[ALL] Tests on the one other VM: OpenJ9

Hi everyone, In the Apache Shiro project I was able to fix a few issues which only occured on the OpenJ9 VM. The OpenJ9 VM is the only big Java VM implementation next to hotspot. All other VMs (or most other relevant VMs) are hotspot forks. This is the only VM that actually differs from the OpenJ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JLink Plugin version 3.0.0

All maven 3 plugins have a major version of 3.xy. The plugins with a major version of 2.x.y are maven 2 plugins, but they continue to work with maven 3. A plugin cannot have a breaking change*, as the only breaking change would be to require a new major maven version. *) not entirely true, as the

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

Am 2020-11-13 um 19:24 schrieb Robert Scholte: Removing release profile should be combined with fail on missing/unknown profile of MNG-6012 Agreed, Karl just needs to complete his implementation. Remove plugin section in super POM should be fine, now that Hervé has added warnings for it.

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

Removing release profile should be combined with fail on missing/unknown profile of MNG-6012 Remove plugin section in super POM should be fine, now that Hervé has added warnings for it. There should be a default repository: central. I guess you want to move it to conf/settings.xml in the distrib

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JLink Plugin version 3.0.0

Why is this 3.0.0? This is the first release, so 1.0.0 feels right. On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:45 PM Benjamin Marwell wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On 2020/11/11 22:14:35, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 37 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

Hi, On 12.11.20 20:00, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi, It is already several years ago where we started discussing about Maven Next Generations. Clearly we needed to work on the pom, because over time we're facing more and more limitations. For (Maven) Central the Model 4.0.0 will be required pom f

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

From the top of my head: * Remove release profile * Remove plugin section in super POM * Move Central out of Core As well as a review of all consistency fixes to dependency resolution done by Christian Schulte. I also agree with maven-compat. This needs to go, currently not possible due to M

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

I'm not going to say simply yes, it probably depends. Any specific things you have in mind? Also, I don't know what to do with maven-compat. I would prefer to remove it and introduce maven-compat3 as a bucket for classes that we don't want to use in Maven 4, but can still be used by plugins. Reus

Re: [MJLINK] Question about junit4 / junit5

Hi, On 13.11.20 17:42, Benjamin Marwell wrote: Hello, there are currently two PRs for the maven-jlink-plugin. One removes support for junit4. Another one removes support for junit5. On both PRs are discussions with valid points for one or the other. The best one (in my opinion as a contributor

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

Does this mean that we can finally drop deprecated stuff and even break compat? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JLink Plugin version 3.0.0

+1 (non-binding) On 2020/11/11 22:14:35, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 37 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321432&version=12343851 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project

[MJLINK] Question about junit4 / junit5

Hello, there are currently two PRs for the maven-jlink-plugin. One removes support for junit4. Another one removes support for junit5. On both PRs are discussions with valid points for one or the other. The best one (in my opinion as a contributor) would be to "ask the community first" if a singl

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

@Robert: agree and we must move forward, just wanted to put a small warning we shouldn't release just to let it go out but more to ensure it is adopted in good conditions Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

JDK 16 Early Access build 24 is now available

Hi Robert , OpenJDK 16 Early Access build 24**is now available at http://jdk.java.net/16 * These early-access , open-source builds are provided under the o GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception . * Sched

Re: [DISCUSS] Next release should a pre Maven 4.0.0

This is a good topic, but I suggest to start a different thread for it, so we can focus here on the version. Main question is: are there concerns about moving the version of Maven on master to 4.0.0? thanks, Robert On 13-11-2020 08:20:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hmm, this is used by several t