+1
binary artifacts reproduced with JDK8 and crlf newlines
Le dimanche 3 mai 2020, 16:18:18 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> My apologies for asking for another vote on this library due to a blocking
> issue related to Maven Wrapper.
>
> We solved 1 blocking issue:
> https://issues.apach
elharo opened a new pull request #162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/162
@slachiewicz
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
slachiewicz commented on pull request #161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/161#issuecomment-624080725
We can skipbook about maven 2
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
elharo opened a new pull request #161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/161
@slachiewicz
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
elharo opened a new pull request #160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/160
@michael-o
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
+1
On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 00:18, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My apologies for asking for another vote on this library due to a blocking
> issue related to Maven Wrapper.
>
> We solved 1 blocking issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12347
I wanted to copy paste that part of AbstractSurefireMojo which solves
this problem in this release but i was too lazy to do it.
I can do it and we can collaborate on the GitHub in a pullrequest -
the resolver's call will be different, that's the only thing, but
doable.
The code is more simple now,
I don't see releasing Surefire 3.0 as fixing this problem. Users having an
upgrade policy in place would still not be able to upgrade to 3.0 anyway.
We are talking about a backward incompatible change in a maintenance
release of the Surefire plugin. As much as I welcome 3.0 to be GA, that
won't cha
+1, sha512 ok, build ok
On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 4:18 PM Robert Scholte wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My apologies for asking for another vote on this library due to a blocking
> issue related to Maven Wrapper.
>
> We solved 1 blocking issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId
+1
On 3-5-2020 16:18:18, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi,
My apologies for asking for another vote on this library due to a blocking
issue related to Maven Wrapper.
We solved 1 blocking issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922&version=12347858&styleName=Text
I would go to the original question. How important is the issue [1]
for the user?
If it is not important, then we can cut the release with one fix SUREFIRE-1679.
If it is important, which does not seem so yet, then we can backport
smart resolver from the master.
Technically possible!
[1]: https:/
11 matches
Mail list logo
