Re: Using GIT as the canonical repository for Maven 3.x

2009-04-24 Thread Antony Stubbs
not true! git reset --hard git clean -f git checkout tag will ensure an exact match with the tag/branch. struberg wrote: > > >> Do we really need to do a clean checkout from the tag? > > I'd strongly recommend it! > > The main problems here are files which aren't checked in or ignored but

Re: Using GIT as the canonical repository for Maven 3.x

2009-04-24 Thread Antony Stubbs
There are some fundamental ways in which git works vs Mercurial that make it better - i.e. changesets vs snapshots, multiple branches in 1 repo (in hg last time i looked you have to create a new copy to checkout a different branch) and others... Raphaƫl wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Thinking of dis

Re: Using GIT as the canonical repository for Maven 3.x

2009-04-24 Thread Antony Stubbs
Grok GitX - it's awesomeness for Git's level atm :) http://gitx.frim.nl/seeit.html I've been using it since September, and git since the beginning of last year and it's the nicest gui i've seen yet - mind you i havent' played with idea's stuff yet. Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > +0I never used GI

Re: Quit IBM NZ and work on OSS full time?

2008-06-08 Thread Antony Stubbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is more appropriate for this post. > > On 8-Jun-08, at 5:29 AM, Antony Stubbs wrote: > >> >> Let's say, hypothetically, I to quit my job at IBM NZ and work on a >> couple of >> open source projects full time, Wicket being one of them and Mave

Quit IBM NZ and work on OSS full time?

2008-06-08 Thread Antony Stubbs
Let's say, hypothetically, I to quit my job at IBM NZ and work on a couple of open source projects full time, Wicket being one of them and Maven another, while I travelled around the world... We have a tradition in NZ called and OE - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_experience What do you th