Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Maven Surefire 3.0.0-M7

2022-06-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 16:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Well, I already wrote it on multiple threads but let try to refine that: > > 1. (Side note) we can need another thread ;) > 2. Surefire 3 is stable and reasons to hold a final release are internal > and not user facing so we can do a final

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Maven Surefire 3.0.0-M7

2022-06-08 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Well, I already wrote it on multiple threads but let try to refine that: 1. (Side note) we can need another thread ;) 2. Surefire 3 is stable and reasons to hold a final release are internal and not user facing so we can do a final 3. JPMS is *not* supported for the reason you mentionned 4. We nev

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Maven Surefire 3.0.0-M7

2022-06-08 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 04:29, David Karr wrote: > Now that M7 is released, I have a feeling I know the answer to this, but > what are your thoughts about when a full release will go out with these > latest changes? I'm currently evaluating whether we can upgrade our > internal platform to support

Re: [MPH-183] effective-pom + verbose should show path to source

2022-06-08 Thread Robert Scholte
This is already a huge improvement as imported boms now hides this information. I do see room for more improvements, though (even though they could be considering as minor as this already solves a critical issue) From another example I picked one of the longest lines: 2.16.1 Suppose you

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Release version 3.0.0-M6

2022-06-08 Thread herve . boutemy
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Michael Osipov, Samuel Le Berrigaud, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Olivier Lamy, Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Slawomir Jaranowski PMC quorum: reached I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the artifacts