and yeah that's embarrassing
someone mentioned using a script. where is this script?
On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 11:51, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 11:40, David Jencks
> wrote:
>
>> As a side note, I’m personally in favor of the author squashing manually
>> and the “merge” into
On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 11:40, David Jencks wrote:
> As a side note, I’m personally in favor of the author squashing manually
> and the “merge” into master using rebase-and-commit.
>
> To your main issue, I’m pretty sure that GitHub doesn’t keep any secret
> information, instead you are using an i
As a side note, I’m personally in favor of the author squashing manually and
the “merge” into master using rebase-and-commit.
To your main issue, I’m pretty sure that GitHub doesn’t keep any secret
information, instead you are using an insufficiently verbose log command. Try
git log --pretty=
I wonder what is exactly the problem here? (except a noisy commit but who
cares really compared to the useless noise email notifications when someone
rebase a branch)
But at least there are real person name.
That's weird because I just used the "Squash and merge' for this PR (
https://github.co
