Am 2021-09-08 um 22:27 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Hi,
We solved 13 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12344271
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MRESOLVER%20AND%20res
Hi Emond and Tibor,
I’m glad you discovered the new LauncherSession API which was added for this
purpose. The JUnit 5.8 GA release will come in the next few days.
As you mentrioned, the official documentation does not (yet!) do a good job of
explaining its intended use case:
https://junit.org/j
Hi Emond,
This section of code is executed for the forkCount > 1
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/master/surefire-providers/surefire-junit-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/junitplatform/JUnitPlatformProvider.java#L194-L202
The above part runs if the forkCount is 1.
Do
Hi Tibor,
That's what I implemented, although I couldn't use the fancy try, because
of the way the code is structured. The LauncherSession is started by
LazyLauncher. This will allow registering a listener for opening and
closing the session, given a place for pre and post fixtures.
Best regards,
Hi Emond,
Are you looking for this?
https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/blob/main/documentation/src/test/java/example/UsingTheLauncherDemo.java#L86-L96
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:49 PM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:15 PM Emond Papegaaij >
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 20
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:15 PM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:41 PM Christian Stein
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:27 PM Emond Papegaaij <
>> emond.papega...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> For now, I think the LauncherSession is the best way to at least provide
>> > som
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:41 PM Christian Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:27 PM Emond Papegaaij >
> wrote:
>
> For now, I think the LauncherSession is the best way to at least provide
> > some hooks for pre and post fixtures. It shouldn't be too hard to get
> this
> > in the current cod
Sorry for typos, I sent it from my mobile.
T
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> We have to dig into Junit 5. Surefire is a streamer of classes across the
> forks which is our load balancer. Therefore each class is running
> separately, pre and post fixtures. If the Junit 5 use
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:27 PM Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> [...]
For now, I think the LauncherSession is the best way to at least provide
> some hooks for pre and post fixtures. It shouldn't be too hard to get this
> in the current code base with backwards compatibility for JUnit Platform
> 1.7 an
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:18 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> We have to dig into Junit 5. Surefire is a streamer of classes across the
> forks which is our load balancer. Therefore each class is running
> separately, pre and post fixtures. If the Junit 5 used Java Streamer
> including dome kind of contr
michael-o commented on pull request #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/257#issuecomment-917065645
@waldyrious Muito obrigado!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
michael-o merged pull request #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/257
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
waldyrious commented on pull request #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/257#issuecomment-917045041
Ok, updated with the changes discussed above.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
We have to dig into Junit 5. Surefire is a streamer of classes across the
forks which is our load balancer. Therefore each class is running
separately, pre and post fixtures. If the Junit 5 used Java Streamer
including dome kind of control of fixtures then web would have this issue.
Dňa pi 10. 9.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:06 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> If you use forkCount > 1, the Surefire loads test classes via load
> balancer.
> If you use default forkCount = 0, all the classes are run eagerly as a
> suite via JUnit5 Launcher in one shot.
>
Yes, this is what I saw in the JUnitPlatformPro
michael-o merged pull request #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/258
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
michael-o commented on pull request #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/257#issuecomment-917007266
>
>
> Well, in [Introduction to the Build Lifecycle § Usual Command Line
Calls](http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html#usual-co
Please read the documentation
https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:05 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> If you use forkCount > 1, the Surefire loads test classes via load
> balancer.
> If you use default forkCount = 0, all the classes a
If you use forkCount > 1, the Surefire loads test classes via load balancer.
If you use default forkCount = 0, all the classes are run eagerly as a
suite via JUnit5 Launcher in one shot.
If you are aiming for Arquillian, testing the applications in the
application server, you should use maven-fail
waldyrious commented on pull request #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/257#issuecomment-916928861
Well, in [Introduction to the Build Lifecycle § Usual Command Line
Calls](http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html#usual-command-line-ca
marcphilipp commented on pull request #258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/258#issuecomment-916914831
After a discussion on Slack, I created a subsection for commercial
extensions.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven
PMD Plugin, version 3.15.0
A Maven plugin for the PMD toolkit, that produces a report on both code
rule violations and detected copy and paste
fragments, as well as being able to fail the build based on these metrics.
https
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Olivier Lamy, Tamás Cservenák, Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy,
Arnaud Héritier,
Sylwester Lachiewicz, Andreas Dangel
PMC quorum: reached.
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Regards,
Andreas
---
+1
A new build would greatly improve my life.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Hi all,
First of all, sorry for the lengthy post. I decided to add some context to
explain things a bit, but it resulted in quite a long e-mail. For the past
few weeks I've been trying to come up with a solution for the issue I
filled under SUREFIRE-1935, but I'm getting stuck and starting to feel
michael-o commented on pull request #257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/257#issuecomment-916731454
I prefer `clean verify` to complete tests, not to install or package.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on t
+1
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 7:37 AM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
>
> checked that I could reproduce the build: reference binaries were done
> with
> JDK 8 on some Unix
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le lundi 6 septembre 2021, 20:56:25 CEST Andreas Dangel a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 14 issues:
>
+1
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:49 AM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 22:27 Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 13 issues:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628&version=12344271
> >
> > There are still a couple of iss
28 matches
Mail list logo
