XML reports
from one or more of the following:
Checkstyle, PMD, Simian, FindBugs.
For now I am just focusing on merging
the Che
14 matches
Mail list logo