Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M4

2019-11-15 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 Thanks to take care of this! On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 22:30, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 43 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12344668 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

2019-11-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Fri 15 Nov 2019 at 15:18, Robert Scholte wrote: > I have to admit that when trying to figure out from a Maven perspective it > felt like post-X should be called with pre-X too, but that opinion has > changed. > Why would anybody call pre-X? I'd say to bring the system ready to do > custom X st

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M4

2019-11-15 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, so checked the release ... ..also running on JDK13 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1712) working now... +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 13.11.19 13:30, Tibor Digana wrote: Hi, We solved 43 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven EAR Plugin version 3.0.2

2019-11-15 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Tbior Digana, Romain Manni-Bucau, Olivier Lamy, Karl Heinz Marbaise PMC quorum: reached. I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven EAR Plugin version 3.0.2

2019-11-15 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, here is my +1 Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 11.11.19 21:03, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 6 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317422&version=12343262 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

2019-11-15 Thread Robert Scholte
I have to admit that when trying to figure out from a Maven perspective it felt like post-X should be called with pre-X too, but that opinion has changed. Why would anybody call pre-X? I'd say to bring the system ready to do custom X stuff, so it should stop here executing any other phases. Howev

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M4

2019-11-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 (non binding) Le ven. 15 nov. 2019 à 12:12, Enrico Olivelli a écrit : > +1 (non binding) > builts and run tests on MacOS + java 8 > > Enrico > > > Il giorno mer 13 nov 2019 alle ore 13:30 Tibor Digana < > tibordig...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 43 issues: > > > > > htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M4

2019-11-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (non binding) builts and run tests on MacOS + java 8 Enrico Il giorno mer 13 nov 2019 alle ore 13:30 Tibor Digana < tibordig...@apache.org> ha scritto: > Hi, > > We solved 43 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927&version=12344668 > > There are

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

2019-11-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Fri 15 Nov 2019 at 09:18, Robert Scholte wrote: > On 13-11-2019 21:46:04, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > On Wed 13 Nov 2019 at 19:29, Robert Scholte wrote: > > > The name of the branch contains MNG-5668, but it contains much more. > > I'd likely lead to comments like "great", without being expli

Re: Second MNG-6759

2019-11-15 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno ven 15 nov 2019 alle ore 10:21 Robert Scholte < rfscho...@apache.org> ha scritto: > I've added MNG-6771 to be fixed for the 3.6.3 release. > I hope you can give it priority. > Sure. I will be able to work actively on the case within the end of next week. I have tried to look at MNG-675

Re: Second MNG-6759

2019-11-15 Thread Robert Scholte
I've added MNG-6771 to be fixed for the 3.6.3 release. I hope you can give it priority. thanks, Robert On 14-11-2019 20:24:40, Enrico Olivelli wrote: Il gio 14 nov 2019, 19:32 Robert Scholte ha scritto: > This looks to be the final issue for Maven 3.6.3. Once accepted I'll > prepare the 3.6.3 re

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

2019-11-15 Thread Robert Scholte
On 13-11-2019 21:46:04, Stephen Connolly wrote: On Wed 13 Nov 2019 at 19:29, Robert Scholte wrote: > The name of the branch contains MNG-5668, but it contains much more. > I'd likely lead to comments like "great", without being explicit saying > which part(s). > I am aware there's all proposals