Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 2.0.0-M4

2022-11-27 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
+1 sob., 26 lis 2022, 16:52 użytkownik Michael Osipov napisał: > Hi, > > we solved 10 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12352134 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 2.0.0-M4

2022-11-27 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 at 01:52, Michael Osipov wrote: > > Hi, > > we solved 10 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12352134 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012

Re: Using Transporter from Maven Resolver

2022-11-27 Thread Andrzej
Thanks for the quick answer. Andrzej From: Tam?s Cserven?k Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2022 6:17:31 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Using Transporter from Maven Resolver Howdy, short answer: for plugins, no, the Resolver Transporter is NOT a public AP

Re: [DISCUSS] Quo Vadis Maven Site

2022-11-27 Thread Hervé Boutemy
great news: I just created a proof of concept where reporting can output markup instead of a html site please review https://github.com/apache/maven-reporting-impl/pull/13 the added IT shows the feature tested by running report as a direct goal invocation, with output format as xdoc or apt as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 2.0.0-M4

2022-11-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 4:52 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > we solved 10 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12352134 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Dependency Plugin version 3.4.0

2022-11-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:40 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 21 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317227&version=12351068 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MDEP/issues > > S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 2.0.0-M4

2022-11-27 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2022-11-26 um 16:52 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, we solved 10 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320&version=12352134 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317320%20AND%20status%

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Dependency Plugin version 3.4.0

2022-11-27 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2022-11-26 um 22:40 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, We solved 21 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317227&version=12351068 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MDEP/issues Staging repo: https://reposito

Re: Using Transporter from Maven Resolver

2022-11-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, short answer: for plugins, no, the Resolver Transporter is NOT a public API. HTH T On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 1:14 PM A.J. Jarmoniuk wrote: > Howdy, > > I'd like to replace WagonManager from maven-compat in Versions Maven Plugin > with a Transporter from Maven Resolver/aether. Question is

Fwd: Using Transporter from Maven Resolver

2022-11-27 Thread A.J. Jarmoniuk
Hello, I'd like to replace WagonManager from maven-compat in Versions Maven Plugin with a Transporter from Maven Resolver/aether. Question is -- is Transporter and TransporterFactory public API? Or, as it's SPI, so I guess it's probably for Resolver's internal consumption. Looking forward for an

Using Transporter from Maven Resolver

2022-11-27 Thread A.J. Jarmoniuk
Howdy, I'd like to replace WagonManager from maven-compat in Versions Maven Plugin with a Transporter from Maven Resolver/aether. Question is -- is Transporter and TransporterFactory public API? Or, as it's SPI, so I guess it's probably for Resolver's internal consumption. Looking forward for an