Re: Release maven anton plugin...sorry

2020-04-05 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Sorry for the offtopic, but you probably got attention of a lot of Antons with that subject :) вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 20:16, Elliotte Rusty Harold : > Are there up to date instructions for releasing a Maven plugin > somewhere? If so, I could probably do this. I see > https://maven.apache.org/develo

Re: Second MNG-6296: New option -Dstyle.color is not working

2017-11-18 Thread Anton Tanasenko
I was actually going to ask on the list eventually. Tried using it with -B to no success a few days ago. I've also had no luck finding where this option is documented on the maven site. The only place to look was in the Jira and PR, but those mostly have the syntax that's not actually what was imp

Re: Redesign website

2017-07-21 Thread Anton Tanasenko
What happened to the last attempt and the shotgun owl? :-D On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, 18:22 Robert Scholte, wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to start an attempt to redesign our website. > At ApacheCon Europe Hervé and I got in touch with Open Source Design[1]. > Any objections to contact them and to see if w

Re: index out of bounds 3.5 regression

2017-06-30 Thread Anton Tanasenko
You're hitting an issue [1] in plexus-utils most probably. Check if you have processing instructions in one of the poms. [1] https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-utils/issues/22 2017-06-30 16:57 GMT+03:00 Brian Fox : > I'm getting index out of bounds exceptions with 3.5 that don't occur wi

Re: Maven 3.5.1 - MNG-6025

2017-05-03 Thread Anton Tanasenko
+1 Needed this for a performance fix in m2e. 2017-05-03 15:05 GMT+03:00 Igor Fedorenko : > +1 > > In the longer run I think we need to review the many caches we have in > Maven (including the resolver) and come up with a coherent strategy how > to manage those caches. > > -- > Regards, > Igor >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

2017-03-02 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Hi guys, I've been reminded of another issue that was supposed to go into 3.4.0 at the time but seem to have forgotten about it when the 3.4-3.5 scrubbing thing happened. It's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6025 Really minor thing that doesn't affect maven itself, but could help a lot wh

Re: [IT MNG-5958 - Take 2]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

2017-01-26 Thread Anton Tanasenko
d74c1055dcd0b16d96adc3> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > > > > To clarify: It won't be possible to run the non-updated (tagged?) core > > ITs against Maven >= 3.5.0. This is what made us reset the branches. You > > need to review this, if you are going to run the non-updated ITs against > > what will be voted for release. > > > > @Anton Tanasenko: > > If what I just wrote is incorrect, please comment here. Thank you. > > > > Regards, > > > > Merged to master. > > -- Regards, Anton.

Re: [IT MNG-5958 - Take 2]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

2017-01-19 Thread Anton Tanasenko
New ITs should run successfully against 3.3.9 and 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT+changes. It doesn't make sense to test a feature which is not in. 2017-01-19 22:46 GMT+02:00 Christian Schulte : > Am 01/19/17 um 13:06 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > > Ideal would be to create a *new throw-away branch* that is forked

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

2017-01-15 Thread Anton Tanasenko
I've submitted the PR for MNG-5958 branch. Changed the existing 5805 IT to work for 3.3.9 only ('phases' syntax), and duplicated it to a one that works with 3.3.9+ ('lifecyclePhases' syntax). 2017-01-11 22:59 GMT+02:00 Christian Schulte : > Am 01/11/17 um 15:05 schri

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

2017-01-11 Thread Anton Tanasenko
I'll submit a PR in these couple of days, if it waits a little bit. 2017-01-11 0:54 GMT+02:00 Christian Schulte : > Am 01/10/17 um 09:30 schrieb Anton Tanasenko: > > 3.3.9 (in 5805) introduced an additional syntax for specifying lifecycle > > goals as > > '<..&g

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

2017-01-10 Thread Anton Tanasenko
hange the test (other than > range activation) rather we duplicate the test (second one being _mk2 or > something like that) and ensure that the duplicate has a different range > activation > > HTH > > On 10 January 2017 at 07:32, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno..

