maven-gpg-plugin 3.0.1 release

2021-03-29 Thread Frederik Boster
Hi, I think I fixed all of the remaining bugs in Jira in the past few weeks, which were blocking the maven-gpg-plugin 3.0.1 release. Would it be possible to start a new vote or did I miss something? Best Regards, Frederik

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

2021-03-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 19:26, Markus KARG a écrit : > Looking at the impressively reduced bootstrap times of modern JDKs with > features like Automatic AppCDS, I wonder if in the year 2021 this still > makes sense? In rather near future there will be native precompilation > available in most JDKs

AW: Why no mvn daemon?

2021-03-29 Thread Markus KARG
Looking at the impressively reduced bootstrap times of modern JDKs with features like Automatic AppCDS, I wonder if in the year 2021 this still makes sense? In rather near future there will be native precompilation available in most JDKs, effectively reducing bootstrap time to few ms. So is it w

[GitHub] [maven-doxia] plan3d opened a new pull request #59: [DOXIA-609] Fixed crosslinks starting with a dot in markdown files

2021-03-29 Thread GitBox
plan3d opened a new pull request #59: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/59 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, p

Re: Why no mvn daemon?

2021-03-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Up 4 years later ;) Now mvnd exists and proves it is very interesting to have such a feature, should it be something which can fit maven standard delivery? If overall yes we can start by asking mvnd if it can be contributed with main codebase and if not we can either decide to do our own (hope not

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Jesper Udby
I think removing the "suprise" part of a minor upgrade would be a good compromise :-) Brgds Jesper Udby On 29/03/2021 10.34, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 10:24, Jesper Udby a écrit : @Romain: no not really. I'd hate to be in that situation where an "innocent" 3.6.3->3.6

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le lun. 29 mars 2021 à 10:24, Jesper Udby a écrit : > @Romain: no not really. I'd hate to be in that situation where an > "innocent" 3.6.3->3.6.4 upgrade failed and I'd had to go into more > details about why. I've been to one of these orgs where I was doing > architecture, data modelling, soluti

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Jesper Udby
@Romain: no not really. I'd hate to be in that situation where an "innocent" 3.6.3->3.6.4 upgrade failed and I'd had to go into more details about why. I've been to one of these orgs where I was doing architecture, data modelling, solution development and devops (as a one-man army) where unexpe

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Jesper: just to refine, it is just a matter of adding a custom settings.xml for the build/on the CLI (or override it in maven depending what the org wants) to enable back http so you still don't have to set SSL on nexus. Does it change your answer since the first point becomes no more fully accura

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Som Lima
Any way thanks for the cli API On Mon, 29 Mar 2021, 08:18 Som Lima, wrote: > When you put a url in a browser and hit enter. > > IF the url has to travel to a server on the intranet then an algorithm > ensuring tight coupling will be executed. > > IF the url has to travel on the internet to get t

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Som Lima
When you put a url in a browser and hit enter. IF the url has to travel to a server on the intranet then an algorithm ensuring tight coupling will be executed. IF the url has to travel on the internet to get to a server then a completely different algorithm gets executed. The WAN algorithm relie

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Jesper Udby
Hi, I'd like to give my input too. 3.6.4 is IMHO not an option since there is change of behavior that would come as a surprise for some. I know of smaller organisations where running nexus, jenkins etc on HTTP is fine and switching to SSL is not trivial since they do not have proper DevOps or

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release version: 3.6.4, 3.7.0, 3.8.0 or other

2021-03-29 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, I kind of agree intranet is as secure as the internet (ie a lot of attacks done last years were done on intranets). yes you are in a local vpc not accessible from the outside but it is also where hackers try to enter first since then it is open bar for them. That said it is very common to use