I would go for rc4 because we still have API changes after rc3 and our
plugins needs adjustments that could again require another, smaller
changes.
With current state of plugins 4.x they can't be used with latest (master)
version so we could offer only 3.x for Maven 4.
Not so big issue for many use
Sounds like a good plan!
On Wed, 21 May 2025 at 4:12 pm, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Hey Maven Devs,
>
> We're gearing up to release a new version from the master branch. I'm
> thinking we should go for 4.0.0 instead of rc-4. What do you all think? Any
> feedback or ideas on the versioning or relea
Le jeudi 22 mai 2025, 17:30:20 CEST Matthias Bünger a écrit :
> Am 22.05.2025 um 09:23 schrieb Hervé Boutemy:
> > yes to try to make sure Maven 4.0.0 will run smoothly on Java 24
> >
> > on tying Maven 4.0.0 release to Jira to GH Issues migration: is there a
> > strong reason for coupling these 2
Am 22.05.2025 um 09:23 schrieb Hervé Boutemy:
yes to try to make sure Maven 4.0.0 will run smoothly on Java 24
on tying Maven 4.0.0 release to Jira to GH Issues migration: is there a strong
reason for coupling these 2 huge beasts?
Hi Hervè,
TLDR: No strong reason ;)
Long version: Maybe I w
On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 09:24, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> yes to try to make sure Maven 4.0.0 will run smoothly on Java 24
>
> on tying Maven 4.0.0 release to Jira to GH Issues migration: is there a
> strong
> reason for coupling these 2 huge beasts?
>
>
> longer analysis:
>
> Jira to GH Issues migrat
yes to try to make sure Maven 4.0.0 will run smoothly on Java 24
on tying Maven 4.0.0 release to Jira to GH Issues migration: is there a strong
reason for coupling these 2 huge beasts?
longer analysis:
Jira to GH Issues migration has started everywhere (66 as of now, if tracking
is accurate [
Le jeudi 22 mai 2025, 08:49:20 CEST Mark Derricutt a écrit :
> On 22 May 2025 at 6:19:26 PM, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> > I don't get what plugin updates are expected: are there Maven 3 plugins
> > known
> > to fail on Maven 4? If yes, are they so many?
>
> That I’m not sure - since we can’t run our
On 2025/05/21 09:05:07 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have several significant features waiting as PRs (mixins and
> cascading profiles), but I’ve decided to postpone them until 4.1.0.
> For what it’s worth, several people, including the IntelliJ team, have
> expressed concerns about 4.0.0