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

2017-01-09 Thread Anton Tanasenko
8d3b1416f0cf4f63942dddb171d9> > > > > authorStuart McCulloch > > Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:23:06 +0100 (11:23 +) > > > > Commit to the ITs: > > <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven- > integration-testing.git;a=commit;h=8852538208e508

Re: [DISCUSS] Big Scrub for proposed 3.5.0 (if we reset master)

2016-12-31 Thread Anton Tanasenko
FIX-3.5.0: MNG- WONTFIX Add a ProjectArtifactsCache similar to PluginArtifactsCache That's actually a https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6025 2017-01-01 2:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Osipov : > I just went through the list my issues. Here is a safe list I would > merge/cherry-pick

Re: Massive number of failing ITs

2016-05-19 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Looks like the high failure count was due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6023 The commit that reverted the slf4j version change came in some 9 hours ago while we were running tests just before that. https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/4b35102f0e3302e15a80d3ddb756463601b9217a 2016-

Re: Read plugin configuration from another plugin

2016-04-28 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Hey, M2E is effectively doing LifecycleExecutor#calculateExecutionPlan(session, false, "default").getMojoExecutions(), and each returned mojo execution has a final xml config. 2016-04-28 13:00 GMT+03:00 Tamás Cservenák : > Hi there, > > there is a POC I was toying with after ApacheCon last year

Re: Get licenses of transitive dependencies

2016-04-23 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Hi, MavenProject#getArtifacts() is returning a resolved list of all dependencies, each artifact will have only one specific version. Which scope is resolved - depends on the requiresDependencyResolution attribute of your @Mojo. Be aware, that not all of the projects provide licensing infromation i

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

2015-10-29 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Tried out with a couple of projects that contributed to burning two of the previous release attempts plus a couple more. All good! +1 2015-10-29 23:37 GMT+02:00 jieryn : > Tested with a few projects, I see no issues with this release. Thank you, > +1 non-binding. > On Oct 29, 2015 17:15, "Tamás C

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

2015-08-03 Thread Anton Tanasenko
ink unit tests are of any help in this particular case but do > anything you think will help. > > I’ll cut the release next Monday. > > > On Aug 2, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Anton Tanasenko > wrote: > > > > Sure thing, I'll update pull request. > > Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

2015-08-02 Thread Anton Tanasenko
; Op Sat, 01 Aug 2015 17:05:37 +0200 schreef Anton Tanasenko < > atg.sleepl...@gmail.com>: > > > I've created yet another PR for MNG-5805: >> https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/62 >> Sorry guys, I was certain I had run m-enforcer-p its as well with 3.3.5 >> can

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

2015-08-01 Thread Anton Tanasenko
I've created yet another PR for MNG-5805: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/62 Sorry guys, I was certain I had run m-enforcer-p its as well with 3.3.5 candidate. 2015-08-01 16:57 GMT+03:00 Anton Tanasenko : > Oh not again, > The LifecyclePhase#toString() method was added by me

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

2015-08-01 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Oh not again, The LifecyclePhase#toString() method was added by me along with toLegacyMap. Looks like I didn't take care of 'mojos' field possibly being null. This seems to be happening when an extension specifies a lifecycle phase but doesn't assign any mojo executions to it. 2015-08-01 16:08 GM

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.5

2015-07-23 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Hi Jörg, The error message you posted says that java is unable to allocate 500mb of heap. The machine you were running it on didn't have that much available at the time. 2015-07-23 15:47 GMT+03:00 Jörg Schaible : > Hi folks, > > M335 needs even more memory (see also > http://thread.gmane.org/gma

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

2015-07-19 Thread Anton Tanasenko
I've renamed getter methods in question from xPhases to xLifecyclePhases and reimplemented the original ones to preserve full compatibility. Setters were left mostly as is since imo those are not called from outside of maven core. Pull request is submitted for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

2015-07-19 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Mirko > -- > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ > > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Anton Tanasenko > wrote: > > This looks to be a consequence of MNG -5805 :( > &

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

2015-07-19 Thread Anton Tanasenko
This looks to be a consequence of MNG -5805 :( 2015-07-19 23:12 GMT+03:00 Mirko Friedenhagen : > This seems to affect project which use as an > enforcer-rule. After inserting this rule into another project I get a > similar stack trace. > > --

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

2015-07-18 Thread Anton Tanasenko
+1 for MNG-5805, works perfectly. 2015-07-18 15:33 GMT+03:00 Jason van Zyl : > +1 > > Analyzing release validity... > > stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1199 > groupId: org.apache.maven > artifactId: apache-maven > version: 3.3.4 > > Source ZIP url exists. > >

Custom packaging types: configuring DefaultLifecycleMapping mojo executions

2015-04-19 Thread Anton Tanasenko
Hi, There is no possibility right now to map goals to phases with a custom configuration and/or dependencies when dealing with custom packagin types. DefaultLifecycleMapping only has 'goals' parameter in components.xml, and DefaultLifecyclePluginAnalyzer does not take those into account. I propose