[MARCHETYPES-70] New release for maven archetypes

Hi, Recently I've worked on improving the quick start archetype in maven archetypes. Since the build was successful , the branch has been merged

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

wow, nice results: kudos to Julien I'll have a deep look, because (as I already discussed with Julien at some Reproducible Builds events), if we combine his work on this bootstrapping approach with my own Reproducible Builds for Java / Reproducible Central [1] to get reproducible binary artifact

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 17:15:39 CET Michael Osipov a écrit : > Am 2020-11-13 um 18:31 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: > > Hi, > > > > On 12.11.20 20:00, Robert Scholte wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It is already several years ago where we started discussing about > >> Maven Next Generations. > >> Cl

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo merged pull request #215: docs: must --> should

elharo merged pull request #215: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/215 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [maven-site] elharo opened a new pull request #215: docs: must --> should

elharo opened a new pull request #215: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/215 @rfscholte also passive voice to active voice This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

Hi, as an avid user and writer of plugins. I strongly prefer smaller releases. They are easier to adopt. As an example the first 4.0 to only bring a few potentially breaking changes looks very good to me. I understand that the release process involves a significant amount of work. Many thanks for

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

Sorry for being chatty :) but was curious, and looked at sources of "GNU make". And as I see, "GNU make" NEEDS "GNU make" to have it built :) So, I guess this is a usual "thing" in the build tools realm... Hence, same loops Julien had shown in his video stands for GNU make for example, right? (wh

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

Maybe it was not clear from my last statement: so you "hop on bandwagon", and you "joined" the branch of Maven releases, you have 3.6.3. Same version Maven devs use as well. So, you will be able to use it to rebuild 3.6.4, then use 3.6.4 to rebuild 3.6.5, and so on... Hence, no need to redo all th

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

Thanks for the answers! AFAIK, we in Apache as well "vote for source", while we provide binaries as well. Given the video mentions that Maven `-sources` artifacts are NOT buildable (which is true, they are mainly used by IDEs to display library sources while debug for example), am unsure -- at le

Re: Talk: Bootstrapping the Java Ecosystem

On 19/11/2020 09:51, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Without starting any flame wars, am really curious: why are you > repackaging Maven? > > I'd understand for OS/distro native packages, but > why do you rebuild JVM bytecode as well? > > Again, am not to start any flame war, am just curious! Short an