Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.5.0

+1 On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 19:46 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 5 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12351097 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WA

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

I've tried to use git filter-repo, excluding unwanted directories or extensions here is a sample result: https://github.com/hboutemy/maven-build-cache-extension-filtered = 4200 commits instead of initial 11700 https://github.com/hboutemy/maven-build-cache-extension we can still improve the list

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.7.3

Am 2021-12-19 um 20:31 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12350595 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MRESOLVER%20AND%20reso

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.5.0

Am 2021-12-19 um 19:46 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, We solved 5 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12351097 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WAGON%20AND%20resoluti

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.5.0

+1 niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 21:48 Enrico Olivelli napisał(a): > > +1 (non binding) > > > Enrico > > Il Dom 19 Dic 2021, 19:46 Michael Osipov ha scritto: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 5 issues: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12351097 > > > > T

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.7.3

+1 On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 20:32 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12350595 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MR

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.5.0

+1 (non binding) Enrico Il Dom 19 Dic 2021, 19:46 Michael Osipov ha scritto: > Hi, > > We solved 5 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12351097 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issu

[VOTE] Release Maven Resolver version 1.7.3

Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12350595 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MRESOLVER%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%2

Re: Surefire next release

In my opinion onmy M9 would be worth it but I don't think users care too so we should go with 3.0.0, do other Mx in 3.0.x and if we want to tackle M9 items do a 3.1.0 (but not sure it bothers that much to be honest, it is more about being "clean" than anything else IMHO). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmann

Re: Surefire next release

And what with the road map ... https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:32 Slawomir Jaranowski napisał(a): > For Maven Api at the moment I think only change requirements and > dependency ... without using new features - We are not sure if it

[VOTE] Release Maven Wagon version 3.5.0

Hi, We solved 5 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122&version=12351097 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20WAGON%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved Staging repo: https://reposi

Re: Surefire next release

For Maven Api at the moment I think only change requirements and dependency ... without using new features - We are not sure if it works with earlier versions anyway - minimal Maven on jenkins is 3.2.5 JDK 8 - also only target change - will open possibility to refactor in the feature But we needed

Re: Surefire next release

Don't think both are important to release, we can mention we only target j8 without doing the change I think, this one is more than ok now. About JSR330 I think we are better staying away from it due to the related threads but it is internals anyway so not a big deal for surefire IMHO. Releasing t

Re: Surefire next release

What do you think about: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1959 - even 3.2.5 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1955 ... yes i know not all like it, but when ... if we think about 3.0.0 version it be ok i think before release ... niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:02 Romain Manni-

Re: Surefire next release

AFAIK there was no real change since "Cutting a release for Surefire?" from april where work was not production ready. That said I'm happy to get a 3.0.0 and maybe a 3.1.0 later since we abandonned 2 officially and 3 looks quite stable enough. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: Surefire next release

At work, some of my colleagues balk at seeing milestone versions in our builds. What is preventing the next version from being "3.0.0", no "M". I thought I read here a while back that the code was production ready. Gary On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 12:26 Olivier Lamy wrote: > Sounds good. > I'd really

Re: Surefire next release

Sounds good. I'd really like to review/include this PR as well https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/400 I hope to finish the review for this one during the week. On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 at 18:22, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi > > Last time I did the surefire build more stable. > > Now bui

Re: Using of Travis

Hello, I'm not an active contributor but here are some observations: 1. travis vs github scripts can differ even in one repository (e.g. [1] and [2]) 2. Travis badge can be misleading as it usually shows a failing badge. :) 3. Travis is spread across Apache projects [3], unfortunately I didn't fi