Re: Why no mvn daemon?

Le mer. 31 mars 2021 à 08:17, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > I think mvnd is not so well known [1]: I did never test it, I should > probably > do... > > and as incremental compilation discussion have started recently, we'll > need to > have a global discussion on evaluating and eventually mixing diffe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.1

Retried the test that I did on 3.8.0, this time I observe the desired / correct behaviour. +1 Maarten On March 31, 2021, at 01:46, Mark Derricutt wrote: +1 non-binding - bistro zips are in the /dev/ tree - my multi-repo osgi maven tiles weirdo build works fine. From: Robert Sc

[GitHub] [maven-site] hboutemy commented on pull request #231: Maven 3.3.4

hboutemy commented on pull request #231: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/231#issuecomment-810805280 I suppose this PR was opened by mistake? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

I don't get the reasoning: what content do you expect in such a Maven 3.6.4 release compared to 3.8.1? for what benefit? Le mardi 30 mars 2021, 20:16:23 CEST Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 19:36, Robert Scholte a > > écrit : > > I'm preparing the 3.8.1 release > > So far

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

I think mvnd is not so well known [1]: I did never test it, I should probably do... and as incremental compilation discussion have started recently, we'll need to have a global discussion on evaluating and eventually mixing differents ways of improving build performance when evaluating, I thin

[GitHub] [maven-site] agrimarcal opened a new pull request #231: Maven 3.3.4

agrimarcal opened a new pull request #231: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/231 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this servi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.1

+1 non-binding - bistro zips are in the /dev/ tree - my multi-repo osgi maven tiles weirdo build works fine. From: Robert Scholte Reply: Maven Developers List Date: 31 March 2021 at 9:58:56 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.1 Hi, For th

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

I think there is a point in making better build times. Complexity which comes from native compilation is there and its going to stay. I find mvnd useful for projects which are staying with mainstream JDKs (11 and below) and will eventually migrate to edge ones (12 or 13+) in coming years. It took

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.1

Hi, For the details about this release, please read  https://maven.apache.org/docs/3.8.1/release-notes.html Also please provide feedback on the release notes. (as you know, these are published separately from the release, so it doesn't have to block the release itself) We solved 6 issues: https

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 22:16, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:58 PM Benjamin Marwell > wrote: > > > Other than that, I use mvnd at work and we never had problems on any > > project. We consistently save time without the need of adding the -T > > parameter manually. Another

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:58 PM Benjamin Marwell wrote: > Other than that, I use mvnd at work and we never had problems on any > project. We consistently save time without the need of adding the -T > parameter manually. Another big question is probably: is there enough > community demand to merge

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 19:36, Robert Scholte a écrit : > I'm preparing the 3.8.1 release > So far I see no reason to backport some changes to a possible 3.6.4. > ...provide a fixed version to at least our most recent+used version to enable company policies to be respected with the security fix a

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 19:58, Benjamin Marwell a écrit : > The class cache is also available since Java 8 in the OpenJ9 VM, which also > has faster startup times in most cases (for me). > Not sure if the scc is portable when using different Java language levels, > though. > It is still about app

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

The class cache is also available since Java 8 in the OpenJ9 VM, which also has faster startup times in most cases (for me). Not sure if the scc is portable when using different Java language levels, though. But you can give it a try: https://www.eclipse.org/openj9/docs/shrc/ Other than that, I

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

I'm preparing the 3.8.1 release So far I see no reason to backport some changes to a possible 3.6.4. Only in case we get enough requests from the community to do so, we might consider creating a partial backport. thanks, Robert On 30-3-2021 18:53:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Ok so seems 3.8.1 g

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

Ok so seems 3.8.1 gets a lot of votes. Can we still do a 3.6.4/3.6.3.1 or whatever (3.6 branch is the important point as explained). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

Due to the distribution error, I agree that the next release can only be 3.8.1 today On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:39 PM TheCakeIsNaOH wrote: > Hi, > > I am the maintainer of the Maven Chocolatey package. > > Given that I uploaded a 3.8.0 package after seeing the binaries in the > release > download

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

Hi, I am the maintainer of the Maven Chocolatey package. Given that I uploaded a 3.8.0 package after seeing the binaries in the release download area, there are around ~2,400 users which downloaded that version of the package. Therefore, on the Chocolatey side of things, it would be best if the