org/jira/browse/MPOM-35
On a side note,... Happy new year to all! :)
-David
On Dec 30, 2011, at 2:22 AM, Ansgar Konermann wrote:
> Am 27.09.2011 14:48 schrieb "David Blevins" :
>>
>> Is it a known issue that the release plugin does not honor the
> -Darguments?
>&
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:09 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Did some more digging and it seems the issue is in the apache-10 parent pom.
> If you alter it like so, the arguments are passed as expected:
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-release
ion under
>> -DskipTests=true -DfailIfNoTests=false
>>
>> Perhaps someone else can say _why_ the m-r-p is set up so you can't set
> this on the command line?
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2011, at 5:40 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>&
Is it a known issue that the release plugin does not honor the -Darguments?
Specifically, I'm attempting to:
mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true -Darguments="-DskipTests=true
-DfailIfNoTests=false"
It takes 40 minutes to get through a dryRun with tests on. We still have
several kinks in the
ljnelson wrote:
>
> Now Ken Saks, spec author for EJB 3.1 is saying sure, whoops, Glassfish
> has
> a problem, it doesn't consult the *effective* classpath because it doesn't
> take into consideration Manifest.MF Class-Path entries. Fine.
>
> But *then *he says something WAY more troubling: t
luck I'll
get a closer look at the hackathon tomorrow.
The good news (sort of) is that Surefire has very few changes
committed since the last release, so a release should be reasonably
straightforward.
- Brett
On 02/11/2009, at 1:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Is there any committer ou
Is there any committer out there who has the time to review and commit
this patch?
Would be happy to issue a "thank you" blog post in the OpenEJB blog to
the committer who gets this functionality in :) Would be a big bonus
for OpenEJB/OpenJPA unit testers to get this or something like it i
* Dain Sundstrom
* Dan Diephouse
* Dan North
* David Blevins
* Dennis Lundberg
* Edward Povazan
* Emmanuel Venisse
* Eugene Kuleshov
* Guillaume Laforge
* Jacques Morel
* James E. Ervin
* James Macgill
* Jason Dillon
* Jason van Zyl
* Jody Garnett
A patch would be great!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:36 AM, "Arnaud HERITIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Our reports on votes are down :
http://www.sonatype.org/~j2ee-hudson/reports/
https://ci.sonatype.org/view/Reports/
It's certainly a Jira upgrade which broke the xml-
Currently, it's a bit of a trick trying to get a javaagent in use with
your test cases. Here's the boiler plate pom text:
http://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJBx30/javaagent-with-maven-surefire.html
It'd be really great if we could just do it like this:
org.apache.maven.plugins
On Aug 10, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Dennis,
Just a follow up on the reports.
The reports generated by Swizzle are here (I restored them):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/reports
And they are checked out in the home directory of Hudson on the CI
server.
On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I think it's OK to do a release of it now, especially if it's
blocking 2.0.10.
I've tested it with CXF and it looks OK there. No regressions in
the dep-reduced pom. It would be NICE if the OpenEJB folks could
do a quick test with their
On Mar 14, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The additions Dain has made to XBean adds things I was just never
interested in like constructor injection and bean factories.
Also xbean-reflect "thinks" in java.lang.reflect.Type terms so it's
easy to add converters that are generics-awar
David
On Jan 18, 2008 12:15 PM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is there any way to get or make a tree of Artifact objects?
I've tried taking the list of Artifacts returned from
project.getArtifacts(), then wrapping them in my own "node" object
and
relinkin
It occurs to me I'd really like the ability to apply exclusions at a
more general level than each individual dep. We have ton of excludes
(136), some deps want to pull in the world, and a very good chunk of
them are redundant. Doing a grep/sort/uniq looks like 68 of them are
redundant.
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi David,
On 19/01/2008, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Still digging through that code, but hopefully you can answer this
question real quick. The resulting structure is definitely a tree as
opposed to a graph (which could b
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Blevins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any way to get or make a tree of Artifact objects?
I've tried taking the list of Artifacts returned from
project.getArtifacts(), then wrapping them in m
Is there any way to get or make a tree of Artifact objects?
I've tried taking the list of Artifacts returned from
project.getArtifacts(), then wrapping them in my own "node" object and
relinking them via the info in the dependency trail. This works fine
except that there is some informatio
dkulp wrote:
>
> I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
> for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
>
OpenEJB, actually. And here's my +1! (non-binding)
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--release-ma
Mauro, is it possible you can publish a new snapshot or update the
perms on the metadata files?
-David
On Jan 15, 2008, at 9:02 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Thanks for reviewing!
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
David,
I&#
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Thanks for reviewing!
On Jan 15, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
David,
I'm OK with you committing this except for a few minor nits:
1) Javadoc for the parameter you added. The description about the
includes/excludes needs
&& !isFiltered(jarFilters, name))
Which would prevent any addDirectory, addRemappedClass, or addResource
calls. Could wrap that one if/else but then we'd still get
directories from excluded resources/classes.
