Another point to consider is that the new inference mechanism mostly
fulfills the need to import your own BOM.
Guillaume Nodet
Le sam. 25 janv. 2025 à 02:11, Tamás Cservenák a
écrit :
> Howdy,
>
> The story of BOM POMs is manifold.
> BOM POMs are a "very good thing" t
Howdy, just a short pointer to published BOMs:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/4.0.0-rc-2/
Here you can inspect generated "fat" and "skinny" BOMs Maven4 build produces.
T
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 2:10 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> The story of BOM PO
Howdy,
The story of BOM POMs is manifold.
BOM POMs are a "very good thing" to publish for _downstream consumers_
that consume your stack.
Problems begin when devs try to "reuse" the BOM within their own build
(same reactor BOM is published from).
If consuming BOM, it should ideally come from outs
Hi,
Nice presentation.
I have been asking on slack but no answer, so I still don't understand why this
" Warning: Same-reactor BOMs will be deprecated (use external BOMs only!` ?"
It's very convenient for large projects providing boms to have
demos/examples as part of their build.
And obviously, t
Nice design of the output!
Have you tested the extension in an CI environment? That might be useful,
especially combined with mvnd or mvn -T...
- Ben
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025, 16:25 Adrian Tarau, wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm building a Maven extension to change the behavior of Maven while
> bui
Maybe it would be good to prefix all branches the the github names of
owners.. at least it is easier to find the person then to figure out
next steps..
For existing branches.. maybe check who the last committer was..
Manfred
On 2025-01-24 4:37 a.m., Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
Just trying t
On 24/01/2025 13:47, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 à 11:25, Mark Raynsford <
>> Are there details somewhere on the dependency "inference"?
>>
>
> This goes back to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6656
> To summarize (and it has changed since the original commit), if your
Give "gh" a try, it really helps dealing with github repos and PRs.
Checking out a PR is "gh pr checkout 2060", no need to add a remote repo or
whatever...
Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 à 14:54, Elliotte Rusty Harold a
écrit :
> Perhaps. I use git.
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:47 PM Guillaume Nodet wr
Perhaps. I use git.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 1:47 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 à 11:25, Mark Raynsford <
> org.apache.maven.u...@io7m.com> a écrit :
>
> > On 22/01/2025 15:25, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > > Lately, we get this question quite often.
> > >
> >
Le ven. 24 janv. 2025 à 11:25, Mark Raynsford <
org.apache.maven.u...@io7m.com> a écrit :
> On 22/01/2025 15:25, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Lately, we get this question quite often.
> >
> > Today Guillaume assembled this very informative presentation:
> > https://gnodet.github.io/ma
Maybe you're using the wrong tools ?
Here's my workflow:
* create a branch locally
* commit the modifications to your local branch
* go to terminal and run `gh pr create`, give the few informations needed,
and done
The first time, it will ask which repo you want to use to create PR, it
even pro
for example I suffers from having 4 organizations holding
forks,smokes,shades，demos...
and I also have another one or two organizations for several relative repos
that shall be in a repo group
Xeno Amess
From: Xeno Amess
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 9:05:40 PM
not Elli's fault，github is somehow broken at repo manage system...
There SHALL have ability to make repo group，and in each group allow same-name
repos...like what gitlab did.
but now we can only use multi account， or lots of
one-man-organization...just，foolish github
Xeno Amess
Xeno Amess
_
not Elli's fault，github is somehow broken at repo manage system...
There SHALL have anility to make repo group，and in each group allow damr-name
repost...like what gitlab did.
but now we can only use?multi account， or lots of
one-man-organization...just，foolish github
Xeno Amess
I really wonder what will some new Elliotte in near or far future say
about branches named "utils", "unused", "mdo", "apidoc" and "qube"
say...
At _least_ use MNG- name to have some link to the issue.
This, what you do now, makes the canonical repo look as your own
private sandbox.
https://git
Oh Gary sometimes you are just too mean
(btw I strongly suggest fork.)
发件人: Gary Gregory
发送时间: 星期五, 一月 24, 2025 8:45:22 下午
收件人: Maven Developers List
主题: Re: maven-3.x-next
Thank for bringing a smile to my face this morning.
Gary
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 07:28 T
Thank for bringing a smile to my face this morning.
Gary
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 07:28 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> So let me get this straight: you are now suffering from
> "unknown branches and/or junkyard of branches in canonical repo"?
> While you still refuse to use forks?
>
> T
>
Thanks.
Meanwhile, I will post in the user mailing list, get more early feedback
from the community.
On 1/24/2025 7:35 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
Howdy,
This sounds great. Will take a peek once we are out with 4 rc3.
Thanks for your patience and contribution!
T
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 4:2
Just trying to do a little cleanup.
And no, I'm not going to use forks. I tried that again, and they still
add multiple extra steps compared to using branches. We've got enough
work to do not to waste time on less efficient tools and processes.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tamás Cservenák w
Howdy,
This sounds great. Will take a peek once we are out with 4 rc3.
Thanks for your patience and contribution!
T
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 4:25 PM Adrian Tarau wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm building a Maven extension to change the behavior of Maven while
> building, to scratch an itch h
Howdy,
So let me get this straight: you are now suffering from
"unknown branches and/or junkyard of branches in canonical repo"?
While you still refuse to use forks?
T
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
>
> Can I delete the maven-3.x-next branch in the github repo
Can I delete the maven-3.x-next branch in the github repo? It appears
to be a relic of circa 3.5.0 and is not the actual current 3.x branch,
which I'm still looking for.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elh...@ibiblio.org
-
To unsubscri
On 22/01/2025 15:25, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Lately, we get this question quite often.
>
> Today Guillaume assembled this very informative presentation:
> https://gnodet.github.io/maven4-presentation/
>
> There is also ongoing effort to assemble a page on Maven site as well:
> https:
23 matches
Mail list logo
