Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Hervé BOUTEMY, Slawomir Jaranowski, Olivier Lamy, Sylwester
Lachiewicz, Tamás Cservenák
PMC quorum reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
To unsubscr
I like the regex idea but wildcard (*) does not work well due to common
shell expansion (or it already works but it is outside of maven scope to be
concrete).
My 2cts would be that, to be honest, I think we all lead to have aliases in
maven for potentially very long commands (there was some thread
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven Artifact
Plugin, version 3.0.0
This plugin manage artifacts tasks, currently check Reproducible Builds.
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-artifact-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configura
+1
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021, 10:33 Sylwester Lachiewicz
wrote:
> Kindly reminder, need one more pmc votes
>
> niedz., 14 lut 2021, 01:40 użytkownik Sylwester Lachiewicz <
> slachiew...@apache.org> napisał:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 17 issues:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Relea
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Hervé BOUTEMY, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Robert Scholte, Olivier Lamy
PMC quorum reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
Hard to say: can you do a git bi-sect to discover the commit that changed the
behavior. Then we can see discuss if this change is intended or not.
Robert
On 19-2-2021 18:52:24, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote:
Hello,
* I now gave Apache Maven 4.0.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT
(84a1ff2d5cb7bf49fa3171dd92f7ac088e
Thanks for the quick reaction/answers!
TBH, I haven't fully understood why -N cannot be used here. I do understand
that -N reduces the reactor to one project (before project selection via -pl
can kick in).
But what if -N wouldn't be applied if -pl is present? It would then become a
"secondary"
Le sam. 20 févr. 2021 à 12:43, Martin Kanters a
écrit :
> It would indeed be per module, so it's not a 100% backwards compatible
> workaround.
> Then again, as Robert Scholte suggested in the original discussion [1],
> does it make sense to just build an aggregator pom without its children?
>
Ye
It would indeed be per module, so it's not a 100% backwards compatible
workaround.
Then again, as Robert Scholte suggested in the original discussion [1],
does it make sense to just build an aggregator pom without its children?
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6981?focusedCommentId=17
Le sam. 20 févr. 2021 à 11:14, Martin Kanters a
écrit :
> Hey,
>
> I agree this is unwanted behaviour, we should definitely align
> project inclusion and exclusion.
> In MNG-6981 [1] I made inclusion recursive. Please find the discussion in
> the JIRA comments.
> In summary, you can get the old b
Hey,
I've created the PR to make the exclude project functionality equal to the
include project functionality.
Please find it on GitHub [1].
Martin
[1] https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/448
Op za 20 feb. 2021 om 11:14 schreef Martin Kanters :
> Hey,
>
> I agree this is unwanted behaviour, w
Hey,
I agree this is unwanted behaviour, we should definitely align
project inclusion and exclusion.
In MNG-6981 [1] I made inclusion recursive. Please find the discussion in
the JIRA comments.
In summary, you can get the old behavior back using -f and -N.
I've created MNG-7102 [2] to resolve thi
+1
On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 10:40, Sylwester Lachiewicz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12349647&styleName=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1627/
>
> https://
Kindly reminder, need one more pmc votes
niedz., 14 lut 2021, 01:40 użytkownik Sylwester Lachiewicz <
slachiew...@apache.org> napisał:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 17 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317525&version=12346157&styleName=Text
>
> There are still a
Kindly reminder, still waiting for pmc votes
wt., 16 lut 2021, 22:53 użytkownik Robert Scholte
napisał:
> +1
> On 14-2-2021 01:40:32, Sylwester Lachiewicz
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12349647&styleN
Yes it might be the better solution to keep it backwards compatible and do
recursive -plr X / -plr !X as a new option.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Februar 2021 09:20
An: Maven Developers List
Betreff: Re: Maven 4
Agree it should be alignde, just wonder how you handle '-N' equivalent if
-pl is recursive (so until there is a solution I'm tempting to think not
being recursive can be saner + at least it is backward compatible to v3
which is also important). If we want a recursive -pl we should probably add
a -p
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 :Konrad Windszus, Hervé Boutemy, Robert Scholte, Sylwester Lachiewicz,
Olivier Lamy
PMC quorum reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
To unsubscribe
I second that. It is counterintuitive. It would be beneficial if -pl !X would
also exclude ist submodules.
-Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Falko Modler [mailto:f.mod...@gmx.net]
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Februar 2021 01:39
An: dev@maven.apache.org
Betreff: Maven 4: -pl !... is not r
19 matches
Mail list logo
