lly be such difference in what everyone understand as a release
but an unofficial release on maven central won't be any different than the
latest
sonatype releases on maven central.
Alex
>
> cheers,
> jesse
>
> --
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
>
>
27;t have any obvious legal issues. With my Fedora hat
on I can ensure you that we have identified tons of issues during the Package
review process.
Alexander Kurtakov
>
> So if there is a committer willing to step up and ask to use the newer
> dependency... please do
>
usual complain that Maven downloads the
Internet because for certain artifacats usual "clean install" downloads more
than 5 versions with all of their dependencies. This is certainly a burden for
every IP clearance review.
Alexander Kurtakov
>
> > Benjamin
> >
&
ple doing development.
Alexander Kurtakov
> But that does not validate removing it. It should have bean kept and the
> correct one should have bean deployed with a patch version number (or
> similar).
>
> /Anders
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 16:26, John Casey wrote:
> > O
27;t it make sense to concentrate efforts in favour of the new solution[2]
and letting plexus-maven-plugin rip?
[1] http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-maven-plugin/
[2] http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-containers/plexus-component-metadata/
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
>
> The changes got ap
