The index generator is very simple and just indexes named classes, which
makes it very fast with negligible impact on the build.
To spot this kind of ambiguity at generation time would require a deep
analysis of the type hierarchy and caching of those hierarchies to check
for overlaps.
This would
@Hervé: The patch worked fine. Thanks!
@Stuart: In the light that the model interpolator was the only case found,
that is, both equally qualifying classes were located inside the same
javax.injected.Named file, I wonder if it would be easier to check for
ambiguities at generation time, in the sisu
I have a problem with maven-compiler-plugin in multimodule project where
the Jar files appear in classpath and not target/classes. Module B depends
on A but A uses maven-shade-plugin to relocate Shared Utils dependency in A.
Suddenly B fails because cannot find relocated packages of Shared Utils.
MNG-6799 issue created [1]
proposed fix added to the reproducible branch [2] by simply removing the @Named
annotation for the deprecated StringSearchModelInterpolator: CI seems ok
ok for merge?
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6799
[2]
https://github.com/apache/mav
Hervè
can we fix this issue before releasing this version of Wagon ?
this way we can update Wagon in Maven Core
Enrico
Il giorno mer 6 nov 2019 alle ore 11:06 ha scritto:
> issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-574
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> - Mail original -
> De:
issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAGON-574
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Enrico Olivelli"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Cc: "Hervé BOUTEMY"
Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Novembre 2019 09:53:29
Objet: Re: Apache Wagon vs maven-shade vs embedded licenses
Il giorno m
Il giorno mer 6 nov 2019 alle ore 09:03 Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Enrico>(I apologize, I don't want to pollute the vote thread, but this is
> somehow
> related)
>
> I've altered the subject.
>
> Enrico> For binary release (that actually is not part of the offic
Enrico>(I apologize, I don't want to pollute the vote thread, but this is
somehow
related)
I've altered the subject.
Enrico> For binary release (that actually is not part of the official VOTE)
I'm not a lawyer, but:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#what
> WHAT IS A RELEASE?
> R
