Elliotte,
as per guidelines, it is not required. And I did not put it that way in my
email.
However, a reason would have helped in finding alternatives.
Anyway, here's my +1.
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, 19:14 Elliotte Rusty Harold, wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:31 AM Benjamin Marwell
> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 2:31 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Please refrain from starting discussions in this thread, but do
> include a reasoning on downvotes and feel free to start a new
> discussion on the mailing list, or comment on the existing ones.
-1
Requiring reasons for downvotes but not
+1 (non binding)
The preceding discussion was quite insightful and informative.
--
Ceki Gülcü
Sponsoring SLF4J/logback/reload4j at https://github.com/sponsors/qos-ch
On 2/28/2024 8:30 AM, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members!
>
> After several discussions
