[GitHub] [maven-site] rfscholte commented on pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
rfscholte commented on pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168#issuecomment-629865416 I do think the name conflicts. NanoMaven is clearly referring to Apache Maven, but it is unclear that the project is not part of Apache Maven. To prevent any possible confusi

[GitHub] [maven-site] dzikoysk edited a comment on pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
dzikoysk edited a comment on pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168#issuecomment-629833688 > > Project looks active only in last month, website, hosting repo site - not very clear about how to use it, who manages it etc. This is just a minimal proje

[GitHub] [maven-site] dzikoysk commented on pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
dzikoysk commented on pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168#issuecomment-629833688 > > Project looks active only in last month, website, hosting repo site - not very clear about how to use it, who manages it etc. This is just a minimal project with

[GitHub] [maven-site] khmarbaise commented on pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
khmarbaise commented on pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168#issuecomment-629832309 I opened already some issues related the usage/docs but I find that a very interesting project. Apart from that I don't think it violates legals (I'm not a lawyer). The a

[GitHub] [maven-site] slachiewicz commented on pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
slachiewicz commented on pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168#issuecomment-629831753 Project looks active only in last month, website, hosting repo site - not very clear about how to use it, who manages it etc.

[GitHub] [maven-site] dzikoysk commented on pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
dzikoysk commented on pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168#issuecomment-629830357 Oh, good point actually 🤔 `You can choose to release the modified or derived products under different licenses, the unmodified parts of the software, however, must reta

[GitHub] [maven-site] michael-o commented on pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
michael-o commented on pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168#issuecomment-629828239 @rfscholte Does this infringe our Maven name? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To re

[GitHub] [maven-site] dzikoysk opened a new pull request #168: [MNGSITE-412] Add NanoMaven to the list of available repository managers

2020-05-17 Thread GitBox
dzikoysk opened a new pull request #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/168 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above t

Re: Merging via GitHub

2020-05-17 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Olivier Il giorno dom 17 mag 2020 alle ore 04:00 Olivier Lamy ha scritto: > and yeah that's embarrassing > someone mentioned using a script. where is this script? > I have a script that syncs the PR with a local branch. It is very raw so it is not worth to share btw in ZooKeeper community we h

Re: Merging via GitHub

2020-05-17 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
Yes, there's too much noisy mails with rebase and too many unnecessary jira comments from build notifications - any idea where and how to fix it? niedz., 17 maj 2020, 01:53 użytkownik Olivier Lamy napisał: > I wonder what is exactly the problem here? (except a noisy commit but who > cares really

Re: Merging via GitHub

2020-05-17 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
I prefer to keep who was orginal author of commit (here dependabot service). With almost every commit i'm rebasing it (so I'm commiter) or just git ammend to indicate who merged that change. Sylwester niedz., 17 maj 2020, 03:51 użytkownik Olivier Lamy napisał: > On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 11:40, Da