Apply exclusions later?

We have a large dependency which has 300+ transitive dependencies, let's name the dependency as BigDep1. We have large numbers of libraries that depend on BigDep1. We may add exclusions when we use these libraries in our project. com.company... Lib1 some_group_id some_artifact_id

Discuss: maven-war-plugin build war archive directly without building exploded war

We have a large web project and there is large numbers of dependencies. When we run "mvn war:war", it usually takes 40s+ to build a war (~ 600MB) on a windows 10 box and 15s + with a mac book. By checking the war-plugin code, we know the plugin need first copy files necessary to a folder under

[GitHub] [maven-site] michael-o commented on pull request #240: Use an SPDX identifier in example, as recommended

michael-o commented on pull request #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/240#issuecomment-872241943 > > > @michael-o I think it would make sense to re-write the docs when a SPDX field is added, but right now, the docs say to put SPDX into the name, but then don't ac

[GitHub] [maven-site] rjmunro commented on pull request #240: Use an SPDX identifier in example, as recommended

rjmunro commented on pull request #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/240#issuecomment-872241122 @michael-o I think it would make sense to re-write the docs when a SPDX field is added, but right now, the docs say to put SPDX into the name, but then don't actually do it.

Re: Maven 4 performances problems

+1 to fix it before any > alpha release but also agree it is fine to let the alpha-1 go out while it is explicitly mentionned as known and under work. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: Maven 4 performances problems

Am 2021-07-01 um 11:19 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: I've been running a few tests to measure performances. This simplistic test looks like running the following command in a loop and measure the execution time. This is done on a quite big project so that a bunch of pom files are actually read. for

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo merged pull request #244: docs: rewrite More Project Information

elharo merged pull request #244: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/244 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo merged pull request #245: docs: remove forward looking statement

elharo merged pull request #245: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/245 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

Re: Maven 4 performances problems

No, I don't think this requires a delay in the alpha-1 release. Le jeu. 1 juil. 2021 à 12:27, Robert Scholte a écrit : > Should we postpone the alpha-1 release because of this? > For me the most important reason for alpha-1 is to get confirmation that > builds won't be broken due to build/consum

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo opened a new pull request #244: docs: rewrite More Project Information

elharo opened a new pull request #244: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/244 @michael-o focus on element's expected content, and in general be a little less flip and somewhat more direct -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [maven-site] michael-o commented on pull request #240: Use an SPDX identifier in example, as recommended

michael-o commented on pull request #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/240#issuecomment-872147844 I think this is wrong. the `name` shall remain as is. In a future version of the POM we will add something for SPDX. Therefore, I'd recommend to modify the SPDX part. -- T

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo opened a new pull request #245: docs: remove forward looking statement

elharo opened a new pull request #245: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/245 @khmarbaise -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mai

[GitHub] [maven-site-plugin] elharo merged pull request #54: Bump slf4jVersion from 1.7.29 to 1.7.31

elharo merged pull request #54: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/54 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo merged pull request #242: docs: minor cleanup

elharo merged pull request #242: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/242 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo commented on a change in pull request #240: Use an SPDX identifier in example, as recommended

elharo commented on a change in pull request #240: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/240#discussion_r662193689 ## File path: content/apt/pom.apt ## @@ -1474,10 +1474,10 @@ Display parameters as parsed by Maven (in canonical form) and comparison result: +-

Re: Maven 4 performances problems

I agree. We could even mention this known performance "issue" so there wouldn't be any surprise. /Anders On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 12:29 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno gio 1 lug 2021 alle ore 12:27 Robert Scholte < > rfscho...@apache.org> > ha scritto: > > > Should we postpone the alpha-1 r

Re: Maven 4 performances problems

Il giorno gio 1 lug 2021 alle ore 12:27 Robert Scholte ha scritto: > Should we postpone the alpha-1 release because of this? > For me the most important reason for alpha-1 is to get confirmation that > builds won't be broken due to build/consumer. > 100% agreed it is an ALPHA and there are many

Re: Maven 4 performances problems

Should we postpone the alpha-1 release because of this? For me the most important reason for alpha-1 is to get confirmation that builds won't be broken due to build/consumer. But if users simply look at buildtime and due to some slower result don't care for the other changes, then we shouldn't do

Maven 4 performances problems

I've been running a few tests to measure performances. This simplistic test looks like running the following command in a loop and measure the execution time. This is done on a quite big project so that a bunch of pom files are actually read. for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ; do time $MAVEN_HOME/bi

[GitHub] [maven-site-plugin] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #56: Bump doxiaSitetoolsVersion from 1.9.2 to 1.10

dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #56: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/56#issuecomment-871988731 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. You can also ignore all major, minor, or patch releases for

[GitHub] [maven-site-plugin] asfgit closed pull request #56: Bump doxiaSitetoolsVersion from 1.9.2 to 1.10

asfgit closed pull request #56: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/56 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

[GitHub] [maven-site-plugin] asfgit closed pull request #55: Bump doxiaVersion from 1.9.1 to 1.10

asfgit closed pull request #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/55 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

[GitHub] [maven-site-plugin] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #55: Bump doxiaVersion from 1.9.1 to 1.10

dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #55: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/55#issuecomment-871988521 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. You can also ignore all major, minor, or patch releases for