On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:29 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
>
> Sorry I forgot, too much time passed :)
>
>
No worries, Enrico! Thanks again for this initiative, we appreciate it to a
grea degree!
By the way, I checked the summary of maven-ant-plugin on Jira [1] and
happened to notice that it was ma
I've done some refactoring and the code is now ready for testing and merging.[1]
I'd like to finish this soon, so I can focus on the maven-wrapper part.
Any feedback is appreciated.
Robert
[1] https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/286
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6656
Hi,
might someone please explain why catching a NoSuchMethodError at runtime
does not work and we did not see this coming?
In my understanding the old 8.29 checkstyle version should only be a
compile dependency, but not a runtime dependency.
And the patch even was approved by two or three of you.
Il Dom 1 Mar 2020, 16:22 Eric Lilja ha scritto:
> No no, not at all, if you see my first reply in this thread,
Sorry I forgot, too much time passed :)
Enrico
I am
> personally in favor of moving to latest Ant for this plugin, even if it
> requires Java 8!
>
> - Eric L
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020
No no, not at all, if you see my first reply in this thread, I am
personally in favor of moving to latest Ant for this plugin, even if it
requires Java 8!
- Eric L
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 4:19 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il Dom 1 Mar 2020, 16:04 Eric Lilja ha scritto:
>
> > Oh, so ant has alrea
Il Dom 1 Mar 2020, 16:04 Eric Lilja ha scritto:
> Oh, so ant has already been bumped to 1.9.14 (released March 2019), which
> is the highest version of Ant not requiring java 8?
>
For other plugins, like checkstyle, we are following the main dependency,
so if ant moved to java8 I am fine with mo
Oh, so ant has already been bumped to 1.9.14 (released March 2019), which
is the highest version of Ant not requiring java 8?
- Eric L
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 3:35 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> Deps look good except for org.apache.ant which is as high as it can go
> without requiring Java 8.
Deps look good except for org.apache.ant which is as high as it can go
without requiring Java 8.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elh...@ibiblio.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 8:25 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Shivaji
> Sorry for late reply.
> I have some troubles with my local env.
>
> I will start working on it as soon as possible.
>
> We have to check:
> - pending blocker tickets in JIRA
There are two open issues in Jira. Neither looks like
Thanks for doing this, Enrico! It would be absolutely lovely to see the
plugin uplifted to Maven 3 requirement, as the other plugins have, along
with other parent/dependency updates, as you mentioned. Also hoping to see
ant itself bumped to 1.10.7!
Thanks again!
- Eric L
On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at
Shivaji
Sorry for late reply.
I have some troubles with my local env.
I will start working on it as soon as possible.
We have to check:
- pending blocker tickets in JIRA
- pending pull requests
- upgrading dependencies and parent poms
- build ok on builds.apache.org
Then we are good to go.
Pers
asfgit closed pull request #19: [DOXIA-607] Add support for Xhtml5 keygen tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/19
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
michael-o commented on issue #19: [DOXIA-607] Add support for Xhtml5 keygen tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/19#issuecomment-593093527
Branch pushed, awaiting tests...
This is an automated message from the A
michael-o commented on issue #19: [DOXIA-607] Add support for Xhtml5 keygen tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/19#issuecomment-593093142
Surprinsingly, the most recent version does not mention a deprecation:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#keygen
michael-o commented on a change in pull request #19: [DOXIA-607] Add support
for Xhtml5 keygen tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/19#discussion_r386105109
##
File path:
doxia-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/doxia/markup/HtmlMarkup.java
##
@@ -473,6 +4
elharo commented on a change in pull request #19: [DOXIA-607] Add support for
Xhtml5 keygen tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/19#discussion_r386104912
##
File path:
doxia-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/doxia/markup/HtmlMarkup.java
##
@@ -473,6 +473,
minfrin commented on issue #19: [DOXIA-607] Add support for Xhtml5 keygen tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/19#issuecomment-593088806
The tag is a formal part of the html5 spec as follows:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-html5-20141028/single-page.html#the-keygen-element
michael-o commented on issue #19: [DOXIA-607] Add support for Xhtml5 keygen tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia/pull/19#issuecomment-593087315
Mozilla says this is obsolete:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/keygen
Le samedi 29 février 2020, 08:55:14 CET Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit :
[...]
> Of course is open question how to verify maintainer and reputation of used
> maven artifacts.
+1
with Reproducible Builds, another layer of trust is to be able to confirm you
have the sources used to produce the binary:
19 matches
Mail list logo