-David
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, David Blevins wrote:
I need the a
I need the ability to include/exclude classes from certain artifacts
when creating the shaded jar. In OpenEJB we have a situation where
one of the jars we are adding to the shaded jar contains a class also
part of another jar added to the shade. The class in question truly
belongs to one
dfabulich wrote:
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> PS Since it's so close to the Gregorian New Year, I'm probably not going
> to actually deploy the release until Jan 3 at the earliest, even if the
> vote passes. :-)
>
Where are things at with this? Looking to cut a release of OpenEJB which
On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Jeff Jensen wrote:
Just not understanding yet the Maven
plans for wiki/site usage. My fear, obviously, is continued
"separate"
works, as some people I helped with Maven have a "not happy-out-of-
the-box
experience", which includes scattered docs - I always have
A bit ago a created a client for Jira which may be useful:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SWIZZLE/Swizzle+Jira
http://swizzle.codehaus.org/swizzle-jira/
-David
On Jul 3, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
+1. Actually I thought there was already a project for this but I was
probably a
I need to create an assembly that doesn't put everything under a
artifactId-version style directory; meaning I want it to unzip right
into ./ with no directory prefix such as:
$ unzip openejb-tomcat-3.0.1.zip
deflating ...
./conf/openejb.xml
./server/lib/openejb-core-3.0.1.jar
./server/lib/op
38 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
What about carlos's suggestion?
I'm sorry, but i can't include continuum profiles in 1.0.3
Emmanuel
David Blevins a écrit :
We have too much corba tie-in to the Sun ORB which makes it so we
can't compile a few chunks of the code or test it on a
ument on compiler
plugin
David Blevins a écrit :
Sounds like a scary m1-style hack ... not going there.
Second install it is
-David
On Feb 8, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
What about compiler and test plugins options like fork,
executable, ...
On 2/8/06, David Blevins &l
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-419?page=comments#action_58739
]
David Blevins commented on CONTINUUM-419:
-
And failed builds.
I noticed you now get a link on successful builds. Not to concerned about
checking why something was
So i find myself needing jdk 1.4 for 90% of what i have in the
geronimo continuum install, some of those actually can't compile with
1.5 because of corba/vm ties.
But alas I do need 1.5 now for at least two projects.
Do i pretty much have to setup another continuum install for this?
-David
s.
-john
David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 12, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
David Blevins a écrit :
On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features.
I tried to use osuser but this framework is crappy :
[...]
I
I like this more and more.
-David
On Jan 14, 2006, at 6:12 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:13 +0100, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features.
I haven't looked at osuser in particular yet, but I still think it
might
work for
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-299?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-299:
--
Attachment: activeio-2.1.pom.patch
> Pom for activeio-2.1
>
>
> Key: MEV-299
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org
Pom for activeio-2.1
Key: MEV-299
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-299
Project: Maven Evangelism
Type: Improvement
Components: Missing POM
Reporter: David Blevins
Made a valid pom for activeio-2.1
--
This message is
On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features.
I tried to use osuser but this framework is crappy :
[...]
I looked at seraph too. This project seems to be interesting, it's
used by confluence and jira. It seems we have al
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-275?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-275:
--
Attachment: castor-1.0M1.patch
> Castor dependencies
> ---
>
> Key: MEV-275
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-275
Castor dependencies
---
Key: MEV-275
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-275
Project: Maven Evangelism
Type: Improvement
Components: Dependencies
Reporter: David Blevins
Added some of the missing deps for castor to run
--
This
Just to jump in. I don't really see the limitation with the current
ContinuumStore object. In fact, I would say the only real issue I
see around it is that too many components are dependent upon it which
makes Continuum somewhat database-centric. In most cases these
components are just u
I'm still not sure how having multiple build definitions comes into
play. I see now real way to use anything but the default.
It's also a little confusing how the dont-execute-the-build-if-the-
source-hasnt-changed-feature comes into play. They all have their
own schedule and the source co
: David Blevins
Priority: Minor
The geronimo build output is around 6 megs and little html text area with
scroll bars is not the best way to search it and view it. It would be great to
have a 'Download as text' link from the results page so that it would be
possible to download the bu
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=comments#action_50908 ]
David Blevins commented on MEV-193:
---
Here is the stacktrace you get without the concurrent jar. Comes from a test
case that uses ActiveMQ
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
EDU/oswego
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-193:
--
Attachment: activemq-core-3.2.pom.patch2
ActiveMQ core requires the concurrent library as it states on their website.
> Patched activemq-core-3.2.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=all ]
David Blevins reopened MEV-193:
---
> Patched activemq-core-3.2.pom
> -
>
> Key: MEV-193
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193
>
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193?page=all ]
David Blevins updated MEV-193:
--
Attachment: activemq-core-3.2.pom.patch
> Patched activemq-core-3.2.pom
> -
>
> Key: MEV-193
> URL: http://ji
Patched activemq-core-3.2.pom
-
Key: MEV-193
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-193
Project: Maven Evangelism
Type: Bug
Components: Invalid POM
Reporter: David Blevins
This pom has javacc-2.1 commented out as it doesn&#
inuum
Type: Improvement
Components: continuum-web
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
Instead, think of allowing ViewCVS or FishEye to be configured and create links.
It is *extremely* annoying the way it is now. On OpenEJB, when a project.xml
file is changed, we get this:
mo
Type: Improvement
Components: continuum-web
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: David Blevins
screen after DeleteNotifier, AddNotifier and similar actions of the project
View page should return you to the project view page, not the list of all
projects. it takes entirely too long to
48 matches
Mail list logo
