Re: [VOTE] Release Maven SCM version 2.0.0-M3

2022-10-27 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
+1 wt., 25 paź 2022 o 21:58 Michael Osipov napisał(a): > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828&version=12352129 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SCM/issues > > Stagin

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven SCM version 2.0.0-M3

2022-10-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:58 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828&version=12352129 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SCM/issues > > Stag

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven SCM version 2.0.0-M3

2022-10-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1 (non binding) The source distribution builds fine with mvnd+maven-4.0.0-alpha2. Le mar. 25 oct. 2022 à 21:58, Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 2 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828&version=12352129 > > There are still a couple of

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven SCM version 2.0.0-M3

2022-10-27 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2022-10-25 um 21:58 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, We solved 2 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828&version=12352129 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SCM/issues Staging repo: https://repository

Re: Artifact Resolver configuration

2022-10-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Yup, there a LOT of new stuff coming with 1.9, but yes, split repo is among "interesting" ones: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/blob/master/src/site/markdown/configuration.md RRF (aether.remoteRepositoryFilter.*) and documented here: https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/blob/master/s

Re: Artifact Resolver configuration

2022-10-27 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi, Agree to not expose all LOW LEVEL configurations. So we can think - what is LOW and HIGH level - "most common" - how to map LOW to HIGH I see that maven.resolver.transport and maven.resolver.locking can be as HIGH level And the question is still open - how users can manage HIGH level opt

Re: Artifact Resolver configuration

2022-10-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, I already thought about this, and probably shared some thoughts (that may have slipped, or did not share on ML?). In short: personally, I consider these "resolver configurations" LOW LEVEL settings that ARE exposed to those users who are adventurous, but in general, Maven should provide sa

Artifact Resolver configuration

2022-10-27 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi, Artifact Resolver has many useful configuration options [1] Most of these properties must be provided by user or system properties. Some are extracted from settings.xml Providing such many settings by command line for every execution is very uncomfortable. We can put those in MAVEN_OPTS by

[VOTE] Maven Build Cache Extension 1.0.0

2022-10-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Hi, I've staged a release of Maven Build Cache Extension 1.0.0. This is the first release of this component. Solved issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324820&version=12351243 JIRA issues left: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MBUILDCACHE?jql=project

[SUCCESS] [VOTE] Maven Apache Shade Plugin 3.4.1

2022-10-27 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Closing this vote with the following votes: +1: @rmannibucau, sjaranowski , olamy, hboutemy +1 non binding: gnodet No other votes. I'll publish the release. Le ven. 21 oct. 2022 à 22:59, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 7 is