Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Archiver version 4.0.0-beta-3

+1 pon., 2 gru 2024, 08:52 użytkownik Slawomir Jaranowski < s.jaranow...@gmail.com> napisał: > +1 > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 at 18:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The beta-2 release was cancelled because of having changed the groupId > > without renaming the package. > > > > This rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Archiver version 4.0.0-beta-3

+1 On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 at 18:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Hi, > > The beta-2 release was cancelled because of having changed the groupId > without renaming the package. > > This release mainly updates to Maven 4.0.0-beta-5 (the API is compatible > with rc-1) and changes the main package and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Archiver version 4.0.0-beta-3

+1 On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 at 03:16, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Hi, > > The beta-2 release was cancelled because of having changed the groupId > without renaming the package. > > This release mainly updates to Maven 4.0.0-beta-5 (the API is compatible > with rc-1) and changes the main package and the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Archiver version 4.0.0-beta-3

+1 On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 6:16 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Hi, > > The beta-2 release was cancelled because of having changed the groupId > without renaming the package. > > This release mainly updates to Maven 4.0.0-beta-5 (the API is compatible > with rc-1) and changes the main package and th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Archiver version 4.0.0-beta-3

+1 Le mer. 27 nov. 2024 à 18:13, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Hi, > > The beta-2 release was cancelled because of having changed the groupId > without renaming the package. > > This release mainly updates to Maven 4.0.0-beta-5 (the API is compatible > with rc-1) and changes the main package and t

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Daemon 2.0.0-rc-1

Closing this vote with 7 +1s and no other votes. I'll publish this release asap. Guillaume Le mar. 26 nov. 2024 à 11:07, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Hey, > > Note: mvnd 1.x wraps Maven 3.9.x and 2.x wraps Maven 4.x. > > This release provides distributions based on Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-1. > Not

Re: autorun spotless

It looks Romain was referring to failing early or late because of spotless (bind the check goal to validate or verify phase) Perso, I prefer to fail early (check at validate phase) because I find it frustrating to run some 10 minutes build (because -Prun-its) and then fail after so long because of

Re: autorun spotless

Currently, the build will fail both locally and on CI if your sources are not formatted properly. The proposal is to change local builds to auto-format and keep CI to a a check. So it cannot slow your dev workflow, quite the opposite, as instead of failing your build locally, the sources will be a

Re: autorun spotless

Not sure it is that important since at the end it will fail but from my experience, bypassing it during the dev (ie being bound late) is nicer cause you iterate faster. That said we can PR to make it "failAtEnd", would be good anyway Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | B

Re: autorun spotless

+1 to make it part of the Maven build, either in validate or in verify phase. I usually do this in work projects, too. As Eliotte says, it avoids breaking the build in CI. Preferably enabled by default, also on local builds. The only thing where I doubt is whether validate or verify would be