Am 2024-01-09 um 09:12 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 20:49 Slawomir Jaranowski
napisał(a):
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 16:17 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
On 2024/01/05 14:03:11 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
Hi,
My summary for this discussion:
No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák,
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Reporting API version 4.0.0-M10.
https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-reporting-api/
Release Notes - Maven Shared Components - Version
maven-reporting-api-4.0.0-M10
** Task
* [MSHARED-1326] - Improve (documentation o
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Plugin Tools, version 3.11.0.
https://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools/
Release Notes - Maven Plugin Tools - Version 3.11.0
** Bug
* [MPLUGIN-496] - Translation for keys report.plugin.goal.yes,no
are missing
*
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1: Sylwester Lachiewicz, Herve Boutemy, Tamás Cservenák, Karl Heinz
Marbaise
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP
file and add this release the board report.
---
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1: Elliotte Rusty Harold, Michael Osipov, Slawomir Jaranowski, Hervé
Boutemy, Tamás Cservenák, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Karl Heinz Marbaise
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP
file
and
śr., 10 sty 2024 o 13:58 Romain Manni-Bucau
napisał(a):
> Hi Elliotte,
>
> think it was a no luck phenomenon (probably due to the load the matrix put
> on github OSS runners/infra).
> That said there is a misconfiguration in the GH Actions yaml about version
> 21 but this one is less misterious:
The first thing I do when I see issues like this is check
www.githubstatus.com
Gary
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024, 7:31 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> If anyone has a minute to take a look. I see various failures on
> different dependabot PRs that have nothing to do with their content.
> E.g.
>
> Er
IMO, add all. I think is fine, but PR discussion will decide anyway...
T
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:56 PM Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> wrote:
> Le 2024-01-10 à 14 h 45, Tamás Cservenák a écrit :
> >
> > I really like what I see here. Can you make a PR out of it?
> >
>
Le 2024-01-10 à 14 h 45, Tamás Cservenák a écrit :
I really like what I see here. Can you make a PR out of it?
Sure, I can create the PR and the JIRA tasks in the next few days. Do we
exclude (for now) the last commit, if the type names need discussion?
I will also need to add test cases bef
I see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7855 but it is a bug.
I'd rather create one "improvement" or "new feat" even, and work under that
one, and later we can collect all related bugs under this one...
T
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:45 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I really lik
Martin,
I really like what I see here. Can you make a PR out of it?
Do you have a JIRA to assign PR to or should I create one? (or you can
register for a JIRA account if you want...).
Thanks
T
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 6:16 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Design looks better for me
Hi Elliotte,
think it was a no luck phenomenon (probably due to the load the matrix put
on github OSS runners/infra).
That said there is a misconfiguration in the GH Actions yaml about version
21 but this one is less misterious:
Error: Could not find satisfied version for SemVer '21'.
Best,
Roma
If anyone has a minute to take a look. I see various failures on
different dependabot PRs that have nothing to do with their content.
E.g.
Error: Internal server error occurred while resolving
"actions/checkout@v4". Internal server error occurred while resolving
"actions/setup-java@v4". Internal s
13 matches
Mail list logo
