+1
niedz., 1 paź 2023, 21:47 użytkownik Tamás Cservenák
napisał:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 20:19 Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M12 vote/staging repo!
> >
> > we solved 3 issues:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.j
+1
niedz., 1 paź 2023, 21:47 użytkownik Tamás Cservenák
napisał:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 20:03 Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > we solved 5 issues:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353413
> >
> > There are still a couple
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Sylwester Lachiewicz, Tamás Cservenák, Michael Osipov, Hervé Boutemy
PMC quorum reached
I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the
artifacts to the central repo.
-
was intended to the list :)
-- Message transmis --
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Artifact Plugin version 3.5.0
Date : samedi 30 septembre 2023, 18:45:51 CEST
De : Michael Osipov
À : Hervé Boutemy
Am 2023-09-29 um 08:00 schrieb Hervé Boutemy:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 i
+1 (works on tested projects and aligned with discussions)
Le lun. 2 oct. 2023 à 00:32, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Understood and thank you for the clarification. Seeing the original in a
> VOTE thread gave it top much attention IMO.
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 4:13 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote
Understood and thank you for the clarification. Seeing the original in a
VOTE thread gave it top much attention IMO.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 4:13 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Yes, I agree.
>
> To rephrase, i meant more like "our focus should be Maven4", meaning, that
> IMHO we shoul
Howdy,
Yes, I agree.
To rephrase, i meant more like "our focus should be Maven4", meaning, that
IMHO we should not push new features into 3 anymore (similarly in resolver,
all the new features like HTTP/2 are "parked" for resolver 2 [to be used
with Maven 4]). I did not say "no more 3.x releases"
>From the peanut gallery, it feels odd to call anything 3.x in maintenance
mode when there is not a 4.0.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 3:08 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Note: This release completes the main goals of Maven 3.9.x lineage, among
> others moving to Java 8 and transition to la
+1
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 20:19 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M12 vote/staging repo!
>
> we solved 3 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353492
>
> There are no issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://
+1
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023, 20:03 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 5 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353413
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20123
Am 2023-10-01 um 21:07 schrieb Tamás Cservenák:
Howdy,
Note: This release completes the main goals of Maven 3.9.x lineage, among
others moving to Java 8 and transition to latest Resolver 1.9.x features
(new robust transports, local repository locking, provided checksums,
remote repository filter
Howdy,
Note: This release completes the main goals of Maven 3.9.x lineage, among
others moving to Java 8 and transition to latest Resolver 1.9.x features
(new robust transports, local repository locking, provided checksums,
remote repository filtering and more). Maven Resolver 1.9.x lineage is
alr
Hi,
IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M12 vote/staging repo!
we solved 3 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12353492
There are no issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MSHARED%20AND%20resolu
Hi,
we solved 5 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12353413
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317320%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open
Staging repo:
https://repository.ap
1. I suspect dependabot doesn't work with this. Does it? Is this worth
giving up dependabot for?
2. What's the threat model? As best I can make out, someone would have
to compromise the dependencies in the local .m2/repo since anything
downloaded comes over https and is already signature checked.
15 matches
Mail list logo