Am 2021-08-24 um 16:24 schrieb Robert Scholte:
FYI: A discussion has started on core-libs-dev mailinglist[1] about
extending java.util.Properties with methods to store properties files
in a reproducible way.
If you have any comments, subscribe to the mailinglist[2] or ask me to
drop the commen
My main remark - after reading the original post - is already captured
in the thread: having method parameters declared Optional feels like
an anti-pattern to me. If must be, there could be an overload, but a
null parameter would be consistent with the existing API.
I think for Maven to be abl
FYI: A discussion has started on core-libs-dev mailinglist[1] about
extending java.util.Properties with methods to store properties files
in a reproducible way.
If you have any comments, subscribe to the mailinglist[2] or ask me to
drop the comments.
thanks,
Robert
[1]
https://mail.openjdk.
