In this case better to keep different commits for each different issues
(just in case some need to be reverted)
On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 9:45 pm, Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> Yes, just squash and merge. One approval is all you need.
>
> We use version control so in a worst case scenario we can al
Yes, just squash and merge. One approval is all you need.
We use version control so in a worst case scenario we can always roll
back or revert. More likely if something's wrong we just fix it in a
new PR. Merging is not an irreparable commitment, but 99 times out of
100 we just merge and continue
Hi,
My 2 cents would be that in java ecosystem you just do not care and you
will find 33% of people liking vN format, 33% N format and 33%
$project-$version or variants ($project/$version for ex).
I tend to think, until you have some major tooling not supporting the
convention (which is not our ca
Maybe some side-angle from a fellow Apache project
In PLC4X we build all of our variants with maven ... also PLC4Go.
When releasing we changed tagging of releases to use the „v-notation“ as this
allows simpler integration into the Go dependency resolution.
However I would not say that this use-c
-1
Changing such an important requirement in the RC phase isn't professional.
On 2025/04/30 13:12:43 Matthias Bünger wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> over the last years we had several discussions about lifting the
> required Java version to run Maven from 8 to something higher. You can
> find them in t
+1 (non-binding)
Enrico
Il giorno ven 2 mag 2025 alle ore 09:41 Niels Basjes ha
scritto:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 8:27 AM Piotr P. Karwasz >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 30.04.2025 15:12, Matthias Bünger wrote:
> > > In a chat with several PMC, committers and contributors
-1
The 'v' is absolutely redundant since it does repeat on every object.
See also: https://github.com/apache/maven-release/pull/122
On 2025/05/01 20:30:02 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We introduce a short and the same template release tag name for Maven
> projects as:
>
> v@{project.ve
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 8:27 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30.04.2025 15:12, Matthias Bünger wrote:
> > In a chat with several PMC, committers and contributors nobody saw
> > strong disadvantages on this. Therefore, I want to start the official
> > vote to set the minim
