I could not agree more. It is extremely important for users to understand that
we
are NOT a commercial entity providing support. And contrary to other open source
products there is large, well known commercial entity either.
I also second all the other points from Tamas.
Manfred
Tamás Cservená
I fully agree, but all of this must be clearly defined on the web page.
Right now https://maven.apache.org/docs/history.html is not clear
about what is and what is not "maintained", and also many plugins
still "target" Maven 3.1.1 or 3.2.5, hopefully this proposal along
with the "Radical Fast Forw
Errata below:
So, if for some business reason you are forced to use any pre Java 8 for
> development, you have two options:
> - use the latest Maven and toolchains targeting old Java
> - use the same versions of tools that are from the era when that Java was
> latest. Accept that with non-evolved
I've raised a PR with the new immutable model at [1]. The new API would
only use the immutable model, while the old API would use the old model
rewritten to wrap the immutable model.
There are no real changes in the tests or integration tests (apart from 1
removed test), so this is really fully co
Howdy,
Personally, I'd NOT use the term "supported" at all, as it comes from the
commercial realm (at least for me it sounds like it).
We do not support anything :)
I'd use the word "maintained" instead. So, according to that:
maven 3.8.x is "maintained ONLY for critical regressions"
maven 3.9.x
Honestly, the first thing to clarify is, what it means supported/EOL
in Maven terms?. There is a lot of confusion of what it's supported
since it's expected that newer versions of Maven should be
"backward-compatible" with previous versions of Maven.
If I have a project that was "initially" design
you're focusing on Maven core only
I'm talking about Maven = core + plugins
and on Maven core, 3.9 and master are for new features, 3.8 is a stabilisation
branch only (bugfixes) = the intent of initial message from Tamas
older releases are stable: yes, we don't expect fixes because they are
con
Am 2022-04-10 um 19:59 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
Le dimanche 10 avril 2022, 09:56:46 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit :
Am 2022-04-10 um 09:10 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
I think that the truth is that versions less than 3.8.x are also EOL.
no
please read the EOL message we took a lot of discussion to de