>> I would not want it to be log4j-core-tests-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar as that
would not be understood to be a test jar.
If this artifact is intended for log4j only, consider skipping install/deploy.
But then I wonder why there's a need for a module descriptor.
If it is intended to be used by users of
MNG-5669 contains lambda and IIRC there was a follow up improvement by
Guillaume.
MNG-6824 contains method references.
I think both are more improvements than bugs.
Before MNG-5669 Maven read a dependency that was also part of the reactor
again. Result was the same, just spilling time.
Before
IIUC, DefaultModelBuilder fundamental change was done on June 22 2020:
https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/bdec668de9c600165bb69c95b6ea0625d9f74fb0
before that point in time, there is no issue, isn't it?
then I imagine MNG-5669 and MNG-6824 are safe to cherry pick?
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi
+1
build reproduced, reference build is JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 21 juin 2021, 22:22:58 CEST Michael Osipov a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230&ve
> rsion=12346985
>
> There are still a couple of i
Some of the code is shared on the test side just like you shared code on
the main side, there is nothing unusual abour that. For example test
infrastructure, utilities, JUnit rules, and do on.
Gary
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 02:54 Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:32 PM Gary Gregory
+1
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021, 10:23 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 9 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230&version=12346985
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2
rjmunro opened a new pull request #240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/240
The text says:
> Using an SPDX identifier as the license name is recommended.
But then doesn't use one in the example. I found this confusing.
--
This is an automated message from the
I would avoid cherrypicking any commit related to the DefaultModelBuilder, this
is just not the same class anymore.
Also don't try to add fixes that has been done with Java 8 features.
To make your life easier I would focus on regressions only.
So I would at least NOT try to include:
- MNG-5669
I don't have any objections with backporting those bugfixes, but I'm not
sure whether MNG-6160 will work without MNG-4660. See Maarten's analysis in
the comments [1]. We'll have to re-check that bug when preparing the 3.8.x
release.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6160
Op wo 23 jun.
Folks,
I'd like to proceed with 3.8.x since there are a few issues which users
would like to see addressed.
I went through the issues in 4.0.0-alpha-1 and would like to evaluate
the following to be back ported to 3.8.x branch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5669
https://issues.apac
Am 2021-06-21 um 22:22 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Hi,
We solved 9 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230&version=12346985
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20DOXIA%20AND%20resoluti
11 matches
Mail list logo
