Re: current setup is leaking quality: [S1161] "@override" should be used on overriding members

2025-06-07 Thread Claude Warren
As a user.of the various libraries i for one appreciate this effort. Thank you to all who consistantly work on and improve this codebase. LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren On Tue 3 Jun 2025, 13:29 Guillaume Nodet, wrote: > Most of them are afaik. > I spotted a few modules that

Re: Time to ditch Slack?

2025-01-07 Thread Claude Warren
+1 any abandonment of a commercial tool. +1 to the analysis as well. I am a big believer in the truth of the immutable record (mailing list archive) On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 1:26 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > All third party proprietary systems not owned by the Apache Project > come with risk

Re: [DISCUSS] Project member emeritus policy change

2024-10-23 Thread Claude Warren
If the goal here is to simply clarify the metrics on project participation, perhaps we could run one of the tools from CHAOSS that will tell us how many people participate and how (mail list, commits, reviews, etc.) On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 3:20 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > FWIW, if Maven adopts the i

Re: Module paths and tool integrations

2024-10-19 Thread Claude Warren
I would be interested in joining. I have a Java persistence annotation library for RDF that is in dire needs of updating and having such information would me most helpful. Claude On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 8:28 AM Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > > > During Devoxx Nicolai Parlog shared his concern

[Plexus-Utils] MatchPattern(s) Improvement?

2024-10-17 Thread Claude Warren
Greetings, I am using modified MatchPattern, MatchPatterns and SelectorUtils in the new Apache Rat 0.17. I had to modify them because I needed visibility to the matching patterns, and because package private made some extensions impossible. The MatchPatter and MatchPatterns classes are final so

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-10-13 Thread Claude Warren
May i assist in the testing / dev. Or are you far enough along that bringing in a new head will take to much time away with bringing me op to speed? On Sun 13 Oct 2024, 12:55 Michael Osipov, wrote: > On 2024/10/13 11:07:45 Claude Warren wrote: > > Now that Doxia 2.0 is out is there

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-10-13 Thread Claude Warren
Now that Doxia 2.0 is out is there something that has to be done to enable footnotes or are they enabled by default? Thanks, Claude On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 12:31 PM Claude Warren wrote: > Michael, > > Thanks for the note. > > I am willing to spend some time working on a sol

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-07-08 Thread Claude Warren
Michael, Thanks for the note. I am willing to spend some time working on a solution if we can design and acceptable one. Claude On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 4:22 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2024-07-07 um 15:20 schrieb Claude Warren: > > In looking at some of the codebase it seems

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-07-07 Thread Claude Warren
tion approach is available only for Doxia 2.0.0. > > Konrad, can you look into Claude's request and tell us your opinion? > > On 2024/06/24 12:46:16 Claude Warren wrote: > > Michael, > > > > Flexmark has a number of extensions available, but both 1.12.0 and > > 2

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-06-24 Thread Claude Warren
-16 um 15:58 schrieb Claude Warren: > > There is a standard footnote extension available from flexmark, and I > have > > a private branch of 1.12.0 that adds it. It seems to work. Is there any > > reason not to add this? > > > > I want to use it for some commons co

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-06-19 Thread Claude Warren
is will take quite some work I am not willing to do for the 1.x branch. > Maybe someone else can step up. > > Michael > On 2024/06/17 21:15:13 Claude Warren wrote: > > I understand the focus on Doxia 2.0.0, but since all Apache uses 1.x, is > > there any way to cr

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-06-17 Thread Claude Warren
: > Am 2024-06-16 um 15:58 schrieb Claude Warren: > > There is a standard footnote extension available from flexmark, and I > have > > a private branch of 1.12.0 that adds it. It seems to work. Is there any > > reason not to add this? > > > > I want to

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-06-16 Thread Claude Warren
ht be the smoothest way to move this forward. > > Gary > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 10:48 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > > > flexmark is already used by doxia-markdown to perform the markdown > processing . This is just adding an additional extension from flexmark to > the

Re: [doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-06-16 Thread Claude Warren
ues? > > Gary > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2024, 9:58 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > > There is a standard footnote extension available from flexmark, and I have > > a private branch of 1.12.0 that adds it. It seems to work. Is there any > > reason not to add this? >

[doxia] [DISCUSS] adding footnote processing to markdown

2024-06-16 Thread Claude Warren
There is a standard footnote extension available from flexmark, and I have a private branch of 1.12.0 that adds it. It seems to work. Is there any reason not to add this? I want to use it for some commons collections documentation where I want to refer to various published papers. Claude