Hi Tamas,
this is great news! I agree with you that most protocols are either
file:// (project-relative repositories) or https:// based nowadays.
Thanks!
Am Mi., 15. Dez. 2021 um 14:44 Uhr schrieb Guillaume Nodet :
>
> Such a massive performance improvement is really nice ! I don't know the
> wh
+1
Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 19:38, Jason van zyl a écrit :
> +1
>
> jvz
>
> > On Dec 13, 2021, at 4:09 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 18 issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12323721&version=12350068&styleName=Text
> >
> > Stagi
+1
jvz
> On Dec 13, 2021, at 4:09 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 18 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12323721&version=12350068&styleName=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1679/
> https:/
Such a massive performance improvement is really nice ! I don't know the
whole history behind wagon and other transports so I don't have a strong
opinion about the location of such an improvement , but I definitely
welcome it !
Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 09:26, Tamás Cservenák a
écrit :
> Howdy,
>
>
Both of those (#622 and #630) look like important changes to merge.
Getting the caching extension used and those interfaces exercised by the
community is only a good thing.
Given there’s only one extension in that area right now, even if the extension
point interfaces had to change to accommod
Simple test (someone could repeat/verify): build maven with reference build
(master) and transport-http w/ smart checksums for central build, focusing
on "transfer time" (so always empty local repo).
(my) prerequisites:
Java11 temurin, Linux, maven 3.8.4
a) build maven master locally (I
used 16dd
+1
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:09 PM Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 18 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12323721&version=12350068&styleName=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1679/
>
> https://rep
Howdy,
I'd like to pitch a topic about maven-resolver and usage of Wagon in it.
As IMHO, Wagon use in maven-resolver is far from optimal (is very
suboptimal).
Typical example is this PR:
https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/140
This PR _halves HTTP requests made by resolver_ against Mav
