bout test
framework specific listeners.
> So it's quite easy because it is these two lines to add in
> JUnitPlatformProvider. Please improve the coverage with new unit tests and
> integration tests.
> Thx.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:01 AM Benedikt Ritter
Hello,
I'm currently working on a Maven extension that needs to be notified of
what happened during test execution in Surefire. Currently it is only
possible to register test framework specific listeners via the
setting [1]. However there is also the org.apache.maven.surefire.report.
RunListener
Hello,
Am Sa., 27. Apr. 2019 um 18:04 Uhr schrieb Enrico Olivelli <
eolive...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345433&styleName=Text&projectId=12317927&Create=Create&atl_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C568123541489d632001256
Am Do., 25. Apr. 2019 um 22:08 Uhr schrieb Enrico Olivelli <
eolive...@gmail.com>:
> FYI
> I have staged the release artifacts at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1500/
> and created the tag
>
> but I have to do some burocratic steps in JIRA before sending the
> official
> hth
> Olivier
>
Cool, thank you!
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 17:04, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to try my work project with the latest SNAPSHOT of the
> > maven-javadoc-plugin. The repository has 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT as latest version
&
Hi,
I'd like to try my work project with the latest SNAPSHOT of the
maven-javadoc-plugin. The repository has 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT as latest version
[1] but the ASF snapshot repository only has 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT [2]. Any chance
of getting 3.1.1-SNAPSHOT into the snapshot repo?
Thanks!
Benedikt
[1] https:/
Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 10:50 Uhr schrieb Benedikt Ritter <
brit...@apache.org>:
> Hello,
>
> this is a summary of a video conference call that happened yesterday
> (April 24).
>
Sorry, actually yesterday was April 23... :o)
>
> Topic:
> Discussion about perf
more insights into how Stefan found
the improvements and to better understand what is missing before these
changes be merged.
Attendees of the call:
- Benedikt Ritter (Gradle Inc.)
- Stefan Oehme (Gradle Inc.)
- Robert Scholte (Apache Maven Team)
- Hervé Boutemy (Apache Maven Team; joined about
sitories:
https://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:42 AM Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Am Mi., 13. Feb. 2019 um 17:48 Uhr schrieb Tibor Digana <
> > tibordig...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Is it so a big problem to k
gt; On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 1:27 PM Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Am Di., 12. Feb. 2019 um 08:39 Uhr schrieb Benedikt Ritter <
> > brit...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 18:3
Hello,
Am Di., 12. Feb. 2019 um 08:39 Uhr schrieb Benedikt Ritter <
brit...@apache.org>:
> Hello,
>
> Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019 um 18:39 Uhr schrieb Enrico Olivelli <
> eolive...@gmail.com>:
>
>> In maven coordinates 3.0.0 is different from 3.0.0-M4 (you alre
all the versions.
>
> Btw I will check and try to deploy current master
>
I checked, it didn't help. Maybe the master branch should have
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT as version and only be updated to a milestone version for a
milestone release.
Thank you!
Benedikt
>
> Enrico
>
&g
Hi,
I just realized that the maven-metadata.xml for Surefire in the snapshot
repository [1] does not point to the latest Surefire snapshot. It says that
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT is the latest version but 3.0.0-M4-SNAPSHOT is actually the
latest available snapshot. Is it possible to correct this?
Thanks,
Be
Hello Tibor,
did you have some time to do the rebase and help me get the build to work in
the junit5 branch?
Regards,
Benedikt
> Am 18.10.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Benedikt Ritter :
>
> Hello Tibor,
>
> Sorry for the daily I somehow missed this mail.
>
>> Am 15.10.201
tion test project,
once the build does work again. Currently I’m unable to exec an integration
test on the junit5 branch. Once this is possible again, we can write the
missing tests.
Thank you!
Benedikt
>
>
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:34 AM,
ies have
been downloaded before. Why do I have to define the plugin explicitly to work
in offline mode? It does work in online mode.
Regards,
Benedikt
>
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> Am
Hello,
> Am 08.10.2017 um 15:54 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY :
>
> Le dimanche 8 octobre 2017, 15:37:54 CEST Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>> Hello Hervé
>>
>>> Then I added a pluginManagement section to select version 3.0.2 and re-ran
>>> the test: you&#x
ut having
> > > to build jUDDI
> >
> > This is the wrong mailing list...Users list was the subject about jUDDI
> > ;-)..
> >
> > Not related to Surefire and JUnit 5 ...
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Karl Heinz Marbaise
> > > Cheers
>
R] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please
read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
Since there are only a few dependencies missing, I will run test not in offline
modus on my CI server. But I
Hello Laird
> Am 02.10.2017 um 18:42 schrieb Laird Nelson :
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:53 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> I have a CI Build in GitLab, where I want to define a job that downloads
>> all the artifacts which are needed for the different lifecycle phases
you really need is a repository
>> manager to cache things locally for you. That's the recommended solution
>> any time you feel like you're going to be downloading components more than
>> once...which is really in every instance.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 7:53
Hello,
for over a year now I’m trying to help getting JUnit 5 support into Maven
Surefire. This has been hard since Tibor seems to be the only one maintaining
Maven Surefire and he had to come with other things.
