Hi,
We solved 12 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322&version=12354471&styleName=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2218
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-2218/org/apache/maven/plugins/mav
Thanks for that. Our artifactory release predates 7.68 so this could well
be the culprit.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 7:16 AM Richard Eckart de Castilho
wrote:
> Hi
>
> > On 14. Oct 2024, at 01:31, Dale Ogilvie
> wrote:
> >
> > The trick is, the generated maven-metadata.xml is fine when we use mave
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/14 20:48:19 Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This Resolver 2.0.2 release is a bugfix release with several
> improvements as well.
>
> Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains a
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2024/10/12 19:48:50 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 69 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12354042
>
> There are still a couple of issues l
Howdy,
This Resolver 2.0.2 release is a bugfix release with several
improvements as well.
Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains at
Resolver 1.x lineage. The two major versions, as far as client code
goes (Mojos or extensions, using Resolver API as documented), are
binary c
Hi
> On 14. Oct 2024, at 01:31, Dale Ogilvie wrote:
>
> The trick is, the generated maven-metadata.xml is fine when we use maven
> 3.8.5. This is a very mature build pipeline, and we have just started
> noticing this, after a switch to 3.9.x
>
> I'm taking a look at this off of our build infras
The only remaining task is to update deps and do the actual releases. See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Towards+Doxia+2.0.0+Stack#TowardsDoxia2.0.0Stack-ComponentReleaseOrder
Expect the trail to be complete end of October.
On 2024/10/13 12:45:38 Claude Warren wrote:
> May i a