If I have Projects A, B, C with A depends on B, B depends on C, C depends
on A does maven still include one of each A, B, C?
Should the tree output be as below:
Project-groupId:Project-Artifact
\- A
\- B
\- C
\- A (omitted due to cycle)
If this isn't correct what is the expe
I don't think that should be necessary. A failed 3.3.0 release should
not use up the version number. I think there are instructions on the
release page for unrolling a failed release, though I haven't had
cause to use them myself.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:53 AM Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> Hi agai
elharo closed pull request #36:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/36
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
Den fre 17 juli 2020 kl 13:56 skrev Robert Oxspring :
>
> > On 17 Jul 2020, at 10:42, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm checking the scope of releasing maven-resources-plugin. There is
> > currently a transitive dependency chain like this:
> > - maven-resources-plugin depends upon
>
> On 17 Jul 2020, at 10:42, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm checking the scope of releasing maven-resources-plugin. There is
> currently a transitive dependency chain like this:
> - maven-resources-plugin depends upon
> - maven-filtering 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT depends upon
> - maven-shared-util
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 17:05, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Den fre 17 juli 2020 kl 08:55 skrev Olivier Lamy :
>
> > On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 16:53, Dennis Lundberg
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Given that I've been gone for some time from this list things might
> have
> > > changed. If that's t
Hi again,
While I was digging in VCS history I discovered something odd with
maven-shared-utils. The current trunk/head in git has version
3.3.0-SNAPSHOT. But maven-shared-utils 3.3.0 was tagged during a release
in 2017...
https://github.com/apache/maven-shared-utils/tree/029ac4ec7b6636e8c1d32307
Hi,
I'm checking the scope of releasing maven-resources-plugin. There is
currently a transitive dependency chain like this:
- maven-resources-plugin depends upon
- maven-filtering 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT depends upon
- maven-shared-utils 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT
That last SNAPSHOT was added in
https://github.com/ap
Hi Robert , **
*Per the JDK 15 schedule, we are in Rampdown Phase Two* *[1]*
Per the JDK Release Process [2] we now turn our focus to *P1 and P2
bugs*, which can be fixed with approval [3].
Late enhancements are still possible, with approval [4], but the bar is
now extraordinarily high.
**Pl
Thanks Anders,
I found the page you mentioned at
https://maven.apache.org/developers/compatibility-plan.html
I've read that and also the technical details wiki page at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=155749857
The issue in question updates to Maven 3.1.0 dependen
Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 09:31, Hervé BOUTEMY a
écrit :
> Le vendredi 17 juillet 2020, 08:22:10 CEST Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> > Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 00:03, Hervé BOUTEMY a
>
> > > I don't get what "mvn my-test" means: there is no "my-test" phase
> > > and I don't understand how your cust
Hi,
+1 from me
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 13.07.20 23:50, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
We solved 6 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317122&version=12346641&styleName=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1594
Le vendredi 17 juillet 2020, 08:22:10 CEST Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 00:03, Hervé BOUTEMY a
> > I don't get what "mvn my-test" means: there is no "my-test" phase
> > and I don't understand how your custom lifecycle shares some phases with
> > default lifecycle, but ha
There's been some discussion regarding this lately and my take is that
we've settled on that requiring Maven 3.1.0 is ok for plugins. In the same
discussion I *think* we settled on that a Java 8 requirement is ok.
What I don't think we all agreed on is if it's ok to bump the requirements
without a
Den fre 17 juli 2020 kl 08:55 skrev Olivier Lamy :
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 16:53, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given that I've been gone for some time from this list things might have
> > changed. If that's the case I'm sure someone will correct me :)
> >
> > But it used to be the
Hi,
Where do we currently stand when it comes to the minimum version of
Maven required by our plugins? Can a version 3.x Apache Maven plugin
require something newer than Maven 3.0?
The reason I ask is this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-936
which has the consequence that all plugin
16 matches
Mail list logo