For this reason I’d like to ask other Maven maintainers to help with the JUnit
5 s
Hello Brain,
> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:10 schrieb Brian Fox :
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hello Brian,
>>
>>> Am 20.09.2017 um 23:16 schrieb Brian Fox :
>>>
>>> It's been a really long time, but I recal
o this
> effectively.
I’ve looked through the documentation of the dependency plugin, but I can not
find anything about this. Do you recall where you found that documentation?
Regards,
Benedikt
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
Hi,
as far as I understand it should be possible to call mvn dependency:go-offline
and from there on work in offline mode (mvn -o). I’ve put a minimal example
together [1] that demonstrates that this currently does not work. Am I missing
anything?
Thank you!
Benedikt
[1] https://github.com/b
10, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Tibor Digana-2 [via Maven] <
> ml+s40175n5909755...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> Pls give me time to read it.
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Benedikt Ritter <[hidden email]
>> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5909755
Hey guys,
any thoughts on this?
Benedikt
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Do. 8. Juni 2017 um 15:16:
> Hello,
>
> first of all, I’d like to apologize for not being very active over the
> past few months. I’ve been busy at work and there was ApacheCON… so you
> know how it is :-)
Hello,
first of all, I’d like to apologize for not being very active over the past few
months. I’ve been busy at work and there was ApacheCON… so you know how it is
:-)
I’d like to take some time to review where we’re standing with JUnit 5 support
and what we our next steps will be. Currently
Hi all,
I’d like to give you an update about our progress with regards to the surefire
support of JUnit 5. I didn’t have much time to work on this over the past
couple of month, so please forgive me that it was quite quiet around this topic
lately.
I’ve talked to Tibor about the next steps in
Hello,
Christian Schulte schrieb am Di., 3. Jan. 2017 um 02:57 Uhr:
> Am 01/02/17 um 21:01 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
> >
> >> Christian,
> >>
> >> Please read Tibor's concerns:
> >> - big change,
> >> - near release (with parallel branc
Hello,
at the moment the integration test project has a directory containing
almost all integration tests. The Jira issue related tests are located in a
sub package. The test/resources directory contains all the test projects
with no further ordering. This makes it hard to navigate through the
pro
rtain modules. I really
> hope that by chaining classloaders we can prevent this.
>
Thank you Robert. I've also forwarded this to the JUnit team.
Benedikt
>
> Robert
>
> [1]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-November/010233.html
>
>
Hello again,
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Fr., 18. Nov. 2016 um
08:40 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> I had the pleasure to meet Robert Scholte and Herve Boutemy here at
> ApacheCon in Seville. We talked al little bit about the progress of the
> JUnit 5 integration. This let us to create two sample
Hi,
I had the pleasure to meet Robert Scholte and Herve Boutemy here at
ApacheCon in Seville. We talked al little bit about the progress of the
JUnit 5 integration. This let us to create two sample projects which may
indicate problems both within surefire and within JUnit. We're still
investigatin
Hello,
as you might know, JUnit is EPL licensed. However there is currently an
effort going on to relicense the surefire provider under ALv2 [1]. It looks
like all contributors have accepted the relicensing, so we can incorporate
the provider code soon. Would this be okay for the maven community o
FYI: the JUnit team is working on relicensing their provider code under AL
2.0 so there should not be a problem for us to accept their contribution.
https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/541
BR,
Benedikt
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Di. 4. Okt. 2016 um 19:41:
> Hello Tibor,
>
&
.org/job/maven-surefire/
> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire-windows/
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s40175n5882750...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Tibor Digana <[hidden email]
1] and reference to this POM via parent
> declaration
> >> in your root POM of particular IT having JUnit5 tests.
> >> [1]
> >> https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/master/surefir
> >> e-integration-tests/src/test/resources/pom.xml
> >>
> &g
he old annotations are not
available.
I think this could be a starting point. After we have merged #126 from
GitHub, I can build this on top the parameterized test.
Regards,
Benedikt
>
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s
Hi,
I've had the chance to talk to Marc Philipp from the JUnit team again, and
I'd like to share with you some of our discussions.
First we talked about the progress with the surefire provider:
Currently I've done not much. We have a junit5 branch with a single PR
merged (the JUnit5VersionsIT). F
t;
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Tibor Digana
> Gesendet: Montag, 10. Oktober 2016 08:15:25
> An: dev@maven.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [SUREFIRE] Jenkins job for junit5 branch
>
> Excellent!
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Ma
.Test
@org.junit.api.jupiter.Test
public test()
{
// do something
}
}
Which engine will execute the test? No one knows... So I don't think it's a
good idea to share test classes.
Regards,
Benedikt
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am So., 9. Okt. 2016 um
14:25 Uhr:
> Hello Tibor,
>
> I
>
>
>
>
>
> maven-compiler-plugin
>
>
> ${project.build.directory}/endorsed
>
>
> ${project.build.directory}/endorsed-test
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at
Hello,
I've created a build job for the junit5 branch [1]. It's a copy of the
maven-surefire job with the only difference that it does not publish build
artifacts to the snapshots repository. It maybe possible to configure this
more elegantly by using the Jenkins Pipeline Plugin, but I don't know
cy tests (they call it "vintage").
