Thanks guys, will do this tonight. Arrghh, mvn install, not deploy, I don't
how I got those confused!
-aps
On Feb 11, 2008 5:56 PM, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> More comments inside...
>
> 2008/2/11, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTE
if you want propose a patch :)
> I guess that the pattern used should also work with -J-version
>
> Vincent
>
> 2008/2/10, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Exactly. The use of "-fullversion" is really for internal use as per
> > Benjamin and typi
Exactly. The use of "-fullversion" is really for internal use as per
Benjamin and typically the format is "java version " or something
of that elk which is very easy to parse. Again, I would rely on the
javadocVersion tag as a backup.
Thanks!
-aps
On Feb 10, 2008 3:22 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EM
e a work-around/better solution, then please do file
> a JIRA bug and attach your patch.
>
> I have no idea why it is using java.vm.version rather than
> java.version, but I'd assume there's a reason. Perhaps your patch
> could read from both, and then pick the best fitting
