Re: custom default lifecycle per project

2020-07-14 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le mar. 14 juil. 2020 à 20:01, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > in this example, you strictly define a new "my-mapping" packaging, like > done in Maven core for every default packagings [1] with documentation in > [2]: don't call it bindings, but simply "packaging-bindings.xml" and it's > more clear >

Re: custom default lifecycle per project

2020-07-14 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
in this example, you strictly define a new "my-mapping" packaging, like done in Maven core for every default packagings [1] with documentation in [2]: don't call it bindings, but simply "packaging-bindings.xml" and it's more clear the more I think about it, the more I feel that what we need is

Re: Short guide "Working with Github pull requests"

2020-07-14 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:25 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > > ***DO NOT CREATE PULL REQUEST FOR RIDICULOUS COMMIT WHICH DO NOT NEED > REVIEW*** IMHO all PRs need review for the same reason everything needs a test. >From experience I know I can't tell the difference between PRs that are too simple to

Flaky integration test on GitHub Actions - Ubuntu JDK11 (testmng5175_ReadTimeOutFromSettings)

2020-07-14 Thread Martin Kanters
Hey all, Since we enabled GitHub Actions on Maven it fully succeeded only once on the Apache GitHub group [1]. After a quick crosscheck I found out that we seem to have a flaky test: MavenITmng5175WagonHttpTest#testmng5175_ReadTimeOutFromSettings. It's flaky since it succeeded once yesterday [2].