To make a complete IT suite, we would have to run all the JUnit 4 tests
against the JUnit 5 vintage engine as well.
Lot a work ahead :-)
Regards,
Benedikt
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
tion.
Regards,
Benedikt
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s40175n5882104...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > now that we have a separate branch for the JUnit 5 support in the
> surefire
> > repo, I
Hi,
now that we have a separate branch for the JUnit 5 support in the surefire
repo, I'm asking myself how to much things forward. I've added some
additional IT implementations in my GitHub fork, but they all fail because
the 5.0.0-M2 release of junit-surefire-provider does not implement the
desir
l we seriously consider
moving to Java 8 (we're currently Java 6), but it's good to get some
feedback early.
Thank you!
Benedikt
>
> On 25 September 2016 at 15:20, Robert Scholte
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 16:11:22 +0200, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
le with Java 8. If I understand
correctly, this would be a problem for Maven, right?
Regards,
Benedikt
>
> Robert
>
> [1]
>
> https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-shared-utils/xref/org/apache/maven/shared/utils/io/FileUtils.html#L831
>
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:48:56 +020
ve any concrete plans yet. We're just thinking about it. So I
can't give you any examples yet.
Regards,
Benedikt
>
> Cheers
> Tibor
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s40175n5881450...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
&g
Hi,
at the Apache Commons Project we're currently discussing where we can host
utility classes for working with the features introduced in Java 8. One
proposal add this to Commons Lang [1]. Since Apache Maven makes use of
Commons Lang, I would like to know whether it would be a problem for you if
overed recently. Many colleagues
> in Maven are idle for years and only send some emails but these emails move
> us ahead which is positive as well.
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s40175n5880358...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> &g
Hi,
I'm currently a bit stuck with the JUnit 5 integration, because I don't
really know where it should be going. At first I thought we should just
merge the Integration tests I'm about to write directly to master. But
maybe that's not the best idea. But I don't want to implement the whole
thing i
GitHub, right? :)
> I use IntelliJ IDEA 14.1.7. The code style for IDEA:
> https://maven.apache.org/developers/maven-idea-codestyle.xml
> https://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s401
ill see that the
> classpath contains junit-4.4 instead of the providing one.
> There are several such cases but not all ITs alter the version.
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> ml-node+s40175n5880159...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
Hi surefire devs,
I don't understand how the Junit4VersionsIT sets the JUnit version to use
during testing. The version is set as sysProp "junit.version" on
mavenLauncher, but the test pom.xml in the resources/junit4 folder
uses ${junitVersion} to set the JUnit version. How does this work? Does
ma
Hi maven devs,
which code style file do you use for IntelliJ 2016.2? I've imported the
file from http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-environment.html but
is does not work properly (for example is does not place curly braces on
new lines)
Thank you!
Benedikt
Hello Robert,
you can either create a git diff and attach it as txt file to the jira
issue or you submit a pull request using the GitHub mirror at
https://github.com/apache/maven.
Regards,
Benedikt
Robert Patrick schrieb am Mi., 7. Sep. 2016 um
00:04 Uhr:
> I have fixed for Bug HYPERLINK "
> h
Hello Mikael,
Michael Osipov has asked two times why the change set shows the whole class
as changed. So there has been feedback.
Regards,
Benedikt
Mikael Petterson schrieb am Mi., 7. Sep.
2016 um 08:08 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> Is there no one that can help out with my pull request or is the
> maven-cha
ire 3.0
> which
> > fails because of unresolved transitive dependencies. So this may take
> some
> > time for me.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter [via Maven] <
> > ml-node+s40175n587945...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
Hello Tibor,
Tibor Digana schrieb am Mo., 29. Aug. 2016 um
12:56 Uhr:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> I found out that JUNit 5 was release with ALPHA version in Maven Central.
> I guess there is no need to rush in Surefire yet.
> The JUnit team should contribute in JUnit code line in the artifact
> project o
> > support all the features we had in surefire-junit47. This may always
> > go with bugs and finally more work for you, integration tests, ...
> >
> > On 8/27/16, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> >> Tibor Digana schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug.
> 2016
> >> um
&g
provider is cool, yes please :)
> >
> > Providers have different language levels (the different modules have
> > different language levels), and I am sure we can build with jdk8. jdk8
> > still supports the target 1.6, right ?
> >
> > Kristian
> >
> >
>
Hi,
I'm currently at SoCraTes 2016 [1] and I got a chance to talk to Marc
Philipp [2], who is one of the maintainers of the JUnit project. As you
might know, the JUnit team is currently working on the next major release
of JUnit (JUnit 5 a.k.a Jupiter) [3]. Quite a lot will change in JUnit 5
and M
Hello maven community,
I'm Benedikt Ritter, 30 years old from Neuss (Germany). I'm committer and
member of the project management committee of the Apache Commons project. I
just wanted to introduce myself, since I'd like to contribute to maven
(more on that in a separate mail).
Loo
65 matches
Mail list logo
